exmouth/Exmouth_Network.LPT

 
 
           The DVV / Atkins Ltd / ITS Leeds SATURN Suite 11.3.10E 26/01/2015
                     32-BIT FTN 95 VERSION  -  LEVEL N4
 
           PROGRAM      SATALL   SIMULATION/ASSIGNMENT 13.01.15
           RUNNING EXE: C:\SATWIN\XEXES - 11.3.10E\$SATALL.exe
           DATE OF EXE: 26/ 1/15
 
           MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIMULATION NODES =     23000
                             ASSIGNMENT NODES =     95000
                             ASSIGNMENT LINKS =    200000
                             ZONES            =      4000
 
           DATE 10/ 2/17           TIME 15:41:20
 
               THE MASTER FILE SAT10KEY.DAT READ FROM:
 
               C:\SATWIN\XEXES - 11.3.10E\SAT10KEY.DAT
 
           USER: AECOM (SATURN 10 TRAFFIC MODEL)
 
           BASIC DATA EITHER SET AS DEFAULT OR AS READ FROM SAT10KEY.DAT:
 
  (SET)    HPREF  = C:\SATWIN\HLP\
  (SET)    CPREF  = C:\SATWIN\DAT\
  (SET)    KPREF  = C:\SATWIN\DAT\
  (SET)    LEFTDR =     T
 (DEFAULT) GO4IT  =     F
 (DEFAULT) ADDAL  =     T
 (DEFAULT) LPERP  =    60
 (DEFAULT) LPERT  =    34
  (SET)    DRIVE  = C:
  (SET)    KPEXT  = TXT
 
 
     COMMAND LINE PARAMETERS:  Exemouth_Network ExemouthRandMatrix
 
 
 THE ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABLE FTN95_NEW_MEMORY =    T
 IT IS USED TO MANAGE MEMORY ALLOCATION UNDER OBA AND SHOULD BE T
 IF OBA IS BEING USED.
 
 OPEN THE PREFERENCES/CONTROL FILE:
 
 CONTROL FILE
C:\SATWIN\DAT\SATALL0.DAT
 OPENED OK
 FULL PATH NAME:
C:\SATWIN\DAT\SATALL0.DAT
 
 
 THE INPUT SATURN UFN FILE IS READ FROM CHANNEL  1
 
 
 HEADER DATA FROM THE UNFORMATTED FILE READ FROM CHANNEL  1
 
      RUN NAME   Exemouth Test Network
      CREATED BY PROGRAM SATNET
      DATE AND TIME OF CREATION 10/ 2/17  15:41:20
      FILE NAME: Exemouth_Network.UFN
      PATHNAME:  C:\Projects\ExeterCityFutures\GIS\ExemouthNetwork\Exemouth_Network.UFN
      SATURN VERSION  11.3.10
 
 
 BASIC ASSIGNMENT NETWORK DIMENSIONS:
   39 ZONES     393 NODES     830 LINKS    1 USER CLASSES
 
 
 
 READING NAMELIST DATA FROM CHANNEL  5 - C:\SATWIN\DAT\SATALL0.DAT
 IDENTIFIER: PARAM
 
 
     NAMELIST DATA INPUT ENDS
 
              2 RECORDS READ IN TOTO
              0 WITH SYNTAX ERRORS
              0 VARIABLE NAMES IDENTIFIED
              0 WITH UNIDENTIFIED NAMES OR MISMATCHED DATA
              0 REPEATED INPUT NAMES
 
 
 
     LISTING OF THE IMPORTANT SATALL PARAMETERS USED
 
 ISTOP  =  100   KOB    =    0   KOMBI  =    0
 KONSTP =    5   KORN   =    0   LRTP   =   30
 MASL   =   30   MAXDTP =   10   MAXQCT =   60
 MODET  =    1   NISTOP =    4   NITA   =   10
 NITS   =   10   NFT    =  113   NOPD   =    0
 NOTUK  =    0   NITA_C =  256   NITA_F =    0
 NITA_M =    5   NITA_S =   50   NITS_M =    5
 MET    =    0   NIPS   =    2
 KLUNK  =    0   MASL_M =    0
 
 ALEX   = 5.75   CAPMIN =  30.   GONZO  =   1.000
 SUET   = 0.20   TAX    = 2.00   TDEL   =   3.00
 AFTERS = 0.50   WLMIN  = 300.   WLMAX  =   2000.
 APRESV = 1.00   AK_MIN =0.000   TIJMIN =     0.1000E-09
 RSTOP  =99.50
 
 SAVEIT =    T   SPIDER =    F   UFC109 =    T
 UFC111 =    T
 
 XFSTOP = 0.050   FISTOP = 0.050   UNCRTS = 0.050
 PCNEAR = 1.000   STPGAP =   1.000 STPCPU =  1000.0
 
          VALUES OF LOGICAL VARIABLES
 
 AMY       =    F   ASHORT    =    T   ATLAS     =    T   AUTOK     =    T
 AUTOX     =    T   AUTOZ     =    F   AUTONA    =    T   AUTNUC    =    T
 BB109     =    T   BEAKER    =    T   BUSKER    =    F   BYGRUP    =    F
 BYCAPI    =    F   CASINI    =    F   CLIMAX    =    F   COMPAS    =    F
 CROWCC    =    F   DIADEM    =    F   DIDDLE    =    T   DOUBLE    =    T
 DUALEX    =    T   DUTCH     =    F   ERTM      =    F   EXPERT    =    F
 EZBUS     =    F   FIFO      =    T   FOZZY     =    F   FREDDY    =    F
 FREEKY    =    F   FREEXY    =    T   FREE77    =    F   FUNNEL    =    T
 ICING     =    F   ILOVEU    =    T   KERMIT    =    F   KINKY     =    T
 KONAL     =    F   LCR108    =    T   LEFTDR    =    T   LIST      =    F
 MINDER    =    F   MONACO    =    T   MULTIC    =    F   M108      =    T
 NO333C    =    F   NOXYC     =    F   PARTAN    =    F   PASSQ     =    F
 PHILIP    =    F   PLOD      =    F   PRINT     =    F   PRSFD     =    F
 QUEEN     =    F   QUIKSA    =    F   Q105      =    T   RAGS      =    F
 RB106     =    T   REDMEN    =    F   REFFUB    =    F   ROSIE     =    F
 RTP108    =    T   SATOFF    =    F   SATTIT    =    T   SAVEIT    =    T
 SAVUFO    =    F   SECRET    =    F   SHANDY    =    T   SIGOPT    =    F
 SIM109    =    T   SIM111    =    F   SIM113    =    F   SOWHAT    =    F
 SPARSE    =    T   SPARTA    =    F   SPEEDS    =    T   SPIDER    =    F
 STUART    =    F   STOLL     =    F   SUZIE     =    F   SUZIEQ    =    T
 TDEL11    =    F   TFL       =    F   TOPUP     =    F   UNIQUE    =    F
 UPBUS     =    F   UFC109    =    T   UFC111    =    T   UPDATE    =    F
 UPFCF     =    F   USEUFO    =    F   WHATHO    =    F   WINDY     =    T
 WSTART    =    F   WRIGHT    =    F   XYUSER    =    F   ZILCH     =    F
 
          VALUES OF NON-DEFAULT LOGICAL VARIABLES
 
 ATLAS     =    T   FREEXY    =    T   SPEEDS    =    T   WINDY     =    T
 WRIGHT    =    F
 
          VALUES OF &PARAM INTEGER VARIABLES
 
 IBUSVC     =    1  IFCC       =    2  IFRL       =    1  INKS_S     =    0
 IROCKY     =    6  ISTOP      =  100  IEPSG      =27700  IXSHFT     =    0
 IYSHFT     =    0  IXYDEC     =   -1  KANGA      = 9999  KARL       =   50
 KDF        =    1  KLUNK      =    0  KNOBS      =    0  KOB        =    0
 KOMBI      =    0  KONSTP     =    5  KORN       =    0  KPHMIN     =   10
 KPHMAX     =  100  LCY        =   75  LRTP       =   30  LTP        =   60
 MANOFF     =    0  MASL       =   30  MASL_F     =    0  MASL_M     =    0
 MAXDTP     =   10  MAXLSF     = 3000  MAXQCT     =   60  MAXSPA     =   11
 MAXZN      =  500  MCALG      =    1  MCNUM      =    0  MCCS       =    1
 MCGILL     =    0  MCUBC      =    0  MET        =    0  MINLSF     =  300
 MINRED     =   10  MINSAT     =  500  MODET      =    1  MYTVV      =    5
 NFT        =  113  NIPS       =    2  NISTOP     =    4  NITA       =   10
 NITA_C     =  256  NITA_F     =    0  NITA_M     =    5  NITA_S     =   50
 NITS       =   10  NITS_M     =    5  NOMADS     =    1  NOPD       =    0
 NOPMAX     =    1  NOTUK      =    0  NUC        =   15  NUCMIN     =    1
 
          VALUES OF NON-DEFAULT INTEGER VARIABLES
 
 IROCKY     =    6  ISTOP      =  100  KPHMAX     =  100  LRTP       =   30
 LTP        =   60  MASL       =   30  NITA       =   10  NITA_M     =    5
 NITA_S     =   50  NITS       =   10  NUC        =   15
 
          VALUES OF REAL &PARAM VARIABLES
 
 AFTERS     =    0.5000 AK_MIN     =    0.0000 ALEX       =    5.7500
 APRESV     =    1.0000 BBKING     =    1.0000 BCRP       =    5.0000
 BETA       =    0.1000 BETA_2     =    0.1000 BETA_D     =    0.1000
 BETA_T     =    0.1000 BUSPCU     =    3.0000 BUSSPK     =    0.0000
 BTKNOB     =    0.0000 CAPMIN     =   30.0000 CLICKS     =    0.0000
 COBAF      =    1.0000 DEFCAP     = 1250.0000 DMWL       =  300.0000
 DMWL2      = 2000.0000 FISTOP     =    0.0500 FLAREF     =    2.0000
 FLAREX     =    2.0000 FRED       =    1.0000 GAP        =    2.0000
 GAPM       =    1.5000 GAPR       =    1.5000 GONZO      =    1.0000
 OBAMAX     =    0.1000 PCNEAR     =    1.0000 PMAX       =   10.0000
 POWER      =   -1.0000 PPK        =    6.2000 PPM        =   12.4600
 QDMAX      =  226.0000 QVCMIN     =    0.7500 RESIDD     =    0.0000
 RESIDR     =    0.0000 RSTOP      =   99.5000 STPCPU     = 1000.0000
 STPGAP     =    1.0000 SUET       =    0.2000 TAX        =    2.0000
 TDEL       =    3.0000 TIJMIN     =    0.0000 UNCRTS     =    0.0500
 VCPCU      =    1.0000 WLMIN      =  300.0000 WLMAX      = 2000.0000
 W32D       =    0.0010 W32T       =    0.1000 W32KPH     =    1.5000
 XFSTOP     =    0.0500 XYUNIT     =    1.0000 XYFACT     =    1.0000
 
          VALUES OF NON-DEFAULT REAL VARIABLES
 
 GAP        =    2.0000 GAPM       =    1.5000 GAPR       =    1.5000
 PPK        =    6.2000 PPM        =   12.4600 RSTOP      =   99.5000
 
            EVALUATION OF GLOBAL PARAMETERS ETC.
 
 **** - WARNING - **** A LARGE VALUE OF PMAX, E.G., > 5, IS NOT RECOMMENDED;
        CURRENTLY PMAX =      10.00 - RE-SET PMAX TO 5.0?
        See Section 8.4.2 in the SATURN Manual.
 
 **** - WARNING - **** UPDATE NOT USED; NORMALLY THERE SHOULD BE
        A PREVIOUS NETWORK KICKING AROUND THAT IS WORTH AN UPDATE.
 
 **** - WARNING - **** WSTART NOT USED; HAVE YOU THOUGHT ABOUT
        TRYING IT? See Section 22 of the Manual.
 
 **** - WARNING - **** WE RECOMMEND YOU SET RAGS = T POST 10.9; See 8.6.2
 
 **** - WARNING - **** WE RECOMMEND YOU SET WRIGHT = T POST 10.7
 
 **** - WARNING - **** WE RECOMMEND SETTING A POSITIVE VALUE FOR AK_MIN;
        SAY, 0.20; See Section 9.3.2 in the SATURN Manual
 
INPUT TRIP MATRIX FILE (TIJFIL) = ExemouthRandMatrix.UFM
 
 
           LISTING OF THE OPTIONS CHOSEN UNDER &OPTION IN SATNET:
 
 UPDATE =  F   PASSQ  =  F   PLOD =  F
 WSTART =  F
 
 
 CLOSE CHANNEL  5 FILE C:\SATWIN\DAT\SATALL0.DAT
 
 
          DEFINE AND INPUT THE TRIP MATRIX:
 
 
A TRIP MATRIX HAS BEEN DEFINED BOTH AS:
ExemouthRandMatrix.UFM
ON THE COMMAND LINE AND AS FILTIJ:
ExemouthRandMatrix.UFM
ON THE INPUT .UFN FILE.
 
IDENTICAL FILE NAMES - NO FURTHER ACTION REQUIRED
 
 
OPEN THE TRIP MATRIX FILE ON CHANNEL 9:
ExemouthRandMatrix.UFM
 
 
 HEADER DATA FROM THE UNFORMATTED FILE READ FROM CHANNEL  9
 
      RUN NAME
      CREATED BY PROGRAM MX
      DATE AND TIME OF CREATION 10/ 2/17  15:29:26
      FILE NAME: ExemouthRandMatrix.UFM
      PATHNAME:  C:\Projects\ExeterCityFutures\GIS\ExemouthNetwork\ExemouthRandMatrix.UFM
      SATURN VERSION  11.3.10
 
 
      MATRIX TITLE - ExemouthTestMatrix
      MATRIX SIZE -     39 ROWS     39 COLUMNS
      TYPE OF ELEMENTS - REALS
      ELEMENT DIMENSIONS -
      ELEMENT UNITS -
 
      FILENAME: ExemouthRandMatrix.UFM
 
 
          READ AND PROCESS THE INPUT TRIP MATRIX
          WITH SPARSE = T; I.E., STORE ONLY Tij > 0
 
 
TRIP MATRIX MULTIPLICATION FACTOR FROM THE 888 .DAT FILE =  1.000
 
 
 PLENTY OF ROOM FOR TIJ IN INTERNAL MEMORY:
 WANTED         1410 +VE CELLS =   92.70% OF TOTAL CELLS      1521
 AVAILABLE  67275000
 
 
 PREVIOUSLY ALLOCATED SPACE FOR NETWORK ARRAYS =         3 KBytes
 COMMON BLOCK RAM SPACE USED BY TRIP MATRIX    =        15
 GRAND TOTAL OF RAM SPACE AVAILABLE            =    525589
 COMMON BLOCK RAM SPACE UNUSED                 =    525571
 
 AN ARRAY DIMENSION =  14950000 COULD BE REDUCED BY 100.00% TO        314
 
 IT APPEARS THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE DONE BETTER WITH SPARSE = F
 SINCE STORING ALL TiJ CELLS REQUIRES LESS RAM.
 
 
 SUM OF TRIPS (NON-INTRAS) TO BE ASSIGNED =    14756.00
 SUM OF INTRA-ZONAL TRIPS (NOT ASSIGNED) =         0.00
 
 
 CLOSE CHANNEL  9 FILE ExemouthRandMatrix.UFM
 
 
 CREATE A SCRATCH DIRCK ACCESS FILE ON CHANNEL 8 TO STORE COSTS BY ITERATION:
 $SATURN.$8
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE   2
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP    1               +++++
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 
                 FIRST ITERATION (I.E. INITIAL LOADING)
 
 
      RESULTS FROM THE FIRST ALL-OR-NOTHING LOAD
 
 SUM OF FLOWS*FIXED   TIMES (A) =    10669156.6 PCU-SEC/HR
 SUM OF FLOWS*ALTERED TIMES (B) =    59194763.7 PCU-SEC/HR
              (B-A)/B           =   81.98 %
 
 
      FIXED PRE-COSTS (A) DISAGGREGATED BY PURE TIME / OTHER COSTS:
 
 SUM OF FLOWS*FIXED PURE TIMES  (A1) =     5362442.4 PCU-SEC/HR
 SUM OF FLOWS*FIXED OTHER COSTS (A2) =     5306714.2 PCU-SEC/HR
 
 
 
 
                          ITERATION #    2
 
 LAMBDA (FRACTION OF ALL-OR-NOTHING FLOWS TAKEN) =  26.501 %
 
 
 
 
                          ITERATION #    3
 
 LAMBDA (FRACTION OF ALL-OR-NOTHING FLOWS TAKEN) =  18.892 %
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE   3
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
  12.8467              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
   10.453 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
    2.102              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
 PERCENTAGE INCREASE OF CONGESTED TRAVEL TIMES OVER FREE FLOW
 - EPSILON-2 - =   162.36
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               21.18     4011.573     1603.291    150.21      1743.17                                0.00       723.04     58.52
  2    26.501      7.64     3095.566     1656.299     86.90      1374.13       369.05     26.86         0.00       723.04     47.38     36.18   2
  3    18.892      6.71     2740.848     1852.885     47.92      1231.33       142.80     11.60       343.36       723.04     41.28     21.93   3
  4    15.972      6.75     2479.991     1914.473     29.54      1158.59        72.73      6.28       593.07       723.04     37.59     14.31   4
  5    28.446     16.81     2169.305     1646.931     31.72      1079.03        79.57      7.37       556.65       723.04     32.99     18.27   5
  6     8.606      5.56     2079.045     1729.087     20.24      1055.88        23.15      2.19       705.92       723.04     31.52      6.50   6
  7     9.240      6.58     2042.377     1738.375     17.49      1039.19        16.69      1.61       735.19       735.19     29.25      5.01   7
  8    12.179      9.88     1996.487     1720.618     16.03      1020.67        18.52      1.81       744.80       744.80     27.03      6.09   8
  9     9.423      8.44     1955.379     1732.774     12.85      1007.60        13.08      1.30       784.99       784.99     22.09      4.74   9
 10    10.453     10.45     1896.964                              996.06        11.54      1.16                                                10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     4.5617 B =    -0.6332 R-SQUARED =      86.76 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =    20.6670%
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE   4
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER    1      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
 
 N.B. NO BLOCKING BACK CALCULATIONS ON THE VERY FIRST SIMULATION
 
  1    55.609    56     0     0.00      0     0.00    0      0      0.00  0.000
  2    11.318    46    10  1165.27      0     0.00    0     10   1165.27  0.485
  3     9.370    48     8   265.93      4    62.30    1     13    328.23  0.113
  4     6.956    48     4     1.22      5    42.08    4     13     43.30  0.022
  5     3.372    48     0     0.00      7    18.73    5     12     18.73  0.007
  6     1.494    48     0     0.00      3    12.01    8     11     12.01  0.005
  7     0.411    48     0     0.00      0     0.00   10     10      0.00  0.000
  8     0.200    48     0     0.00      1     0.13    9     10      0.13  0.000
  9     0.070    48     0     0.00      0     0.00   10     10      0.00  0.000
 10     0.015    47     0     0.00      0     0.00   10     10      0.00  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    2 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    1 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    1 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED     1 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION  11 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.09763 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1030 -       0.00
 OUT PROFILES -   1029 -       3.09
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP   1)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1029  1021  1020   2493.75  2513.18    19.43    129.17   452.08    307.89
 2  1012  1028  1059   1689.56  1691.60     2.04     34.53   790.00     66.41
 3  1012  1028  1029   1687.80  1691.60     3.80    232.22   775.00    446.59*
 4  1055  1029  1033   1679.29  1704.09    24.80    118.04   258.33    222.95
 5  1021  1003  1012  -1428.99    40.69  1469.68    132.11   550.00    132.45
 6  1021  1003  1011  -1426.49    43.19  1469.68    460.05   550.00    461.25
 7  1021  1003  1030  -1423.99    45.69  1469.68     32.27   550.00     32.35
 8  1021  1003  1021  -1421.49    48.19  1469.68    112.18   550.00    112.47
 9  1019  1020  1017   1418.03  1420.03     2.00      9.64   650.00     17.02
10  1019  1020  1021   1416.69  1420.03     3.35    173.09   680.00    305.57*
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE   5
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER   1
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =           88.36 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =  201.04 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:    227.53 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =   44
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     11.28 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    11.03    11.03    11.03    11.03    11.03    12.56    25.13
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =      60.030 %
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      0.412 SECONDS -   1 LOOPS  GAP =  60.02991%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        344.5        170.1        514.6   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        344.5        170.1        514.6
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =       1762.1       1726.4       3488.6   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =       1762.1       1726.4       3488.6
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       1262.9        328.8       1591.7   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       1262.9        328.8       1591.7
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =       3369.6       2225.3       5594.8   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       3369.6       2225.3       5594.8
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      38854.8      10262.8      49117.6   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      38854.8      10262.8      49117.6
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =         11.5          4.6          8.8   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =         11.5          4.6          8.8
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE   6
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP    2               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP    2
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =   20.666977
 BEST GAP VALUE     =   60.029911
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =   30.014956
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE   7
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
  10.0825              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    6.561 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
   -0.104              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               29.04     1610.329     1002.211     60.68      1036.50                              428.38       428.38     58.67
  2    29.042     11.88     1273.842      945.308     34.75       945.15        91.35      9.67       616.61       616.61     34.76     15.02   2
  3    11.834      5.49     1215.789      953.440     27.52       923.51        21.64      2.34       661.16       661.16     28.41      6.59   3
  4    10.075      5.20     1212.505      990.515     22.41       910.00        13.51      1.48       688.01       688.01     24.39      5.15   4
  5    12.803      7.58     1181.429     1026.509     15.09       895.63        14.37      1.60       740.71       740.71     17.30      6.47   5
  6    17.705     12.73     1136.509      969.367     17.24       882.63        13.00      1.47       715.49       740.71     16.08      8.39   6
  7     7.268      5.64     1138.394     1013.536     12.32       876.19         6.45      0.74       751.33       751.33     14.25      4.54   7
  8    11.977     10.55     1104.328      988.537     11.71       868.79         7.40      0.85       753.00       753.00     13.33      5.93   8
  9     5.694      5.32     1105.472     1004.222     10.08       865.45         3.33      0.39       764.20       764.20     11.70      2.88   9
 10     6.561      6.56     1094.938                              862.06         3.40      0.39                                                10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     3.9271 B =    -0.6548 R-SQUARED =      97.35 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =    10.9192%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 23527391.10
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 19526455.07
               DIFFERENCE              =  4000936.04
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =     17.0054 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP   2)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
  1014  1016            244.06    708.71    190.38     21.29
  1062  1004            351.65    819.65    133.08     19.34
  1042  1044  1049        3.82    189.28   4857.39     18.87
  1017  1025  1019      148.28    483.21    225.88     18.85
  1056  1055  1047       87.03    368.24    323.11     18.64
  1061  1062  1004      295.85    713.93    141.31     18.61
  1029  1028           1024.57    516.44    -49.59     18.31
  1056  1017  1025      198.04    533.16    169.22     17.53
  1049  1043            325.21    715.09    119.89     17.09
  1056  1018            580.23    239.92    -58.65     16.81
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    4 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  2 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
    6 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE   8
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER    2      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1    14.860    56     3   187.46      7   321.74    0     10    509.20  0.201
  2     3.238    48     4    58.58      6    52.39    1     11    110.96  0.060
  3     2.473    48     3    25.53      4     7.44    3     10     32.97  0.014
  4     1.279    48     5    27.13      1     0.18    5     11     27.31  0.009
  5     0.559    48     2    25.25      2     0.52    7     11     25.77  0.001
  6     0.298    48     2    25.18      0     0.00    9     11     25.18  0.001
  7     0.234    48     2    25.18      0     0.00    9     11     25.18  0.001
  8     0.190    48     2    25.16      0     0.00    9     11     25.16  0.000
  9     0.178    47     2    25.16      0     0.00    9     11     25.16  0.000
 10     0.175    47     2    25.17      0     0.00    9     11     25.17  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    2 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    2 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION  11 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.08203 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1029 -       1.37
 OUT PROFILES -   1055 -       1.91
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP   2)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1019  1020  1017  -1396.88     4.26  1401.14    672.61     9.64      5.12
 2  1012  1028  1059   -926.43   676.67  1603.10     13.58    34.53     18.38
 3  1047  1043  1018    894.40  1009.79   115.40    362.21   519.56    557.62*+
 4  1017  1025  1026    757.36   791.75    34.39    159.94   214.22    226.41*+
 5  1055  1029  1033   -560.59    41.12   601.71    167.26   118.04     69.81
 6  1017  1025  1019    554.05   791.75   237.69    271.58   235.13    384.44
 7  1012  1028  1029    506.84   676.67   169.83    176.29   232.22    238.56*+
 8  1020  1021  1003    433.74   589.94   156.20    164.13   194.10    209.97*
 9  1019  1020  1021   -428.93     5.66   434.59    547.96   173.09    217.68*+
10  1055  1029  1028   -405.03    41.12   446.16    188.53   140.30     91.08
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 19578065.14
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 18635982.29
               DIFFERENCE              =   942082.84
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      4.8119 %
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE   9
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER   2
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  24.22% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    23.37    24.22    26.02    29.40    36.39    48.31    75.30
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                4.49
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =         73.88 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =     26.34 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =      42.36 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =           58.72 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =   41.27 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:     70.28 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =  205
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     52.56 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    52.31    52.56    52.56    53.85    55.90    65.90    78.72
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =      31.152 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
   12846682.996   13655435.460     808752.438     0.06295
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     29525.87  31291.37  -1765.50     -5.64
  SECONDARY STOPS   33868.15  33846.38     21.78      0.06
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    344.54    335.72      8.83      2.63
  QUEUING DELAYS     1762.11   1300.34    461.78     35.51
  CRUISE TIMES       1262.93   1343.81    -80.88     -6.02
  TOTAL TIME         3369.58   2979.86    389.72     13.08
  PCU-DISTANCE      38854.80  41343.66  -2488.86     -6.02
  SPEED                11.53     13.87     -2.34    -16.89
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1012  1003      1.0000      0.5528 *     0.4472       103.1      42.3
  1030  1003      1.0000      0.5824 *     0.4176        80.5      51.8
  1020  1021      0.5453      0.1759 *     0.3694        53.6      53.6
  1019  1025      0.8482      0.5785       0.2697        84.0      84.0
  1011  1003      0.3587 *    0.5793 *     0.2206        32.9      32.9
  1026  1018      0.6533 *    0.7689 *     0.1156        47.7      47.7
  1021  1003      0.8897 *    1.0000       0.1103       111.1     115.5
  1011  1004      0.9002 *    1.0000       0.0998        19.5      19.5
  1043  1018      0.4322      0.4734       0.0412        25.7      25.7
  1028  1029      0.1289 *    0.1690 *     0.0401        23.9      23.9
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =  13
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.4658
     R-SQUARED (Y = X) =     0.3271
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      0.556 SECONDS -   2 LOOPS  GAP =  31.15182%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        335.7        103.4        439.1   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        335.7        103.4        439.1
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =       1300.3        894.9       2195.2   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =       1300.3        894.9       2195.2
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       1343.8        213.6       1557.4   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       1343.8        213.6       1557.4
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =       2979.9       1211.9       4191.7   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2979.9       1211.9       4191.7
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      41343.7       6668.2      48011.8   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      41343.7       6668.2      48011.8
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =         13.9          5.5         11.5   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =         13.9          5.5         11.5
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  10
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP    3               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP    3
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =   10.919204
 BEST GAP VALUE     =   31.151817
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =   15.575909
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  11
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   7.0853              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    6.443 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
    0.972              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               43.72     1265.318      966.689     30.89       896.34                              597.71       597.71     33.32
  2    12.550      6.27     1163.000      976.043     19.15       875.50        20.85      2.38       688.54       688.54     21.35      6.98   2
  3     9.791      5.43     1134.638      980.022     15.78       865.65         9.84      1.14       711.04       711.04     17.86      5.27   3
  4     7.857      4.73     1122.635      995.394     12.78       859.52         6.13      0.71       732.28       732.28     14.80      3.97   4
  5     9.793      6.53     1101.156     1000.157     10.10       853.30         6.22      0.73       752.30       752.30     11.84      4.89   5
  6     6.176      4.39     1095.670     1012.481      8.22       850.16         3.14      0.37       766.97       766.97      9.79      3.11   6
  7     8.650      6.73     1077.723      993.806      8.44       846.61         3.56      0.42       762.69       766.97      9.41      4.27   7
  8    11.224      9.83     1070.560      986.480      8.52       842.04         4.57      0.54       757.96       766.97      8.91      5.74   8
  9     6.343      5.93     1060.250      990.098      7.09       839.34         2.70      0.32       769.19       769.19      8.36      3.60   9
 10     6.443      6.44     1061.541                              837.03         2.31      0.28                                                10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     3.3156 B =    -0.5480 R-SQUARED =      93.46 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     7.8891%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 18635982.29
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 17345050.60
               DIFFERENCE              =  1290931.69
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      6.9271 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP   3)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
  1017  1020  1019       23.28    440.41   1792.01     27.40
  1019  1020  1017        6.39    391.50   6030.14     27.30
  1020  1019            231.59    670.92    189.70     20.68
  1020  1017  1056      139.26    507.78    264.63     20.49
  1020  1019  1002      213.39    596.36    179.47     19.03
  1056  1017  1020      316.99    722.59    127.96     17.79
  1020  1017            352.03    716.10    103.42     15.75
  1017  1025            755.72    389.02    -48.52     15.33
  1017  1020            308.12    631.10    104.82     14.90
  1017  1025  1019      483.21    211.24    -56.28     14.60
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    3 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  2 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
    8 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  12
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER    3      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     6.722    56     2    27.37      9   334.70    0     11    362.07  0.116
  2     2.392    48     7   170.24      2    18.61    0      9    188.85  0.108
  3     1.563    48     4    28.47      3    16.29    1      8     44.75  0.018
  4     0.862    48     3    23.16      2     1.05    3      8     24.21  0.010
  5     0.490    48     2    22.28      1     0.14    5      8     22.42  0.008
  6     0.301    48     2    22.31      0     0.00    6      8     22.31  0.006
  7     0.220    48     1    22.07      0     0.00    7      8     22.07  0.005
  8     0.181    46     1    22.07      0     0.00    7      8     22.07  0.004
  9     0.167    41     1    22.07      0     0.00    7      8     22.07  0.003
 10     0.159    41     1    22.07      0     0.00    7      8     22.07  0.002
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    6 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    6 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION  11 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.12014 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1029 -       1.51
 OUT PROFILES -   1055 -       2.43
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP   3)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1047  1043  1049   -992.40     8.37  1000.77    437.29     3.35      2.27
 2  1055  1029  1033    863.27   973.92   110.65    113.57   167.26    168.45
 3  1055  1029  1028    690.21   973.92   283.71    144.76   188.53    214.71
 4  1012  1028  1059   -654.18     4.36   658.54    922.46    13.58      8.24
 5  1056  1018  1026    577.03   805.72   228.69    159.30   189.01    222.92*+
 6  1020  1019  1025    559.89   570.98    11.09     90.38   268.42    116.66 +
 7  1056  1018  1043    552.54   805.72   253.19    171.22   187.26    239.59
 8  1020  1019  1002    470.51   570.98   100.48    391.22   489.16    504.95*
 9  1017  1025  1019   -326.29    26.41   352.70    237.87   271.58    181.13
10  1025  1026  1001    263.34   368.64   105.30     99.94   144.94    118.30
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 17392130.31
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 17437624.76
               DIFFERENCE              =   -45494.45
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =     -0.2616 %
 
 
 VI FUNCTION AT OLD AND LATEST FLOWS =       6.9271     -0.2616
 RECOMMENDED STEP LENGTH =       0.9636
 (LINEAR FIRST ESTIMATE INCLUDING A CORRECTION FACTOR OF   1.000)
 LOOP   3
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  13
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER    3      #####
           INTERNAL REPEAT  2  NITS_M =  2
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     0.642    56     6    31.65      6   161.03    0     12    192.68  0.020
  2     0.426    48     2    24.62      2     3.52    4      8     28.13  0.002
  3     0.293    48     3    23.32      0     0.00    5      8     23.32  0.000
  4     0.236    48     1    22.95      1     0.14    6      8     23.10  0.000
  5     0.189    47     1    22.95      0     0.00    7      8     22.95  0.000
  6     0.167    45     1    22.95      0     0.00    7      8     22.95  0.000
  7     0.160    46     1    22.95      0     0.00    7      8     22.95  0.000
  8     0.158    41     1    22.95      0     0.00    7      8     22.95  0.000
  9     0.157    39     1    22.95      0     0.00    7      8     22.95  0.000
 10     0.157    33     1    22.95      0     0.00    7      8     22.95  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    6 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    6 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION  11 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.11947 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1029 -       1.57
 OUT PROFILES -   1055 -       2.41
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP   3 REPETITION  2)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1047  1043  1049   -991.95     8.82  1000.77    404.60   437.29      2.38
 2  1055  1029  1033    806.71   917.37   110.65    113.55   113.57    164.85
 3  1012  1028  1059   -637.93    20.61   658.54     78.34   922.46      8.61
 4  1055  1029  1028    633.65   917.37   283.71    144.79   144.76    210.19
 5  1056  1018  1026    540.15   768.84   228.69    159.38   159.30    219.77*+
 6  1056  1018  1043    515.65   768.84   253.19    170.28   171.22    234.79
 7  1020  1019  1025    514.56   525.65    11.09     92.57    90.38    117.14 +
 8  1020  1019  1002    425.18   525.65   100.48    388.74   391.22    491.92*
 9  1017  1025  1019   -320.83    31.87   352.70    228.58   237.87    189.17
10  1028  1029  1021    260.73   349.96    89.23     83.41    82.60     95.13
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 17382113.52
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 17374006.27
               DIFFERENCE              =     8107.26
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0484 %
 
 
 AFTER  1 AUTOK AVERAGE STEPS FACTOR =   1.000
 INCLUDING THE LATEST LOOP RATIO OF   1.000 OF THE FINAL STEP
 LENGTH OF   0.964 TO THE FIRST ESTIMATED STEP LENGTH   0.964;
 See Section 9.3.2 in the SATURN Manual.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  14
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER   3
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  26.14% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    24.22    26.14    29.76    39.88    55.30    73.86    89.40
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                2.13
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =         34.64 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =     12.50 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =      24.12 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =           51.85 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =   29.71 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:     57.29 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =  245
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     62.82 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    62.82    62.82    63.85    64.36    68.72    79.49    89.49
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =      17.638 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
   11661136.320   11592814.229     -68322.094    -0.00586
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     31291.37  32928.89  -1637.52     -4.97
  SECONDARY STOPS   33846.38  31510.49   2335.88      7.41
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    335.72    344.56     -8.84     -2.57
  QUEUING DELAYS     1300.34   1106.91    193.42     17.47
  CRUISE TIMES       1343.81   1352.27     -8.46     -0.63
  TOTAL TIME         2979.86   2803.74    176.13      6.28
  PCU-DISTANCE      41343.66  41662.52   -318.86     -0.77
  SPEED                13.87     14.86     -0.99     -6.63
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1020  1021      1.0000      0.5453       0.4547        53.6       2.2
  1019  1002      0.5546 *    1.0000       0.4454        28.0      28.0
  1043  1018      0.6414      0.4322       0.2092        25.7      25.7
  1019  1025      1.0000      0.8482       0.1518        84.0      31.3
  1021  1003      1.0000      0.8897 *     0.1103       111.1      97.6
  1018  1026      0.7230 *    0.6773 *     0.0457        47.7      47.7
  1011  1003      0.3179 *    0.3587 *     0.0408        32.9      32.9
  1025  1026      0.3208      0.3605       0.0397        35.7      35.7
  1011  1004      0.9362 *    0.9002 *     0.0360        19.5      19.5
  1062  1004      1.0000      0.9726 *     0.0274        78.6      33.3
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =  12
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.5760
     R-SQUARED (Y = X) =     0.5306
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      0.799 SECONDS -   3 LOOPS  GAP =  17.63807%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        344.6         88.3        432.8   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        344.6         88.3        432.8
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =       1106.9        703.2       1810.1   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =       1106.9        703.2       1810.1
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       1352.3        181.8       1534.1   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       1352.3        181.8       1534.1
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =       2803.7        973.3       3777.0   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2803.7        973.3       3777.0
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      41662.5       5715.5      47378.0   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      41662.5       5715.5      47378.0
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =         14.9          5.9         12.5   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =         14.9          5.9         12.5
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  15
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP    4               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP    4
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =    7.889093
 BEST GAP VALUE     =   17.638065
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =    8.819033
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  16
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   5.6174              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    4.858 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
    0.752              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               52.59     1178.073     1001.267     17.66       867.56                              690.76       690.76     20.38
  2     9.102      5.27     1120.289     1003.652     11.62       858.82         8.74      1.02       742.19       742.19     13.58      4.94   2
  3     9.930      6.38     1104.190     1000.956     10.31       853.02         5.81      0.68       749.78       749.78     12.10      4.98   3
  4     4.205      2.82     1093.886     1017.599      7.50       850.85         2.16      0.25       774.57       774.57      8.97      2.09   4
  5    10.070      7.51     1077.247      985.713      9.29       846.98         3.88      0.46       755.44       774.57      8.55      5.08   5
  6     3.850      2.99     1086.364     1025.437      5.94       845.20         1.78      0.21       784.27       784.27      7.21      2.45   6
  7     8.901      7.58     1075.833     1006.654      6.87       842.49         2.71      0.32       773.31       784.27      6.91      4.45   7
  8     2.853      2.50     1072.919     1024.304      4.75       841.51         0.98      0.117      792.89       792.89      5.78      1.69   8
  9     7.895      7.51     1064.907     1008.269      5.62       839.59         1.92      0.23       782.95       792.89      5.56      3.95   9
 10     4.858      4.86     1058.726                              838.23         1.35      0.161                                               10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     3.3287 B =    -0.7398 R-SQUARED =      96.53 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     5.1445%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 17374006.27
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 16729988.66
               DIFFERENCE              =   644017.61
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      3.7068 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP   4)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
  1056  1055  1047      366.03    584.58     59.71     10.02
  1012  1028  1059       10.26     73.74    618.40      9.79
  1017  1056  1055      552.48    783.53     41.82      8.94
  1056  1018            461.63    303.17    -34.33      8.10
  1056  1055            641.16    859.76     34.10      7.98
  1055  1047            685.53    902.55     31.66      7.70
  1047  1043            342.41    499.85     45.98      7.67
  1004  1011  1060      183.57     96.54    -47.41      7.35
  1042 (1044)C   9        1.17     29.35   2418.13      7.22
  1055  1029  1033      172.41     90.68    -47.41      7.13
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    1 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  2 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
    7 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  17
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER    4      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     5.564    56     2    22.74      6   141.19    0      8    163.93  0.141
  2     2.312    47     4    20.86      1     0.45    3      8     21.31  0.035
  3     1.342    48     3     2.44      2     0.96    3      8      3.40  0.005
  4     0.532    48     4     1.95      0     0.00    4      8      1.95  0.001
  5     0.157    48     0     0.00      1     0.18    7      8      0.18  0.000
  6     0.039    48     0     0.00      0     0.00    8      8      0.00  0.000
  7     0.017    48     0     0.00      0     0.00    8      8      0.00  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    6 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    6 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION   8 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.13910 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1038 -       0.02
 OUT PROFILES -   1029 -       4.22
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP   4)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1055  1047  1043    438.74   450.96    12.22     27.18   132.22     33.28
 2  1055  1047  1049    437.57   450.96    13.39     11.76   113.29     14.40
 3  1055  1047  1044    425.45   450.96    25.51    188.06   273.48    230.29
 4  1055  1029  1028   -356.73    63.14   419.87    170.69   144.79    140.31
 5  1055  1047  1048    354.40   450.96    96.56    404.98   465.94    495.92
 6  1056  1018  1043   -345.78    38.42   384.21    183.39   170.28    151.83
 7  1055  1029  1033   -309.69    63.15   372.84    117.58   113.55     87.64
 8  1056  1018  1026   -244.98    38.39   283.37    168.14   159.38    145.59*+
 9  1002  1019  1025    227.06   255.45    28.39    544.08   650.79    609.37
10  1001  1026  1018    218.90   558.52   339.61    384.60   427.44    498.77*+
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 16718472.25
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 16737019.01
               DIFFERENCE              =   -18546.76
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =     -0.1109 %
 
 
 VI FUNCTION AT OLD AND LATEST FLOWS =       3.7068     -0.1109
 RECOMMENDED STEP LENGTH =       0.9709
 (LINEAR FIRST ESTIMATE INCLUDING A CORRECTION FACTOR OF   1.000)
 LOOP   4
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  18
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER    4      #####
           INTERNAL REPEAT  2  NITS_M =  2
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     0.433    56     7     6.98      0     0.00    1      8      6.98  0.002
  2     0.071    48     0     0.00      1     0.46    7      8      0.46  0.000
  3     0.029    48     0     0.00      0     0.00    8      8      0.00  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    6 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    6 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION   4 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.14132 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1022 -       0.04
 OUT PROFILES -   1029 -       4.24
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP   4 REPETITION  2)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1055  1047  1043    420.67   432.89    12.22     26.79    27.18     32.53
 2  1055  1047  1049    419.50   432.89    13.39     11.93    11.76     14.49
 3  1055  1047  1044    407.38   432.89    25.51    188.49   188.06    228.93
 4  1055  1029  1028   -352.25    67.62   419.87    168.42   170.69    142.37
 5  1056  1018  1043   -344.30    39.90   384.21    179.32   183.39    154.39
 6  1055  1047  1048    336.32   432.89    96.56    405.70   404.98    492.74
 7  1055  1029  1033   -305.20    67.64   372.84    115.18   117.58     89.92
 8  1056  1018  1026   -243.52    39.85   283.37    166.16   168.14    147.89*+
 9  1002  1019  1025    220.84   249.23    28.39    545.90   544.08    609.51
10  1001  1026  1018    217.77   557.39   339.61    385.74   384.60    500.00*+
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 16685032.13
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 16681172.55
               DIFFERENCE              =     3859.58
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0238 %
 
 
 AFTER  2 AUTOK AVERAGE STEPS FACTOR =   1.000
 INCLUDING THE LATEST LOOP RATIO OF   1.000 OF THE FINAL STEP
 LENGTH OF   0.971 TO THE FIRST ESTIMATED STEP LENGTH   0.971;
 See Section 9.3.2 in the SATURN Manual.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  19
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER   4
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  28.19% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    25.66    28.19    35.42    48.55    63.25    80.12    97.83
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                1.43
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =         22.84 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =      8.28 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =      14.83 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =           46.60 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =   22.84 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:     49.01 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =  270
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     69.23 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    68.21    69.23    69.23    70.51    75.64    81.54    88.97
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =      11.886 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
   10973448.489   10972162.183      -1286.305    -0.00012
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     32928.89  34369.97  -1441.08     -4.19
  SECONDARY STOPS   31510.49  46282.58 -14772.09    -31.92
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    344.56    364.59    -20.03     -5.49
  QUEUING DELAYS     1106.91   1002.92    103.99     10.37
  CRUISE TIMES       1352.27   1374.91    -22.64     -1.65
  TOTAL TIME         2803.74   2742.41     61.32      2.24
  PCU-DISTANCE      41662.52  42280.44   -617.92     -1.46
  SPEED                14.86     15.42     -0.56     -3.62
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1043  1018      0.8032      0.6414       0.1618        25.7      25.7
  1011  1004      0.8545 *    0.9362 *     0.0817        19.5      19.5
  1026  1018      0.5625 *    0.6324 *     0.0699        47.7      47.6
  1011  1003      0.3393 *    0.3179 *     0.0214        32.9      32.9
  1018  1026      0.7039 *    0.7230 *     0.0191        47.7      47.7
  1025  1026      0.3121      0.3208       0.0087        35.7      35.6
  1019  1002      0.5468 *    0.5546 *     0.0078        28.0      28.0
  1028  1029      0.1356 *    0.1393 *     0.0037        23.9       2.1
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =   8
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.9178
     R-SQUARED (Y = X) =     0.9142
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      0.919 SECONDS -   4 LOOPS  GAP =  11.88611%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        364.6         74.4        439.0   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        364.6         74.4        439.0
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =       1002.9        577.0       1580.0   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =       1002.9        577.0       1580.0
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       1374.9        160.7       1535.6   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       1374.9        160.7       1535.6
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =       2742.4        812.2       3554.6   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2742.4        812.2       3554.6
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      42280.4       5054.9      47335.3   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      42280.4       5054.9      47335.3
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =         15.4          6.2         13.3   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =         15.4          6.2         13.3
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  20
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP    5               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP    5
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =    5.144494
 BEST GAP VALUE     =   11.886109
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =    5.943055
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  21
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   3.8703              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    3.725 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
    0.907              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               61.71     1130.614     1010.425     11.89       848.89                              728.70       728.70     14.16
  2     6.378      4.20     1111.482     1021.079      8.85       844.76         4.12      0.49       754.36       754.36     10.70      3.43   2
  3     3.887      2.67     1106.281     1051.862      5.17       842.97         1.80      0.21       788.55       788.55      6.46      1.99   3
  4     7.031      5.19     1090.646     1032.165      5.67       841.06         1.91      0.23       782.57       788.55      6.24      3.51   4
  5     3.121      2.38     1093.214     1047.712      4.34       840.14         0.91      0.109      794.64       794.64      5.42      1.74   5
  6     6.505      5.30     1080.577     1031.076      4.80       838.65         1.49      0.177      789.15       794.64      5.25      3.27   6
  7     5.504      4.74     1084.118     1037.207      4.52       837.30         1.35      0.162      790.39       794.64      5.10      3.08   7
  8     5.134      4.66     1083.535     1039.876      4.20       836.09         1.21      0.145      792.43       794.64      4.96      2.85   8
  9     5.641      5.43     1073.798     1033.788      3.87       834.84         1.24      0.149      794.83       794.83      4.79      3.00   9
 10     3.725      3.72     1074.656                              834.10         0.74      0.088                                               10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     2.0224 B =    -0.2045 R-SQUARED =      99.09 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     4.6904%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 16681172.55
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 16380970.37
               DIFFERENCE              =   300202.18
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      1.7996 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP   5)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
  1056  1018            307.77    463.98     50.75      7.95
  1017  1056  1018      263.60    404.65     53.51      7.72
  1050 (1048)C  18       51.99    119.11    129.08      7.26
  1056  1018  1043      176.95    280.91     58.75      6.87
  1055  1047            896.24    712.25    -20.53      6.49
  1042  1044  1049      188.54    116.34    -38.29      5.85
 C  24 (1060) 1009       45.27     93.56    106.66      5.80
  1051  1050  1048       93.35    156.99     68.18      5.69
  1054  1051            275.20    369.81     34.38      5.27
  1018 (1026)C  10      119.66    183.39     53.26      5.18
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    1 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  2 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
    7 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  22
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER    5      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     4.109    56     2    19.06      7   102.20    0      9    121.26  0.142
  2     1.668    48     2     6.16      4    35.18    2      8     41.35  0.030
  3     0.973    48     2    23.53      3     0.90    2      7     24.43  0.009
  4     0.717    48     1     1.99      0     0.00    6      7      1.99  0.001
  5     0.339    48     1     0.34      0     0.00    6      7      0.34  0.000
  6     0.164    47     0     0.00      1     0.18    6      7      0.18  0.000
  7     0.066    46     0     0.00      1     0.18    6      7      0.18  0.000
  8     0.013    44     0     0.00      0     0.00    7      7      0.00  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    7 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    7 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION   9 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.12397 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1036 -       0.01
 OUT PROFILES -   1029 -       3.85
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP   5)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1055  1029  1033    387.80   485.98    98.18     95.60   115.18    115.88
 2  1056  1018  1026    358.24   636.60   278.36    155.01   166.16    202.36*+
 3  1056  1018  1043    291.03   636.60   345.57    188.38   179.32    245.92
 4  1055  1047  1049   -256.88   160.38   417.26      8.47    11.93      8.99
 5  1055  1047  1043   -244.27   160.38   404.65     19.02    26.79     20.18
 6  1055  1029  1028    194.08   485.98   291.90    162.73   168.42    197.24
 7  1001  1026  1018   -166.10   260.26   426.36    412.50   385.74    467.01*+
 8  1001  1026  1025   -162.76   277.99   440.75     74.35    71.31     84.18
 9  1026  1018  1056    151.07   416.54   265.46     77.85    78.17     92.25
10  1017  1025  1019   -148.60     5.33   153.93    730.45   240.71    293.24
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 16440929.19
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 16399561.43
               DIFFERENCE              =    41367.76
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.2516 %
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  23
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER   5
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  31.20% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    26.02    31.20    37.95    52.65    70.24    84.58    98.43
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                1.01
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =         15.92 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =      5.80 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =      10.16 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =           46.26 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =   13.86 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:     29.97 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =  282
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     72.31 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    72.31    72.31    72.56    74.62    78.97    87.44    96.41
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =       7.486 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
   10714509.388   10733205.135      18695.746     0.00174
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     34369.97  34113.17    256.80      0.75
  SECONDARY STOPS   46282.58  47278.04   -995.46     -2.11
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    364.59    368.42     -3.83     -1.04
  QUEUING DELAYS     1002.92    901.51    101.40     11.25
  CRUISE TIMES       1374.91   1381.43     -6.52     -0.47
  TOTAL TIME         2742.41   2651.36     91.05      3.43
  PCU-DISTANCE      42280.44  42507.29   -226.84     -0.53
  SPEED                15.42     16.03     -0.62     -3.84
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1025  1026      1.0000      0.3121       0.6879        35.7      29.8
  1030  1009      0.7543 *    1.0000       0.2457        20.5      20.5
  1043  1018      1.0000      0.8032       0.1968        25.7       6.0
  1011  1004      0.9172 *    0.8545 *     0.0627        19.5      19.5
  1018  1026      0.7648 *    0.7039 *     0.0608        47.7      47.7
  1026  1018      0.6090 *    0.5625 *     0.0464        47.7      47.6
  1019  1002      0.5562 *    0.5468 *     0.0094        28.0      28.0
  1011  1003      0.3361 *    0.3393 *     0.0032        32.9      32.9
  1028  1029      0.1382 *    0.1356 *     0.0025        23.9       5.1
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =   9
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.3903
     R-SQUARED (Y = X) =     0.1751
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      1.008 SECONDS -   5 LOOPS  GAP =   7.48567%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        368.4         67.9        436.4   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        368.4         67.9        436.4
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =        901.5        420.4       1321.9   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        901.5        420.4       1321.9
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       1381.4        147.7       1529.2   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       1381.4        147.7       1529.2
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =       2651.4        636.1       3287.5   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2651.4        636.1       3287.5
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      42507.3       4640.0      47147.3   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      42507.3       4640.0      47147.3
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =         16.0          7.3         14.3   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =         16.0          7.3         14.3
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  24
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP    6               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP    6
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =    4.690378
 BEST GAP VALUE     =    7.485669
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =    7.485669
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  25
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   3.1228              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    3.825 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
   -0.313              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               65.57     1107.727     1031.334      7.41       840.96                              764.57       764.57      9.08
  2     7.447      5.28     1076.304     1022.740      5.24       838.31         2.64      0.32       784.75       784.75      6.39      3.46   2
  3     3.026      2.21     1079.642     1036.945      4.12       837.46         0.85      0.102      794.76       794.76      5.10      1.59   3
  4     5.162      3.98     1067.708     1024.230      4.24       836.36         1.10      0.132      792.88       794.76      4.97      2.59   4
  5     3.468      2.77     1073.409     1036.479      3.56       835.60         0.76      0.091      798.67       798.67      4.42      1.82   5
  6     6.557      5.60     1055.490     1015.867      3.90       834.43         1.16      0.139      794.81       798.67      4.29      3.15   6
  7     3.711      3.29     1062.310     1032.858      2.85       833.67         0.77      0.092      804.22       804.22      3.53      2.14   7
  8     4.037      3.73     1054.212     1020.150      3.34       833.07         0.60      0.072      799.01       804.22      3.46      2.03   8
  9     3.895      3.75     1057.518     1025.494      3.12       832.41         0.66      0.080      800.38       804.22      3.39      2.30   9
 10     3.825      3.83     1052.303                              831.80         0.61      0.073                                               10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     2.3225 B =    -0.5140 R-SQUARED =      88.43 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     3.2082%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 16399561.43
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 16215455.69
               DIFFERENCE              =   184105.74
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      1.1226 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP   6)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
  1019  1025  1017      163.20    299.33     83.42      8.95
  1025  1017            449.54    588.29     30.86      6.09
 C  11 (1020) 1017       54.95    105.08     91.22      5.60
 C  16 (1020) 1019       68.35    114.95     68.17      4.87
  1019  1020  1017      514.21    417.66    -18.78      4.47
  1020  1017            847.34    722.25    -14.76      4.47
  1056  1018            463.98    374.74    -19.23      4.36
  1055  1029  1033      119.50     78.36    -34.43      4.14
 C  16 (1025) 1019      161.19    112.85    -29.99      4.13
  1042  1044  1049      116.34     76.29    -34.43      4.08
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    1 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  2 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
    6 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  26
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER    6      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     3.155    56     2     7.29      6    92.97    0      8    100.26  0.096
  2     1.055    48     4    40.15      3     8.58    2      9     48.74  0.083
  3     0.819    48     2     0.58      2     8.14    5      9      8.72  0.004
  4     0.519    48     2     0.32      1     9.87    6      9     10.19  0.006
  5     0.333    48     0     0.00      3     9.03    6      9      9.03  0.005
  6     0.168    47     0     0.00      1     6.49    8      9      6.49  0.007
  7     0.096    44     0     0.00      1     5.42    8      9      5.42  0.001
  8     0.068    40     0     0.00      1     5.31    8      9      5.31  0.001
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    7 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    7 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION   9 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.12812 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1044 -       0.06
 OUT PROFILES -   1029 -       3.17
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP   6)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1001  1026  1018    814.89  1178.54   363.64    306.20   412.50    502.73*+
 2  1001  1026  1025    811.71  1195.53   383.82     56.04    74.35     92.01
 3  1025  1026  1018    400.57   522.70   122.14    199.88   284.52    254.75*+
 4  1056  1018  1026   -295.24   118.03   413.27    162.19   155.01    167.06*+
 5  1056  1018  1043   -290.11   118.03   408.14    191.76   188.38    197.52
 6  1055  1029  1028   -256.50   102.42   358.92    181.82   162.73    180.25
 7  1026  1018  1056    247.90   603.31   355.40     49.47    77.85     63.42*
 8  1026  1018  1043    221.06   600.71   379.65    273.85   416.93    351.12
 9  1025  1026  1001    176.95   522.70   345.75     49.82    58.33     63.49
10  1018  1056  1055    154.38   263.42   109.03     53.13    62.90     59.48
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 16621329.49
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 16577168.96
               DIFFERENCE              =    44160.53
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.2657 %
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  27
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER   6
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  34.22% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    29.76    34.22    44.82    64.10    78.31    88.67    98.80
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                0.76
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =         11.77 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =      4.31 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =       7.79 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =           48.65 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =   16.83 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:     34.60 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =  286
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     73.33 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    73.33    73.33    74.62    75.90    80.51    86.67    93.59
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =      10.898 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
   10897577.979   10936277.449      38699.469     0.00355
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     34113.17  33432.79    680.38      2.04
  SECONDARY STOPS   47278.04  46606.75    671.29      1.44
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    368.42    357.33     11.10      3.11
  QUEUING DELAYS      901.51    916.15    -14.63     -1.60
  CRUISE TIMES       1381.43   1384.42     -2.99     -0.22
  TOTAL TIME         2651.36   2657.89     -6.53     -0.25
  PCU-DISTANCE      42507.29  42507.72     -0.43      0.00
  SPEED                16.03     15.99      0.04      0.25
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1025  1026      0.3852      1.0000       0.6148        35.7      35.7
  1026  1018      0.4200      0.6090 *     0.1890        47.7      47.6
  1011  1003      0.4764 *    0.3361 *     0.1403        32.9      32.9
  1019  1002      0.6096 *    0.5562 *     0.0534        28.0      28.0
  1018  1026      0.8135 *    0.7648 *     0.0487        47.7      47.7
  1018  1056      0.9612 *    1.0000       0.0388        47.8      42.6
  1011  1004      0.8899 *    0.9172 *     0.0273        19.5      19.5
  1030  1009      0.7595 *    0.7543 *     0.0052        20.5      20.5
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =   9
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.4846
     R-SQUARED (Y = X) =     0.2555
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      1.098 SECONDS -   6 LOOPS  GAP =  10.89767%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        357.3         64.4        421.7   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        357.3         64.4        421.7
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =        916.1        502.3       1418.4   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        916.1        502.3       1418.4
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       1384.4        144.4       1528.9   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       1384.4        144.4       1528.9
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =       2657.9        711.1       3369.0   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2657.9        711.1       3369.0
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      42507.7       4594.3      47102.0   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      42507.7       4594.3      47102.0
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =         16.0          6.5         14.0   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =         16.0          6.5         14.0
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  28
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP    7               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP    7
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =    3.208249
 BEST GAP VALUE     =    7.485669
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =    3.742835
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  29
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   2.6885              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    4.582 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
   -0.611              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               63.13     1126.019     1012.625     11.20       856.38                              742.98       742.98     13.24
  2     5.604      3.75     1110.934     1026.715      8.20       853.21         3.17      0.37       768.99       768.99      9.87      2.79   2
  3     6.651      4.76     1111.515     1037.232      7.16       850.31         2.89      0.34       776.03       776.03      8.74      3.44   3
  4     7.880      6.13     1095.510     1028.271      6.54       847.55         2.77      0.33       780.31       780.31      7.93      3.72   4
  5     3.981      3.22     1104.095     1063.127      3.85       846.10         1.45      0.172      805.13       805.13      4.84      2.16   5
  6     4.731      4.02     1093.974     1049.148      4.27       845.13         0.96      0.114      800.31       805.13      4.73      2.35   6
  7     2.546      2.22     1102.497     1069.416      3.09       844.55         0.58      0.069      811.47       811.47      3.92      1.46   7
  8     6.080      5.65     1087.432     1043.644      4.20       843.57         0.98      0.116      799.78       811.47      3.81      2.95   8
  9     2.657      2.54     1094.120     1065.474      2.69       842.97         0.61      0.072      814.32       814.32      3.40      1.89   9
 10     4.582      4.58     1086.724                              842.32         0.64      0.076                                               10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     2.6177 B =    -0.6267 R-SQUARED =      92.92 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     3.1810%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 16577168.96
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 16229237.80
               DIFFERENCE              =   347931.16
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      2.0989 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP   7)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
  1026  1018            692.86    477.85    -31.03      8.89
  1026  1018  1043      619.59    428.86    -30.78      8.33
  1060  1011            436.05    617.89     41.70      7.92
  1009  1060  1011      353.50    505.40     42.97      7.33
  1001  1026            593.71    430.79    -27.44      7.20
  1056  1018            374.74    521.73     39.22      6.94
  1056  1017  1056        1.84     27.91   1419.05      6.76
  1001  1026  1018      538.34    395.83    -26.47      6.59
  1060  1011  1004      116.33    198.98     71.05      6.58
  1017  1056  1018      335.84    463.35     37.97      6.38
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    1 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  2 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
    8 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  30
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER    7      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     4.258    56     4    68.28      6   120.74    0     10    189.02  0.321
  2     1.323    48     1     2.83      4    21.28    2      7     24.11  0.027
  3     0.935    48     1     0.30      1     0.20    3      5      0.50  0.001
  4     0.555    47     0     0.00      0     0.00    5      5      0.00  0.000
  5     0.350    47     0     0.00      0     0.00    5      5      0.00  0.000
  6     0.126    46     0     0.00      0     0.00    5      5      0.00  0.000
  7     0.028    46     0     0.00      0     0.00    5      5      0.00  0.000
  8     0.013    36     0     0.00      0     0.00    5      5      0.00  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    6 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    6 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION   9 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.05748 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1038 -       0.03
 OUT PROFILES -   1029 -       1.75
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP   7)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1001  1026  1025   -649.62    37.02   686.64    120.00    56.04     58.36
 2  1001  1026  1018   -529.21    15.65   544.85    611.25   306.20    371.41 +
 3  1025  1026  1001   -416.90    24.24   441.14    269.55    49.82     45.27
 4  1026  1018  1043   -415.51    18.44   433.96    572.07   273.85    386.75
 5  1026  1018  1056   -346.16    32.12   378.28    152.70    49.47     67.16 +
 6  1060  1011  1004    268.74   302.88    34.14    151.53   212.30    173.50*+
 7  1060  1011  1003    265.01   302.88    37.86    320.48   375.36    366.95*+
 8  1025  1026  1018   -240.23    24.24   264.48    480.52   199.88    251.90 +
 9  1056  1018  1026    214.99   635.06   420.07    161.48   162.19    210.66*+
10  1002  1019  1020    208.43   434.36   225.92    434.25   479.69    528.04
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 15851554.14
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 16059478.32
               DIFFERENCE              =  -207924.18
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =     -1.3117 %
 
 
 VI FUNCTION AT OLD AND LATEST FLOWS =       2.0989     -1.3117
 RECOMMENDED STEP LENGTH =       0.6154
 (LINEAR FIRST ESTIMATE INCLUDING A CORRECTION FACTOR OF   1.000)
 LOOP   7
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  31
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER    7      #####
           INTERNAL REPEAT  2  NITS_M =  2
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     4.077    56     3    34.23      7    77.74    0     10    111.96  0.121
  2     0.444    48     1     0.29      2     2.63    3      6      2.92  0.002
  3     0.271    48     1     2.36      0     0.00    5      6      2.36  0.063
  4     0.174    47     0     0.00      0     0.00    6      6      0.00  0.000
  5     0.092    47     0     0.00      0     0.00    6      6      0.00  0.000
  6     0.036    46     0     0.00      0     0.00    6      6      0.00  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    7 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    7 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION   7 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.08241 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1047 -       0.01
 OUT PROFILES -   1029 -       2.42
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP   7 REPETITION  2)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1001  1026  1025   -647.35    39.29   686.64    120.00   120.00     71.34
 2  1001  1026  1018   -526.68    18.17   544.85    595.95   611.25    422.10 +
 3  1025  1026  1001   -415.35    25.79   441.14    251.02   269.55     56.51
 4  1026  1018  1043   -399.74    34.22   433.96    518.15   572.07    456.53
 5  1026  1018  1056   -331.59    46.69   378.28    129.18   152.70     80.79 +
 6  1025  1026  1018   -238.68    25.79   264.48    469.06   480.52    270.79 +
 7  1018  1056  1055    176.08   275.76    99.68     55.69    58.53     62.73
 8  1018  1056  1017    176.08   279.10   103.02    513.75   523.45    578.68
 9  1002  1019  1020    135.64   361.56   225.92    450.20   434.25    529.76
10  1032  1031  1022    127.37   132.76     5.38    356.79   355.25    376.79*
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 15694214.27
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 15773767.25
               DIFFERENCE              =   -79552.99
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =     -0.8237 %
 
 
 VI FUNCTION AT OLD AND LATEST FLOWS =       2.0989     -0.8237
 RECOMMENDED STEP LENGTH =       0.4204 AT REPEAT  2
 LOOP   7
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  32
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER    7      #####
           INTERNAL REPEAT  3  NITS_M =  1
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     2.739    56     3    64.79      6    56.51    1     10    121.30  0.101
  2     0.521    48     3     3.31      2    10.79    3      8     14.10  0.065
  3     1.112    47     3     2.97      0     0.00    4      7      2.97  0.013
  4     1.427    47     1    79.19      2    11.36    5      8     90.55  0.068
  5     1.400    47     2     7.22      1    11.09    6      9     18.31  0.007
  6     0.876    44     1     0.20      1    11.16    6      8     11.36  0.007
  7     0.537    42     0     0.00      2    10.65    6      8     10.65  0.065
  8     0.735    40     1     2.57      0     0.00    6      7      2.57  0.013
  9     1.116    41     1    78.64      2    11.48    5      8     90.11  0.068
 10     1.178    40     2     7.27      1    11.09    6      9     18.36  0.007
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    7 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    7 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION  11 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.78378 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1044 -       2.30
 OUT PROFILES -   1045 -      12.08
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP   7 REPETITION  3)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1025  1026  1018    201.18   465.66   264.48    225.19   469.06    279.74*+
 2  1026  1018  1056    179.92   558.20   378.28     53.00   129.18     66.72*+
 3  1018  1056  1017    126.86   229.87   103.02    514.69   513.75    565.68
 4  1018  1056  1055    126.86   226.54    99.68     54.95    55.69     60.39
 5  1056  1018  1043   -126.50   363.84   490.33    198.37   200.94    228.90
 6  1028  1029  1021    125.64   224.40    98.77     47.44    45.36     50.73
 7  1026  1018  1043    121.90   555.86   433.96    297.24   518.15    374.20
 8  1011  1003  1011   -115.74   174.74   290.48     28.73    29.50     30.78
 9  1011  1003  1012   -115.74   172.24   287.98    114.33   114.59    122.51
10  1011  1003  1021   -115.74   169.74   285.48    343.53   346.24    368.11
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 16360761.14
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 16293813.26
               DIFFERENCE              =    66947.88
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.9733 %
 
 
 AFTER  3 AUTOK AVERAGE STEPS FACTOR =   0.894
 INCLUDING THE LATEST LOOP RATIO OF   0.683 OF THE FINAL STEP
 LENGTH OF   0.420 TO THE FIRST ESTIMATED STEP LENGTH   0.615;
 See Section 9.3.2 in the SATURN Manual.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  33
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER   7
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  32.77% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    26.99    32.77    38.92    55.42    72.65    85.54    99.04
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                1.03
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =         17.40 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =      6.39 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =      12.29 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =           46.80 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =   10.89 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:     23.26 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =  265
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     67.95 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    67.69    67.95    68.21    70.51    77.18    83.33    93.33
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =       4.949 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
   10605495.614   10681170.161      75674.547     0.00714
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     33432.79  35199.15  -1766.36     -5.02
  SECONDARY STOPS   46606.75  48502.26  -1895.50     -3.91
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    357.33    370.14    -12.82     -3.46
  QUEUING DELAYS      916.15    871.11     45.04      5.17
  CRUISE TIMES       1384.42   1394.50    -10.08     -0.72
  TOTAL TIME         2657.89   2635.75     22.14      0.84
  PCU-DISTANCE      42507.72  42859.35   -351.63     -0.82
  SPEED                15.99     16.26     -0.27     -1.65
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1028  1029      1.0000      0.1384 *     0.8616        23.9      12.1
  1025  1026      1.0000      0.3852       0.6148        35.7      34.9
  1031  1022      0.4271 *    1.0000       0.5729        46.3      46.5
  1011  1003      0.4214 *    0.4764 *     0.0551        32.9      32.9
  1026  1018      0.4734      0.4200       0.0534        47.7      47.5
  1018  1026      0.8396 *    0.8135 *     0.0261        47.7      47.7
  1030  1009      0.7357 *    0.7595 *     0.0238        20.5      20.5
  1011  1004      0.9115 *    0.8899 *     0.0215        19.5      19.5
  1018  1056      0.9509 *    0.9612 *     0.0102        47.8      36.6
  1019  1002      0.6022 *    0.6096 *     0.0074        28.0      28.0
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =  10
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.0120
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      1.303 SECONDS -   7 LOOPS  GAP =   4.94914%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        370.1         62.6        432.8   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        370.1         62.6        432.8
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =        871.1        354.6       1225.7   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        871.1        354.6       1225.7
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       1394.5        137.2       1531.7   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       1394.5        137.2       1531.7
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =       2635.8        554.4       3190.1   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2635.8        554.4       3190.1
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      42859.3       4315.0      47174.4   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      42859.3       4315.0      47174.4
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =         16.3          7.8         14.8   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =         16.3          7.8         14.8
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  34
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP    8               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP    8
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =    3.181003
 BEST GAP VALUE     =    4.949137
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =    4.949137
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  35
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   2.1183              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    4.253 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
   -0.670              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               69.53     1104.668     1052.576      4.95       845.28                              793.18       793.18      6.16
  2     4.722      3.45     1090.749     1047.217      4.16       844.08         1.20      0.142      800.55       800.55      5.16      2.30   2
  3     4.182      3.18     1096.474     1057.926      3.64       843.12         0.96      0.114      804.57       804.57      4.57      2.20   3
  4     4.784      3.83     1085.132     1051.720      3.18       842.22         0.90      0.107      808.81       808.81      3.97      2.33   4
  5     2.702      2.22     1093.245     1062.334      2.91       841.76         0.47      0.055      810.85       810.85      3.67      1.40   5
  6     4.762      4.11     1082.554     1047.338      3.36       841.03         0.73      0.086      805.82       810.85      3.59      2.35   6
  7     3.016      2.68     1088.040     1058.524      2.79       840.49         0.54      0.064      810.98       810.98      3.51      1.79   7
  8     5.025      4.71     1072.748     1040.738      3.08       839.77         0.72      0.086      807.76       810.98      3.43      2.44   8
  9     2.128      2.04     1079.985     1057.582      2.12       839.42         0.35      0.042      817.02       817.02      2.67      1.21   9
 10     4.253      4.25     1075.664                              838.95         0.48      0.057                                               10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     2.0616 B =    -0.4426 R-SQUARED =      62.47 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     2.5472%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 16293813.26
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 16162380.98
               DIFFERENCE              =   131432.28
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.8066 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP   8)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
  1059  1028  1012        3.34     55.28   1555.50      9.59
  1028 (1029)C  14       25.79     76.71    197.48      7.11
  1020  1017  1020        4.60     25.15    446.95      5.33
  1019  1025  1017      347.22    443.59     27.75      4.85
  1026  1018  1043      539.41    441.74    -18.11      4.41
  1026  1018            602.47    499.56    -17.08      4.38
  1017  1020  1019      275.49    211.80    -23.12      4.08
 C  14 (1059) 1028       95.19    138.21     45.19      3.98
 C  14 (1029) 1028      143.28     99.62    -30.47      3.96
  1019  1025  1026      369.88    297.55    -19.56      3.96
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    0 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  1 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
    8 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  36
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER    8      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     2.901    56     3    13.58      5    72.90    0      8     86.47  0.124
  2     0.947    47     2     1.10      1    18.98    3      6     20.08  0.007
  3     0.671    47     0     0.00      1     0.33    4      5      0.33  0.000
  4     0.416    47     0     0.00      0     0.00    5      5      0.00  0.000
  5     0.291    46     0     0.00      0     0.00    5      5      0.00  0.000
  6     0.095    46     0     0.00      0     0.00    5      5      0.00  0.000
  7     0.019    44     0     0.00      0     0.00    5      5      0.00  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    6 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    6 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION   8 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.03131 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1038 -       0.04
 OUT PROFILES -   1029 -       0.78
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP   8)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1001  1026  1025   -446.45    39.00   485.45    120.00    59.38     70.55
 2  1026  1018  1043   -423.13    28.19   451.32    500.47   297.24    406.31
 3  1026  1018  1056   -408.94    42.08   451.02    139.72    53.00     74.36 +
 4  1001  1026  1018   -403.31    17.79   421.10    592.43   341.25    410.98 +
 5  1025  1026  1001   -394.12    23.88   418.00    281.60    50.05     49.38
 6  1025  1026  1018   -120.84    23.88   144.72    476.33   225.19    239.62 +
 7  1060  1011  1004    115.37   222.85   107.48    130.08   129.49    143.16*+
 8  1032  1031  1022    101.99   181.10    79.11    348.21   367.16    377.02*+
 9  1018  1056  1017    101.56   207.16   105.60    508.26   514.69    552.07
10  1018  1056  1055    101.56   203.83   102.27     55.46    54.95     60.25
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 15664872.93
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 15674185.43
               DIFFERENCE              =    -9312.50
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =     -0.0594 %
 
 
 VI FUNCTION AT OLD AND LATEST FLOWS =       0.8066     -0.0594
 RECOMMENDED STEP LENGTH =       0.8330
 (LINEAR FIRST ESTIMATE INCLUDING A CORRECTION FACTOR OF   0.894)
 LOOP   8
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  37
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER    8      #####
           INTERNAL REPEAT  2  NITS_M =  2
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     1.968    56     3    16.91      4    31.96    1      8     48.86  0.021
  2     0.100    47     0     0.00      0     0.00    5      5      0.00  0.000
  3     0.037    47     0     0.00      0     0.00    5      5      0.00  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    6 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    6 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION   4 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.04994 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1044 -       0.05
 OUT PROFILES -   1029 -       1.13
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP   8 REPETITION  2)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1001  1026  1025   -446.17    39.28   485.45    120.00   120.00     71.79
 2  1026  1018  1043   -421.25    30.07   451.32    498.71   500.47    420.71
 3  1026  1018  1056   -407.46    43.56   451.02    138.21   139.72     76.60 +
 4  1001  1026  1018   -402.98    18.12   421.10    591.94   592.43    417.21 +
 5  1025  1026  1001   -393.71    24.28   418.00    274.95   281.60     51.55
 6  1018  1056  1017    131.03   236.63   105.60    506.31   508.26    558.19
 7  1018  1056  1055    131.03   233.30   102.27     55.04    55.46     60.68
 8  1025  1026  1018   -120.44    24.29   144.72    474.12   476.33    246.40 +
 9  1055  1047  1044    109.48   337.95   228.47    143.01   142.71    165.73
10  1055  1047  1049     99.69   337.95   238.26      5.30     4.96      6.14
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 15639665.96
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 15642307.35
               DIFFERENCE              =    -2641.39
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =     -0.0203 %
 
 
 VI FUNCTION AT OLD AND LATEST FLOWS =       0.8066     -0.0203
 RECOMMENDED STEP LENGTH =       0.7729 AT REPEAT  2
 LOOP   8
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  38
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER    8      #####
           INTERNAL REPEAT  3  NITS_M =  1
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     1.469    56     3    18.89      4    27.52    1      8     46.41  0.009
  2     0.041    47     0     0.00      0     0.00    5      5      0.00  0.000
  3     0.014    47     0     0.00      0     0.00    5      5      0.00  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    6 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    6 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION   4 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.04441 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1044 -       0.02
 OUT PROFILES -   1029 -       1.26
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP   8 REPETITION  3)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1001  1026  1025   -446.06    39.39   485.45    120.00   120.00     72.22
 2  1026  1018  1043   -419.84    31.48   451.32    497.84   498.71    425.82
 3  1026  1018  1056   -406.17    44.85   451.02    134.24   138.21     77.40 +
 4  1001  1026  1018   -402.87    18.23   421.10    591.76   591.94    419.35 +
 5  1025  1026  1001   -393.57    24.43   418.00    272.55   274.95     52.32
 6  1018  1056  1017    141.80   247.40   105.60    505.60   506.31    560.41
 7  1018  1056  1055    141.80   244.06   102.27     54.89    55.04     60.84
 8  1025  1026  1018   -120.29    24.44   144.72    473.33   474.12    248.84 +
 9  1055  1047  1044    113.16   341.63   228.47    143.14   143.01    166.16
10  1055  1047  1049    103.37   341.63   238.26      5.42     5.30      6.29
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 15638748.17
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 15639594.27
               DIFFERENCE              =     -846.10
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =     -0.0070 %
 
 
 VI FUNCTION AT OLD AND LATEST FLOWS =       0.8066     -0.0070
 RECOMMENDED STEP LENGTH =       0.6934 AT REPEAT  3
 LOOP   8
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  39
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER    8      #####
           INTERNAL REPEAT  4  NITS_M =  1
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     1.546    56     3    23.52      4    23.89    1      8     47.41  0.013
  2     0.050    47     0     0.00      0     0.00    5      5      0.00  0.000
  3     0.018    47     0     0.00      0     0.00    5      5      0.00  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    7 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    7 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION   4 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.05120 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1044 -       0.02
 OUT PROFILES -   1029 -       1.43
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP   8 REPETITION  4)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1001  1026  1025   -445.92    39.53   485.45    120.00   120.00     72.81
 2  1026  1018  1043   -417.70    33.62   451.32    496.55   497.84    432.64
 3  1026  1018  1056   -404.16    46.86   451.02    128.77   134.24     78.46 +
 4  1001  1026  1018   -402.71    18.40   421.10    591.53   591.76    422.29 +
 5  1025  1026  1001   -393.36    24.63   418.00    269.40   272.55     53.35
 6  1018  1056  1055    156.08   258.34   102.27     54.69    54.89     61.04
 7  1018  1056  1017    156.08   261.67   105.60    504.64   505.60    563.33
 8  1025  1026  1018   -120.08    24.64   144.72    472.28   473.33    252.05 +
 9  1055  1047  1044    118.30   346.76   228.47    143.28   143.14    166.72
10  1055  1047  1049    108.51   346.76   238.26      5.58     5.42      6.50
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 15636482.23
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 15635245.87
               DIFFERENCE              =     1236.37
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0114 %
 
 
 AFTER  4 AUTOK AVERAGE STEPS FACTOR =   0.857
 INCLUDING THE LATEST LOOP RATIO OF   0.744 OF THE FINAL STEP
 LENGTH OF   0.693 TO THE FIRST ESTIMATED STEP LENGTH   0.931;
 See Section 9.3.2 in the SATURN Manual.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  40
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER   8
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  37.23% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    30.84    37.23    46.75    67.47    80.12    90.84    99.28
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                0.66
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =         10.14 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =      3.73 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =       6.75 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =           40.70 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =   13.37 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:     32.85 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =  293
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     75.13 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    74.87    75.13    77.95    80.77    83.08    85.64    95.38
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =      11.262 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
    9943215.399    9948164.591       4949.191     0.00050
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     35199.15  36426.33  -1227.18     -3.37
  SECONDARY STOPS   48502.26  47132.07   1370.19      2.91
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    370.14    355.45     14.70      4.13
  QUEUING DELAYS      871.11    762.39    108.72     14.26
  CRUISE TIMES       1394.50   1411.27    -16.77     -1.19
  TOTAL TIME         2635.75   2529.11    106.64      4.22
  PCU-DISTANCE      42859.35  43440.23   -580.88     -1.34
  SPEED                16.26     17.18     -0.92     -5.33
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1026  1018      1.0000      0.4734       0.5266        47.7       1.9
  1019  1002      1.0000      0.6022 *     0.3978        28.0      20.2
  1018  1056      1.0000      0.9509 *     0.0491        47.8      41.1
  1011  1004      0.9278 *    0.9115 *     0.0163        19.5      19.5
  1031  1022      0.4131 *    0.4271 *     0.0140        46.3      46.3
  1018  1026      0.8467 *    0.8396 *     0.0071        47.7      47.7
  1011  1003      0.4169 *    0.4214 *     0.0044        32.9      32.9
  1030  1009      0.7344 *    0.7357 *     0.0013        20.5      20.5
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =   8
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.3513
     R-SQUARED (Y = X) =     0.0007
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      1.450 SECONDS -   8 LOOPS  GAP =  11.26217%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        355.4         53.2        408.6   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        355.4         53.2        408.6
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =        762.4        269.8       1032.2   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        762.4        269.8       1032.2
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       1411.3        121.8       1533.0   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       1411.3        121.8       1533.0
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =       2529.1        444.7       2973.8   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2529.1        444.7       2973.8
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      43440.2       3764.9      47205.2   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      43440.2       3764.9      47205.2
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =         17.2          8.5         15.9   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =         17.2          8.5         15.9
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  41
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP    9               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP    9
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =    2.547184
 BEST GAP VALUE     =    4.949137
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =    4.949137
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  42
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   3.1921              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    4.545 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
    0.217              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               60.60     1059.658      952.342     11.27       831.21                              723.89       723.89     12.91
  2     9.847      6.62     1021.852      940.372      8.66       825.69         5.52      0.67       744.21       744.21      9.87      5.14   2
  3     3.723      2.60     1032.853      969.194      6.57       824.07         1.62      0.197      760.41       760.41      7.72      1.99   3
  4     5.646      4.18     1021.620      976.814      4.59       822.28         1.78      0.22       777.48       777.48      5.45      2.80   4
  5     4.550      3.53     1023.855      988.533      3.57       821.27         1.02      0.124      785.94       785.94      4.30      2.27   5
  6     4.003      3.23     1025.278      988.839      3.69       820.56         0.71      0.086      784.12       785.94      4.22      2.00   6
  7     5.801      4.97     1018.055      982.454      3.62       819.50         1.06      0.129      783.90       785.94      4.09      3.06   7
  8     4.356      3.90     1021.101      992.600      2.87       818.72         0.78      0.095      790.22       790.22      3.48      2.31   8
  9     6.093      5.82     1018.886      987.368      3.19       817.86         0.87      0.106      786.34       790.22      3.38      3.04   9
 10     4.545      4.55     1018.705                              817.14         0.72      0.088                                               10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     2.2193 B =    -0.4493 R-SQUARED =      84.74 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     3.2226%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 15635245.87
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 15319558.59
               DIFFERENCE              =   315687.27
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      2.0191 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP   9)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
  1001  1026            498.97    816.36     63.61     12.38
  1026  1018            531.12    855.09     61.00     12.31
  1001  1026  1018      450.11    718.13     59.54     11.09
  1026  1018  1043      471.69    728.18     54.38     10.47
  1002  1001  1026       66.54    176.63    165.42      9.98
  1030  1002  1001       68.27    177.67    160.26      9.87
  1031  1001  1026      432.37    639.70     47.95      8.96
  1049  1044  1042       32.35     89.58    176.92      7.33
  1018  1043            703.24    902.33     28.31      7.03
  1017  1056           1248.91   1015.90    -18.66      6.92
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    0 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  1 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
    5 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  43
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER    9      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     4.960    56     2    69.29      4    33.06    0      6    102.35  0.072
  2     1.526    47     3     4.77      0     0.00    3      6      4.77  0.007
  3     1.061    47     1     2.09      1     0.42    4      6      2.51  0.005
  4     0.712    47     1     8.09      0     0.00    5      6      8.09  0.004
  5     0.390    47     1     0.39      0     0.00    5      6      0.39  0.001
  6     0.162    46     0     0.00      1     0.24    5      6      0.24  0.000
  7     0.037    47     0     0.00      0     0.00    6      6      0.00  0.000
  8     0.016    43     0     0.00      0     0.00    6      6      0.00  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    6 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    6 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION   9 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.02301 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1038 -       0.02
 OUT PROFILES -   1029 -       0.59
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP   9)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1001  1026  1018    752.05   956.25   204.20    423.85   591.53    634.78*
 2  1001  1026  1025    740.94   974.38   233.44     83.50   120.00    125.05
 3  1025  1026  1018    321.29   352.26    30.97    276.84   472.28    324.89*
 4  1025  1026  1001    317.87   352.26    34.40    101.19   269.40    118.75
 5  1056  1018  1043   -221.65    59.32   280.97    215.25   201.39    209.73
 6  1026  1018  1056    204.26   417.26   213.01     87.49   128.77    103.75
 7  1055  1047  1049   -191.60   147.07   338.67      3.88     5.58      4.09
 8  1055  1047  1043   -169.79   147.07   316.86     17.37    24.97     18.27
 9  1032  1031  1022    135.64   301.05   165.41    328.61   350.96    377.53*+
10  1031  1001  1002    129.70   159.06    29.36    430.62   651.33    462.87
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 15730503.87
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 16071577.60
               DIFFERENCE              =  -341073.73
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =     -2.1682 %
 
 
 VI FUNCTION AT OLD AND LATEST FLOWS =       2.0191     -2.1682
 RECOMMENDED STEP LENGTH =       0.4132
 (LINEAR FIRST ESTIMATE INCLUDING A CORRECTION FACTOR OF   0.857)
 LOOP   9
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  44
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER    9      #####
           INTERNAL REPEAT  2  NITS_M =  2
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     3.262    56     3    15.36      2    11.14    1      6     26.51  0.011
  2     0.876    47     2     6.12      1     0.15    4      7      6.27  0.050
  3     0.710    47     0     0.00      1     1.21    6      7      1.21  0.001
  4     0.420    47     0     0.00      1     0.30    6      7      0.30  0.000
  5     0.211    47     0     0.00      0     0.00    7      7      0.00  0.000
  6     0.071    46     0     0.00      0     0.00    7      7      0.00  0.000
  7     0.014    47     0     0.00      0     0.00    7      7      0.00  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    7 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    7 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION   8 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.03724 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1038 -       0.03
 OUT PROFILES -   1029 -       1.04
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP   9 REPETITION  2)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1026  1018  1056    175.53   388.54   213.01     88.38    87.49    103.47
 2  1056  1018  1026    152.02   331.69   179.66    156.37   150.60    177.64*+
 3  1055  1047  1048    149.71   292.79   143.08    380.92   381.12    431.58
 4  1001  1026  1025   -111.20   122.24   233.44     93.52    83.50     97.31
 5  1001  1026  1018   -100.55   103.65   204.20    504.37   423.85    524.79*
 6  1002  1019  1025     86.48   242.46   155.98    525.20   496.57    583.94
 7  1055  1029  1033     82.25   219.42   137.17     62.63    56.53     66.64
 8  1002  1019  1020     80.80   247.86   167.07    431.38   424.79    479.62
 9  1032  1031  1022     79.03   244.44   165.41    337.50   328.61    377.21*+
10  1055  1029  1028    -71.87   219.42   291.29    195.70   201.80    208.23
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 15669183.86
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 15617272.50
               DIFFERENCE              =    51911.36
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.8018 %
 
 
 AFTER  5 AUTOK AVERAGE STEPS FACTOR =   0.871
 INCLUDING THE LATEST LOOP RATIO OF   0.928 OF THE FINAL STEP
 LENGTH OF   0.413 TO THE FIRST ESTIMATED STEP LENGTH   0.482;
 See Section 9.3.2 in the SATURN Manual.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  45
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER   9
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  33.13% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    28.80    33.13    41.33    58.67    74.34    85.78    96.75
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                1.08
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =         18.18 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =      6.69 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =      14.45 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =           40.99 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =    8.28 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:     20.21 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =  268
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     68.72 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    68.72    68.72    68.97    69.74    76.41    86.67    96.15
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =       4.531 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
    9946158.322    9977153.391      30995.068     0.00312
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     36426.33  36641.34   -215.01     -0.59
  SECONDARY STOPS   47132.07  47406.00   -273.94     -0.58
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    355.45    371.50    -16.05     -4.32
  QUEUING DELAYS      762.39    756.34      6.05      0.80
  CRUISE TIMES       1411.27   1409.80      1.47      0.10
  TOTAL TIME         2529.11   2537.63     -8.52     -0.34
  PCU-DISTANCE      43440.23  43383.11     57.12      0.13
  SPEED                17.18     17.10      0.08      0.47
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1019  1002      0.6623 *    1.0000       0.3377        28.0      28.0
  1026  1018      0.8151 *    1.0000       0.1849        47.7      47.6
  1011  1004      0.9483 *    0.9278 *     0.0205        19.5      19.5
  1030  1009      0.7464 *    0.7344 *     0.0121        20.5      20.5
  1031  1022      0.4027 *    0.4131 *     0.0104        46.3      46.3
  1011  1003      0.4261 *    0.4169 *     0.0091        32.9      32.9
  1018  1026      0.8395 *    0.8467 *     0.0072        47.7      47.7
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =   7
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.7091
     R-SQUARED (Y = X) =     0.4288
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      1.583 SECONDS -   9 LOOPS  GAP =   4.53127%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        371.5         52.0        423.5   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        371.5         52.0        423.5
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =        756.3        248.6       1005.0   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        756.3        248.6       1005.0
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       1409.8        116.7       1526.5   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       1409.8        116.7       1526.5
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =       2537.6        417.3       2954.9   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2537.6        417.3       2954.9
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      43383.1       3648.6      47031.7   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      43383.1       3648.6      47031.7
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =         17.1          8.7         15.9   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =         17.1          8.7         15.9
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  46
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP   10               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP   10
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =    3.222600
 BEST GAP VALUE     =    4.531265
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =    4.531265
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  47
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   2.3366              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    4.060 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
    0.698              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               68.91     1057.075     1012.759      4.38       828.00                              783.69       783.69      5.35
  2     3.341      2.38     1046.546     1011.029      3.51       827.26         0.74      0.089      791.74       791.74      4.29      1.67   2
  3     5.356      4.03     1058.013     1022.278      3.50       826.30         0.96      0.116      790.57       791.74      4.18      2.70   3
  4     3.453      2.69     1043.004     1015.776      2.68       825.69         0.61      0.074      798.47       798.47      3.30      1.76   4
  5     3.956      3.21     1044.802     1018.368      2.60       825.15         0.54      0.066      798.72       798.72      3.20      1.99   5
  6     4.783      4.08     1038.907     1012.227      2.64       824.52         0.63      0.077      797.84       798.72      3.13      2.40   6
  7     3.824      3.39     1036.149     1014.417      2.14       824.01         0.51      0.062      802.28       802.28      2.64      1.97   7
  8     3.721      3.43     1040.788     1018.015      2.24       823.60         0.41      0.050      800.82       802.28      2.59      1.89   8
  9     3.968      3.81     1033.574     1009.974      2.34       823.15         0.45      0.055      799.55       802.28      2.54      2.11   9
 10     4.060      4.06     1036.360                              822.67         0.48      0.058                                               10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     1.9026 B =    -0.4527 R-SQUARED =      88.36 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     2.4175%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 15617272.50
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 15512769.04
               DIFFERENCE              =   104503.46
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.6692 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP  10)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
  1025  1026  1001       88.31    141.28     59.98      4.94
  1017  1020  1019      193.67    133.46    -31.09      4.71
  1017  1020            454.44    366.46    -19.36      4.34
  1059  1028  1012       57.34     93.03     62.24      4.12
 C  23 (1025) 1026      106.68    151.04     41.59      3.91
  1019  1020  1017      362.43    296.68    -18.14      3.62
  1028 (1029)C  14       75.47    107.40     42.30      3.34
 C  14 (1029) 1028       94.61     65.20    -31.09      3.29
  1031  1001  1026      518.04    594.20     14.70      3.23
  1056  1017  1020      547.98    474.95    -13.33      3.23
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    0 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  1 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
    7 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  48
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER   10      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     2.151    56     2     9.28      5    30.86    0      7     40.15  0.065
  2     0.729    47     2     1.01      3    28.49    2      7     29.51  0.019
  3     0.406    47     0     0.00      2     2.52    4      6      2.52  0.002
  4     0.205    47     1     2.92      1     0.31    5      7      3.23  0.048
  5     0.090    47     0     0.00      0     0.00    7      7      0.00  0.000
  6     0.044    47     1     0.10      0     0.00    6      7      0.10  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    6 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    6 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION   7 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.03126 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1035 -       0.02
 OUT PROFILES -   1029 -       0.51
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP  10)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1055  1047  1048    139.70   326.09   186.39    355.22   380.92    408.17
 2  1032  1031  1022    135.73   380.17   244.44    317.03   337.50    378.10*+
 3  1001  1026  1025   -127.99   125.96   253.95    103.15    93.52    106.02
 4  1001  1026  1018   -127.18   106.90   234.08    561.92   504.37    577.54*+
 5  1055  1029  1033     83.50   230.31   146.80     52.72    62.63     56.41
 6  1002  1019  1025    -81.96   113.44   195.40    528.81   525.20    550.05
 7  1028  1029  1021     76.54   205.60   129.06     28.74    37.08     30.38
 8  1026  1018  1043    -73.00   348.53   421.53    486.07   442.35    562.01
 9  1019  1002  1019     71.93   112.52    40.60      0.00     0.00      0.00
10  1019  1002  1001     71.93   109.19    37.26    261.68   266.88    273.78
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 15430938.90
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 15347645.36
               DIFFERENCE              =    83293.55
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.5398 %
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  49
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER  10
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  39.88% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    32.17    39.88    53.25    73.49    83.98    91.20    99.52
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                0.54
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =          8.33 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =      3.07 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =       5.70 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =           40.52 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =    6.77 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:     16.70 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =  280
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     71.79 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    71.54    71.79    72.05    75.90    81.54    90.26    98.46
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =       3.328 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
    9700916.397    9759824.722      58908.324     0.00607
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     36641.34  36720.57    -79.23     -0.22
  SECONDARY STOPS   47406.00  45284.88   2121.12      4.68
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    371.50    380.44     -8.95     -2.35
  QUEUING DELAYS      756.34    701.62     54.72      7.80
  CRUISE TIMES       1409.80   1414.94     -5.14     -0.36
  TOTAL TIME         2537.63   2497.00     40.63      1.63
  PCU-DISTANCE      43383.11  43540.72   -157.61     -0.36
  SPEED                17.10     17.44     -0.34     -1.96
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1026  1018      0.9557 *    0.8151 *     0.1405        47.7      47.7
  1018  1026      0.9088 *    0.8395 *     0.0692        47.7      47.7
  1031  1022      0.3855 *    0.4027 *     0.0172        46.3      46.3
  1030  1009      0.7584 *    0.7464 *     0.0119        20.5      20.5
  1011  1003      0.4375 *    0.4261 *     0.0115        32.9      32.9
  1011  1004      0.9571 *    0.9483 *     0.0088        19.5      19.5
  1019  1002      0.6640 *    0.6623 *     0.0016        28.0      28.0
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =   7
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.9597
     R-SQUARED (Y = X) =     0.9267
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      1.650 SECONDS -  10 LOOPS  GAP =   3.32779%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        380.4         47.9        428.3   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        380.4         47.9        428.3
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =        701.6        225.3        927.0   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        701.6        225.3        927.0
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       1414.9        105.2       1520.1   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       1414.9        105.2       1520.1
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =       2497.0        378.4       2875.4   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2497.0        378.4       2875.4
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      43540.7       3288.8      46829.5   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      43540.7       3288.8      46829.5
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =         17.4          8.7         16.3   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =         17.4          8.7         16.3
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  50
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP   11               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP   11
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =    2.417499
 BEST GAP VALUE     =    3.327794
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =    3.327794
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  51
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   2.1008              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    3.560 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
   -0.310              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               72.60     1039.998     1006.050      3.37       822.53                              788.58       788.58      4.13
  2     4.873      3.72     1030.343      999.270      3.11       821.71         0.82      0.100      790.63       790.63      3.78      2.42   2
  3     2.402      1.88     1034.081     1011.431      2.24       821.33         0.38      0.046      798.68       798.68      2.76      1.22   3
  4     3.570      2.89     1024.531     1000.996      2.35       820.93         0.40      0.049      797.39       798.68      2.71      1.77   4
  5     2.654      2.21     1031.834     1011.291      2.03       820.60         0.32      0.039      800.06       800.06      2.50      1.46   5
  6     3.405      2.94     1024.755     1006.412      1.82       820.26         0.34      0.041      801.92       801.92      2.24      1.65   6
  7     3.750      3.36     1026.198     1006.055      2.00       819.92         0.35      0.042      799.77       801.92      2.19      1.89   7
  8     3.909      3.64     1025.718     1007.074      1.85       819.52         0.39      0.048      800.88       801.92      2.15      2.18   8
  9     3.311      3.19     1028.904     1007.734      2.10       819.21         0.31      0.038      798.04       801.92      2.11      1.78   9
 10     3.560      3.56     1021.964                              818.84         0.37      0.045                                               10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     1.3212 B =    -0.2687 R-SQUARED =      86.30 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     2.0517%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 15347645.36
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 15276997.16
               DIFFERENCE              =    70648.20
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.4603 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP  11)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
  1017  1020  1019      133.46     96.89    -27.40      3.41
  1025  1026  1001      141.28    183.08     29.59      3.28
  1056  1017  1056       13.21     27.14    105.42      3.10
  1017  1020            366.46    312.31    -14.78      2.94
  1020  1017            602.74    533.15    -11.55      2.92
  1020  1017  1056      462.44    406.08    -12.19      2.70
  1019  1020  1017      296.68    251.98    -15.07      2.70
  1018  1043  1047      364.84    416.83     14.25      2.63
  1043  1047  1048      409.71    463.66     13.17      2.58
  1043  1047            413.11    466.13     12.83      2.53
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    1 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  2 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
    6 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  52
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER   11      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     2.199    56     1     6.51      6    48.92    0      7     55.44  0.079
  2     0.559    47     2     0.71      2    33.08    2      6     33.78  0.018
  3     0.355    47     0     0.00      1     0.44    3      4      0.44  0.000
  4     0.174    47     1     1.09      0     0.00    4      5      1.09  0.069
  5     0.093    47     0     0.00      0     0.00    5      5      0.00  0.000
  6     0.039    45     0     0.00      0     0.00    5      5      0.00  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    5 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    5 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION   7 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.01998 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1036 -       0.02
 OUT PROFILES -   1029 -       0.41
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP  11)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1026  1018  1043   -197.88   206.87   404.75    551.92   486.07    595.53
 2  1026  1018  1056   -159.52   216.17   375.69     99.30    91.56    107.14
 3  1055  1047  1048    113.52   310.87   197.34    329.21   355.22    374.66
 4  1032  1031  1022    112.07   492.24   380.17    302.02   317.03    378.89*+
 5  1060  1011  1003   -102.54    22.09   124.63    364.19   319.37    338.09*+
 6  1060  1011  1004    -91.31    29.41   120.72    160.84   128.56    131.01*+
 7  1055  1029  1028    -85.59   216.34   301.92    217.22   205.62    230.75
 8  1056  1018  1043    -84.46   286.86   371.32    224.15   211.66    249.06
 9  1028  1029  1021     80.64   223.62   142.98     21.55    28.74     22.97
10  1055  1029  1033     75.34   216.34   140.99     41.12    52.72     43.68
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 15172147.55
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 15105566.66
               DIFFERENCE              =    66580.89
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.4388 %
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  53
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER  11
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  44.70% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    36.27    44.70    56.63    76.39    86.63    93.13    99.88
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                0.45
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =          7.04 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =      2.61 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =       4.83 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =           39.06 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =    7.33 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:     18.77 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =  295
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     75.64 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    75.38    75.64    76.92    80.00    81.79    87.69    95.64
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =       3.434 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
    9478417.097    9525418.592      47001.496     0.00496
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     36720.57  37202.45   -481.88     -1.30
  SECONDARY STOPS   45284.88  42749.62   2535.26      5.93
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    380.44    385.14     -4.69     -1.22
  QUEUING DELAYS      701.62    648.07     53.54      8.26
  CRUISE TIMES       1414.94   1419.53     -4.59     -0.32
  TOTAL TIME         2497.00   2452.73     44.26      1.80
  PCU-DISTANCE      43540.72  43699.40   -158.68     -0.36
  SPEED                17.44     17.82     -0.38     -2.13
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1018  1026      1.0000      0.9088 *     0.0912        47.7      38.7
  1011  1003      0.5057 *    0.4375 *     0.0682        32.9      32.9
  1026  1018      1.0000      0.9557 *     0.0443        47.7      28.7
  1030  1009      0.7825 *    0.7584 *     0.0241        20.5      20.5
  1011  1004      0.9402 *    0.9571 *     0.0169        19.5      19.5
  1031  1022      0.3731 *    0.3855 *     0.0124        46.3      46.3
  1019  1002      0.6567 *    0.6640 *     0.0073        28.0      28.0
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =   7
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.9717
     R-SQUARED (Y = X) =     0.9570
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      1.712 SECONDS -  11 LOOPS  GAP =   3.43436%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        385.1         43.5        428.7   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        385.1         43.5        428.7
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =        648.1        174.4        822.5   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        648.1        174.4        822.5
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       1419.5         95.4       1514.9   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       1419.5         95.4       1514.9
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =       2452.7        313.3       2766.0   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2452.7        313.3       2766.0
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      43699.4       2967.7      46667.1   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      43699.4       2967.7      46667.1
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =         17.8          9.5         16.9   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =         17.8          9.5         16.9
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  54
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP   12               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP   12
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =    2.051679
 BEST GAP VALUE     =    3.327794
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =    3.327794
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  55
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   1.4452              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    3.032 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
   -0.050              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               72.03     1023.256      989.279      3.43       816.32                              782.34       782.34      4.16
  2     5.425      4.13     1016.170      989.785      2.67       815.38         0.93      0.114      789.00       789.00      3.24      2.75   2
  3     2.550      1.99     1017.238      998.514      1.88       815.03         0.35      0.043      796.31       796.31      2.30      1.33   3
  4     5.569      4.61     1013.290      989.222      2.43       814.52         0.51      0.063      790.45       796.31      2.24      2.74   4
  5     2.719      2.31     1017.157     1001.206      1.59       814.18         0.34      0.041      798.23       798.23      1.96      1.85   5
  6     2.990      2.62     1012.907      997.689      1.53       813.94         0.24      0.029      798.73       798.73      1.87      1.50   6
  7     4.613      4.24     1020.844     1001.219      1.96       813.59         0.36      0.044      793.96       798.73      1.83      2.33   7
  8     2.797      2.65     1013.859      999.799      1.41       813.32         0.27      0.033      799.26       799.26      1.73      1.80   8
  9     2.456      2.38     1014.367      999.916      1.45       813.15         0.173     0.021      798.70       799.26      1.71      1.23   9
 10     3.032      3.03     1011.529                              812.93         0.22      0.027                                               10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     1.0610 B =    -0.2412 R-SQUARED =      97.72 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     1.6649%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 15105566.66
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 15034153.56
               DIFFERENCE              =    71413.10
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.4728 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP  12)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
 C  12 (1056) 1055        7.03     21.52    206.00      3.83
  1060  1011  1004      144.69    191.06     32.04      3.58
  1011  1060            530.48    615.71     16.07      3.56
  1049  1044  1042       28.01     49.01     74.94      3.38
  1060  1011            517.25    596.53     15.33      3.36
  1011  1060  1009      255.85    310.43     21.33      3.24
  1019  1020  1017      251.98    204.55    -18.82      3.14
  1018  1043            869.35    962.65     10.73      3.08
  1055  1047            584.07    512.55    -12.24      3.05
  1002  1001  1026      128.31    164.54     28.24      2.99
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    1 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  2 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
    4 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  56
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER   12      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     2.322    56     3    13.86      3    16.37    0      6     30.23  0.039
  2     0.521    47     3     1.48      1     0.33    2      6      1.80  0.003
  3     0.441    47     1     0.11      1     0.16    4      6      0.26  0.000
  4     0.247    47     0     0.00      0     0.00    6      6      0.00  0.000
  5     0.117    47     1     0.27      0     0.00    6      7      0.27  0.000
  6     0.049    46     1     0.27      0     0.00    6      7      0.27  0.000
  7     0.006    44     1     0.27      0     0.00    6      7      0.27  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    6 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    1 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    5 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION   8 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.05038 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1038 -       0.02
 OUT PROFILES -   1029 -       1.55
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP  12)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1055  1047  1049   -145.68   162.19   307.88      1.96     2.51      2.07
 2  1055  1047  1043   -138.60   162.19   300.80      8.78    11.20      9.26
 3  1055  1047  1044    -98.16   162.19   260.36    125.54   127.19    132.33
 4  1055  1029  1033     94.47   225.69   131.22     29.51    41.12     31.50
 5  1056  1018  1026     87.39   351.06   263.67    159.17   167.61    182.54
 6  1055  1029  1028    -82.90   225.69   308.58    228.83   217.22    244.27
 7  1002  1019  1025    -62.35    96.94   159.29    587.71   557.45    606.15
 8  1026  1018  1056     60.12   322.15   262.03     94.40    99.30    107.41
 9  1018  1056  1017    -57.79    29.39    87.18    580.88   538.61    544.50
10  1018  1056  1055    -57.79    26.06    83.85    104.12    68.17     67.74
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 15080073.12
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 15045956.27
               DIFFERENCE              =    34116.85
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.2262 %
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  57
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER  12
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  41.69% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    33.25    41.69    53.01    72.89    85.18    92.17    99.64
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                0.52
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =          8.23 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =      3.06 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =       5.67 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =           38.29 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =    5.68 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:     14.84 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =  282
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     72.31 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    72.05    72.31    74.36    77.18    84.10    91.79    97.18
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =       1.925 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
    9440737.614    9452923.554      12185.940     0.00129
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     37202.45  36311.93    890.52      2.45
  SECONDARY STOPS   42749.62  39524.97   3224.65      8.16
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    385.14    390.10     -4.96     -1.27
  QUEUING DELAYS      648.07    631.13     16.95      2.69
  CRUISE TIMES       1419.53   1414.67      4.85      0.34
  TOTAL TIME         2452.73   2435.89     16.84      0.69
  PCU-DISTANCE      43699.40  43541.38    158.02      0.36
  SPEED                17.82     17.87     -0.06     -0.33
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1011  1003      0.5755 *    0.5057 *     0.0698        32.9      32.9
  1026  1018      0.9859 *    1.0000       0.0141        47.7      47.7
  1011  1004      0.9458 *    0.9402 *     0.0055        19.5      19.5
  1030  1009      0.7778 *    0.7825 *     0.0047        20.5      20.5
  1019  1002      0.6522 *    0.6567 *     0.0045        28.0      28.0
  1031  1022      0.3693 *    0.3731 *     0.0039        46.3      46.3
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =   6
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.9856
     R-SQUARED (Y = X) =     0.9811
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      1.778 SECONDS -  12 LOOPS  GAP =   1.92541%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        390.1         44.0        434.1   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        390.1         44.0        434.1
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =        631.1        154.0        785.2   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        631.1        154.0        785.2
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       1414.7         93.3       1508.0   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       1414.7         93.3       1508.0
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =       2435.9        291.4       2727.3   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2435.9        291.4       2727.3
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      43541.4       2943.8      46485.2   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      43541.4       2943.8      46485.2
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =         17.9         10.1         17.0   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =         17.9         10.1         17.0
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  58
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP   13               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP   13
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =    1.664906
 BEST GAP VALUE     =    1.925415
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =    1.925415
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  59
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   1.4272              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    2.128 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
   -0.136              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               77.57     1019.542      999.956      1.96       813.88                              794.29       794.29      2.41
  2     2.956      2.36     1015.455     1000.158      1.53       813.59         0.29      0.036      798.29       798.29      1.88      1.50   2
  3     3.137      2.59     1013.824      997.957      1.59       813.35         0.24      0.029      797.48       798.29      1.85      1.57   3
  4     3.486      2.98     1012.497      996.434      1.61       813.07         0.28      0.034      797.00       798.29      1.82      1.84   4
  5     2.453      2.15     1011.670      997.707      1.40       812.87         0.199     0.024      798.91       798.91      1.72      1.35   5
  6     2.911      2.63     1010.707      997.499      1.32       812.67         0.20      0.025      799.46       799.46      1.63      1.45   6
  7     2.575      2.39     1010.415      997.853      1.26       812.50         0.171     0.021      799.93       799.93      1.55      1.30   7
  8     2.011      1.90     1009.576      999.522      1.01       812.37         0.126     0.0156     802.32       802.32      1.24      1.01   8
  9     3.374      3.30     1010.949      996.724      1.43       812.20         0.170     0.021      797.97       802.32      1.22      1.69   9
 10     2.128      2.13     1011.544                              812.05         0.15      0.0186                                              10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     1.6190 B =    -0.6466 R-SQUARED =      88.77 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     1.1368%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 15045956.27
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 15012356.56
               DIFFERENCE              =    33599.72
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.2233 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP  13)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
  1004  1011  1060      188.21    235.42     25.08      3.24
 C  20 (1004) 1011      137.98    170.89     23.85      2.65
 C  20 (1003) 1011      205.40    172.64    -15.95      2.38
  1026  1025            344.23    305.46    -11.26      2.15
  1017  1020  1019       69.79     54.14    -22.43      1.99
 C  12 (1056) 1055       21.52     31.11     44.57      1.87
  1012  1003  1012       55.95     43.40    -22.43      1.78
  1060  1011  1004      191.06    214.95     12.51      1.68
  1049  1044  1042       49.01     38.02    -22.43      1.67
  1060  1011            596.53    637.85      6.93      1.66
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    0 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  1 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
    6 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  60
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER   13      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     1.362    56     2    12.96      4    16.24    0      6     29.20  0.069
  2     0.248    47     2     1.62      2     1.07    2      6      2.70  0.003
  3     0.143    47     2     0.28      0     0.00    3      5      0.28  0.000
  4     0.073    47     0     0.00      0     0.00    5      5      0.00  0.000
  5     0.017    46     0     0.00      0     0.00    5      5      0.00  0.000
  6     0.007    43     0     0.00      0     0.00    5      5      0.00  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    6 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    1 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    5 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION   7 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.04119 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1038 -       0.01
 OUT PROFILES -   1029 -       1.25
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP  13)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1055  1047  1043    101.05   261.01   159.96      7.66     8.78      8.48
 2  1055  1047  1049    100.63   261.01   160.37      1.45     1.96      1.60
 3  1055  1047  1044     88.50   261.01   172.51    121.72   125.54    134.84
 4  1001  1026  1025     86.69   283.10   196.41    100.07   103.47    111.36
 5  1055  1047  1048     85.85   261.01   175.16    300.17   312.72    332.53
 6  1025  1026  1001     77.56   186.19   108.63    188.34   196.64    199.91
 7  1001  1002  1001     70.81   110.96    40.15      0.00    12.25      0.00
 8  1001  1002  1019     70.81   104.30    33.49    418.06   452.22    432.83
 9  1001  1002  1030     70.81   107.63    36.82    258.11   259.00    267.22
10  1028  1029  1021     70.09   250.17   180.09     12.02    15.72     12.97
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 14989330.95
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 14963979.44
               DIFFERENCE              =    25351.51
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.1691 %
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  61
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER  13
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  47.35% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    37.83    47.35    62.29    83.13    90.60    94.22   100.00
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                0.31
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =          4.80 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =      1.79 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =       3.16 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =           38.24 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =    5.54 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:     14.49 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =  299
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     76.67 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    76.67    76.67    79.49    82.31    85.90    92.31    98.21
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =       2.008 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
    9366643.323    9384112.294      17468.971     0.00187
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     36311.93  35078.08   1233.84      3.52
  SECONDARY STOPS   39524.97  42310.21  -2785.24     -6.58
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    390.10    378.94     11.15      2.94
  QUEUING DELAYS      631.13    628.12      3.01      0.48
  CRUISE TIMES       1414.67   1413.47      1.20      0.08
  TOTAL TIME         2435.89   2420.53     15.36      0.63
  PCU-DISTANCE      43541.38  43490.63     50.75      0.12
  SPEED                17.87     17.97     -0.09     -0.51
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1019  1002      1.0000      0.6522 *     0.3478        28.0      27.0
  1026  1018      0.9444 *    0.9859 *     0.0415        47.7      47.7
  1011  1003      0.6019 *    0.5755 *     0.0264        32.9      32.9
  1031  1022      0.3766 *    0.3693 *     0.0073        46.3      46.3
  1011  1004      0.9529 *    0.9458 *     0.0071        19.5      19.5
  1030  1009      0.7809 *    0.7778 *     0.0031        20.5      20.5
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =   6
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.6741
     R-SQUARED (Y = X) =     0.5878
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      1.839 SECONDS -  13 LOOPS  GAP =   2.00809%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        378.9         43.1        422.1   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        378.9         43.1        422.1
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =        628.1        144.3        772.4   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        628.1        144.3        772.4
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       1413.5         92.7       1506.2   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       1413.5         92.7       1506.2
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =       2420.5        280.1       2700.7   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2420.5        280.1       2700.7
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      43490.6       2929.2      46419.9   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      43490.6       2929.2      46419.9
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =         18.0         10.5         17.2   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =         18.0         10.5         17.2
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  62
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP   14               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP   14
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =    1.136792
 BEST GAP VALUE     =    1.925415
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =    1.925415
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  63
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   1.1396              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    1.995 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
   -0.327              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               79.36     1014.077      994.309      1.99       811.53                              791.77       791.77      2.44
  2     2.581      2.10     1007.937      993.070      1.50       811.28         0.26      0.031      796.41       796.41      1.83      1.29   2
  3     2.910      2.44     1010.279      996.629      1.37       811.06         0.22      0.027      797.41       797.41      1.68      1.45   3
  4     3.364      2.92     1005.663      992.518      1.32       810.83         0.23      0.029      797.68       797.68      1.62      1.71   4
  5     2.166      1.92     1008.786      996.346      1.25       810.69         0.143     0.0176     798.25       798.25      1.53      1.09   5
  6     1.984      1.80     1004.604      993.170      1.15       810.57         0.121     0.0149     799.13       799.13      1.41      0.97   6
  7     2.916      2.72     1006.927      994.394      1.26       810.40         0.169     0.021      797.87       799.13      1.39      1.48   7
  8     2.400      2.29     1004.589      993.213      1.15       810.25         0.146     0.0180     798.88       799.13      1.37      1.30   8
  9     2.494      2.44     1007.890      996.533      1.14       810.11         0.144     0.0178     798.75       799.13      1.35      1.30   9
 10     1.995      2.00     1002.870                              810.00         0.11      0.0138                                              10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     0.7200 B =    -0.1951 R-SQUARED =      84.89 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     1.3273%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 14963979.44
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 14934243.17
               DIFFERENCE              =    29736.27
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.1987 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP  14)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
 C  16 (1025) 1019       62.59     81.51     30.23      2.23
 C  24 (1060) 1009       66.05     85.25     29.07      2.21
  1020  1019  1002      294.97    259.59    -12.00      2.13
  1017  1056  1018      385.42    422.74      9.68      1.86
  1019  1025  1017      453.93    494.32      8.90      1.86
 C  20 (1003) 1011      172.64    149.31    -13.51      1.84
  1056  1018            438.32    477.11      8.85      1.81
  1019  1020  1017      188.21    164.62    -12.54      1.78
  1025  1017  1056      789.48    839.94      6.39      1.77
 C  20 (1004) 1011      170.89    194.31     13.71      1.73
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    0 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  1 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
    5 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  64
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER   14      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     1.126    56     1     5.60      4    17.93    0      5     23.52  0.018
  2     0.240    47     2     1.27      0     0.00    3      5      1.27  0.002
  3     0.141    47     1     0.11      0     0.00    4      5      0.11  0.000
  4     0.063    47     0     0.00      0     0.00    5      5      0.00  0.000
  5     0.025    47     0     0.00      0     0.00    5      5      0.00  0.000
  6     0.011    45     0     0.00      0     0.00    5      5      0.00  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    6 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    1 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    5 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION   7 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.03466 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1035 -       0.01
 OUT PROFILES -   1029 -       1.03
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP  14)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1056  1018  1026     94.57   420.23   325.65    153.87   157.95    182.37
 2  1002  1019  1020     87.44   159.50    72.06    367.73   389.45    390.62
 3  1001  1026  1025     73.87   318.08   244.22     97.43   100.07    110.33
 4  1001  1002  1019     67.72   108.30    40.58    407.30   418.06    422.37
 5  1001  1002  1001     67.72   114.97    47.25      0.00     0.00      0.00
 6  1001  1002  1030     67.72   111.64    43.92    253.47   258.11    262.84
 7  1055  1029  1033     55.76   254.50   198.74     17.90    22.79     19.40
 8  1001  1026  1018     54.96   299.31   244.34    555.21   565.41    628.71*+
 9  1025  1026  1001    -54.72    82.88   137.60    182.77   188.34    185.10
10  1055  1047  1048     49.94   224.25   174.31    287.25   300.17    312.07
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 14952446.77
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 14933190.33
               DIFFERENCE              =    19256.43
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.1288 %
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  65
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER  14
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  53.98% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    42.89    53.98    69.88    85.78    92.17    94.22   100.00
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                0.26
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =          3.96 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =      1.47 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =       2.75 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =           38.00 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =    3.74 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:      9.85 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =  304
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     77.95 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    77.18    77.95    78.21    86.15    89.23    93.85    98.46
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =       1.535 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
    9341937.548    9355110.648      13173.101     0.00141
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     35078.08  35836.56   -758.48     -2.12
  SECONDARY STOPS   42310.21  40965.55   1344.66      3.28
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    378.94    379.22     -0.27     -0.07
  QUEUING DELAYS      628.12    615.65     12.47      2.03
  CRUISE TIMES       1413.47   1413.21      0.26      0.02
  TOTAL TIME         2420.53   2408.08     12.45      0.52
  PCU-DISTANCE      43490.63  43473.52     17.11      0.04
  SPEED                17.97     18.05     -0.09     -0.48
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1026  1018      0.9142 *    0.9444 *     0.0303        47.7      47.7
  1011  1003      0.6301 *    0.6019 *     0.0281        32.9      32.9
  1011  1004      0.9720 *    0.9529 *     0.0191        19.5      19.5
  1030  1009      0.7910 *    0.7809 *     0.0101        20.5      20.5
  1031  1022      0.3749 *    0.3766 *     0.0017        46.3      46.3
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =   5
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.9916
     R-SQUARED (Y = X) =     0.9906
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      1.899 SECONDS -  14 LOOPS  GAP =   1.53547%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        379.2         42.3        421.5   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        379.2         42.3        421.5
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =        615.6        140.5        756.1   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        615.6        140.5        756.1
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       1413.2         91.5       1504.7   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       1413.2         91.5       1504.7
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =       2408.1        274.2       2682.3   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2408.1        274.2       2682.3
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      43473.5       2895.9      46369.4   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      43473.5       2895.9      46369.4
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =         18.1         10.6         17.3   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =         18.1         10.6         17.3
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  66
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP   15               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP   15
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =    1.327256
 BEST GAP VALUE     =    1.535472
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =    1.535472
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  67
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   1.0615              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    1.991 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
   -0.112              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               80.69     1011.805      996.651      1.52       811.58                              796.42       796.42      1.87
  2     2.407      1.99     1011.424      999.044      1.24       811.39         0.186     0.023      799.01       799.01      1.53      1.23   2
  3     2.312      1.96     1012.081      998.481      1.36       811.25         0.143     0.0176     797.65       799.01      1.51      1.15   3
  4     2.506      2.18     1010.846      999.813      1.10       811.08         0.166     0.020      800.05       800.05      1.36      1.35   4
  5     3.149      2.82     1011.352     1000.248      1.11       810.91         0.177     0.022      799.80       800.05      1.34      1.60   5
  6     2.193      2.01     1009.763      999.070      1.07       810.78         0.121     0.0150     800.09       800.09      1.32      1.12   6
  7     2.445      2.30     1010.602     1000.886      0.97       810.65         0.131     0.0162     800.94       800.94      1.20      1.23   7
  8     1.503      1.43     1008.041      998.817      0.92       810.58         0.073     0.0090     801.36       801.36      1.14      0.75   8
  9     2.683      2.63     1009.169      998.570      1.06       810.46         0.124     0.0153     799.86       801.36      1.12      1.35   9
 10     1.991      1.99     1008.031                              810.35         0.11      0.0131                                              10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     0.8541 B =    -0.3404 R-SQUARED =      93.40 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     1.0832%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 14933190.33
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 14911659.47
               DIFFERENCE              =    21530.87
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.1442 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP  15)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
  1030  1002  1001      149.79    123.54    -17.52      2.25
  1002  1001  1026      149.47    123.28    -17.52      2.24
 C  24 (1063) 1009       96.62     77.97    -19.31      2.00
 C  24 (1060) 1009       85.25    103.95     21.93      1.92
  1002  1001            412.60    376.18     -8.83      1.83
  1020  1019  1002      259.59    232.90    -10.28      1.70
  1018 (1043)C  10       51.60     63.95     23.94      1.62
 C  16 (1025) 1019       81.51     96.28     18.12      1.57
 C  20 (1003) 1011      149.31    131.39    -12.00      1.51
  1017  1020  1019       42.97     34.67    -19.31      1.33
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    0 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  1 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
    5 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  68
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER   15      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     1.146    56     3    12.71      2     4.57    0      5     17.28  0.011
  2     0.152    47     2     1.96      1     0.21    2      5      2.16  0.003
  3     0.084    47     1     0.12      0     0.00    3      4      0.12  0.000
  4     0.041    47     0     0.00      0     0.00    4      4      0.00  0.000
  5     0.014    45     0     0.00      0     0.00    4      4      0.00  0.000
  6     0.006    42     0     0.00      0     0.00    4      4      0.00  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    6 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    1 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    5 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION   7 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.02812 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1036 -       0.00
 OUT PROFILES -   1029 -       0.85
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP  15)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1025  1026  1018     73.01   181.93   108.91    303.81   311.15    322.62*+
 2  1025  1026  1001     69.76   181.93   112.16    182.53   182.77    193.83
 3  1001  1026  1025     57.17   313.46   256.29     94.49    97.43    106.77
 4  1055  1047  1048     55.41   271.34   215.93    279.30   287.25    310.57
 5  1032  1031  1022    -53.33   441.09   494.42    311.08   303.53    381.47*+
 6  1056  1018  1043    -51.08   318.63   369.71    240.80   238.15    271.81
 7  1002  1019  1020     50.37   160.99   110.61    352.72   367.73    374.68
 8  1055  1047  1049     48.13   271.34   223.21      0.93     1.17      1.03
 9  1055  1047  1043     47.93   271.34   223.41      5.82     6.20      6.47
10  1056  1018  1026    -45.82   318.63   364.44    151.28   153.87    170.76
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 14960769.95
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 14946415.85
               DIFFERENCE              =    14354.10
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0959 %
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  69
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER  15
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  55.30% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    42.05    55.30    70.96    86.87    92.05    99.52   100.00
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                0.24
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =          3.52 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =      1.31 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =       2.24 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =           38.84 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =    3.30 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:      8.51 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =  309
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     79.23 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    78.97    79.23    80.77    87.18    90.51    96.92    99.23
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =       1.505 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
    9358937.930    9369517.168      10579.237     0.00113
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     35836.56  35176.63    659.93      1.88
  SECONDARY STOPS   40965.55  43162.14  -2196.59     -5.09
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    379.22    379.48     -0.26     -0.07
  QUEUING DELAYS      615.65    618.46     -2.81     -0.45
  CRUISE TIMES       1413.21   1412.14      1.07      0.08
  TOTAL TIME         2408.08   2410.07     -2.00     -0.08
  PCU-DISTANCE      43473.52  43438.18     35.34      0.08
  SPEED                18.05     18.02      0.03      0.16
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1011  1004      1.0000      0.9720 *     0.0280        19.5      19.2
  1026  1018      0.8920 *    0.9142 *     0.0222        47.7      47.7
  1030  1009      0.7977 *    0.7910 *     0.0067        20.5      20.5
  1031  1022      0.3815 *    0.3749 *     0.0066        46.3      46.3
  1011  1003      0.6248 *    0.6301 *     0.0052        32.9      32.9
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =   5
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.9943
     R-SQUARED (Y = X) =     0.9941
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      1.958 SECONDS -  15 LOOPS  GAP =   1.50532%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        379.5         42.4        421.9   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        379.5         42.4        421.9
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =        618.5        138.6        757.0   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        618.5        138.6        757.0
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       1412.1         91.7       1503.8   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       1412.1         91.7       1503.8
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =       2410.1        272.6       2682.7   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2410.1        272.6       2682.7
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      43438.2       2899.9      46338.1   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      43438.2       2899.9      46338.1
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =         18.0         10.6         17.3   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =         18.0         10.6         17.3
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  70
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP   16               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP   16
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =    1.083212
 BEST GAP VALUE     =    1.505318
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =    1.505318
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  71
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   0.7748              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    2.625 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
    0.286              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               80.37     1012.988      998.150      1.49       810.69                              795.85       795.85      1.83
  2     2.587      2.13     1014.416     1003.117      1.13       810.50         0.192     0.024      799.20       799.20      1.39      1.29   2
  3     3.173      2.70     1013.228     1003.018      1.02       810.32         0.179     0.022      800.11       800.11      1.26      1.59   3
  4     1.705      1.48     1013.744     1003.293      1.04       810.23         0.087     0.0108     799.78       800.11      1.25      0.86   4
  5     1.760      1.55     1010.410     1001.845      0.85       810.14         0.092     0.0113     801.57       801.57      1.06      0.91   5
  6     2.568      2.33     1012.261     1002.569      0.97       810.03         0.111     0.0137     800.34       801.57      1.04      1.29   6
  7     2.803      2.61     1011.170     1001.243      0.99       809.90         0.133     0.0164     799.97       801.57      1.03      1.57   7
  8     2.633      2.52     1012.553     1003.853      0.87       809.76         0.133     0.0164     801.06       801.57      1.01      1.60   8
  9     1.725      1.68     1009.666     1001.903      0.77       809.69         0.074     0.0091     801.93       801.93      0.96      0.90   9
 10     2.625      2.62     1011.231                              809.59         0.10      0.0127                                              10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     0.3080 B =    -0.1502 R-SQUARED =      84.37 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     0.9437%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 14946415.85
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 14925155.15
               DIFFERENCE              =    21260.70
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.1422 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP  16)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
 C  27 (1021) 1003       19.14     27.46     43.43      1.72
  1019  1020  1017      151.71    131.96    -13.02      1.66
 C  38 (1021) 1003       18.75     26.50     41.33      1.63
  1025  1026            336.20    309.19     -8.03      1.50
 C  20 (1003) 1011      131.39    116.20    -11.56      1.37
  1011 (1060)C  20       25.97     33.18     27.74      1.32
  1030  1002  1001      123.54    109.27    -11.55      1.32
  1002  1001  1026      123.28    109.07    -11.53      1.32
  1010 (1063)C  25       56.58     47.44    -16.16      1.27
  1009  1030  1002      702.80    670.15     -4.65      1.25
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    0 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  1 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
    4 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  72
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER   16      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     0.734    56     2     7.79      3     4.76    0      5     12.55  0.063
  2     0.153    47     1     0.33      1     0.14    3      5      0.47  0.001
  3     0.076    47     0     0.00      1     0.11    4      5      0.11  0.000
  4     0.035    47     0     0.00      0     0.00    5      5      0.00  0.000
  5     0.012    45     0     0.00      0     0.00    5      5      0.00  0.000
  6     0.004    42     0     0.00      0     0.00    5      5      0.00  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    6 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    1 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    5 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION   7 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.02282 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1035 -       0.00
 OUT PROFILES -   1029 -       0.70
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP  16)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1025  1026  1001    -77.06    64.66   141.72    181.96   182.53    182.95
 2  1025  1026  1018    -54.95    64.66   119.62    305.79   303.81    307.47*+
 3  1056  1018  1026     50.50   400.43   349.93    151.11   151.28    177.44
 4  1060  1011  1004     49.66    94.66    45.00    195.52   206.33    201.30
 5  1025  1019  1020     42.26    47.49     5.24    133.92   476.13    134.42
 6  1002  1019  1020     41.96   161.44   119.49    340.88   352.72    361.87
 7  1055  1047  1048     41.73   250.57   208.83    269.31   279.30    296.16
 8  1025  1019  1002     41.71    47.49     5.79    842.48  1169.86    845.65*
 9  1060  1011  1003     37.69    94.66    56.96    378.88   388.56    390.09*+
10  1056  1018  1043     30.62   400.43   369.82    240.96   240.80    282.95
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 14947470.55
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 14936477.41
               DIFFERENCE              =    10993.14
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0735 %
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  73
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER  16
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  59.88% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    46.99    59.88    74.22    87.59    92.41    99.52   100.00
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                0.22
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =          3.29 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =      1.23 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =       2.28 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =           38.17 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =    3.42 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:      8.95 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =  309
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     79.23 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    79.23    79.23    80.26    85.13    91.54    95.38    98.21
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =       1.446 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
    9352903.849    9359992.634       7088.784     0.00076
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     35176.63  36916.16  -1739.53     -4.71
  SECONDARY STOPS   43162.14  42951.08    211.06      0.49
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    379.48    388.65     -9.18     -2.36
  QUEUING DELAYS      618.46    613.53      4.93      0.80
  CRUISE TIMES       1412.14   1411.57      0.56      0.04
  TOTAL TIME         2410.07   2413.76     -3.68     -0.15
  PCU-DISTANCE      43438.18  43419.22     18.96      0.04
  SPEED                18.02     17.99      0.04      0.20
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1019  1002      0.7225 *    1.0000       0.2775        28.0      28.0
  1011  1003      0.5941 *    0.6248 *     0.0308        32.9      32.9
  1026  1018      0.8963 *    0.8920 *     0.0043        47.7      47.7
  1030  1009      0.7993 *    0.7977 *     0.0016        20.5      20.5
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =   5
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.7491
     R-SQUARED (Y = X) =     0.5121
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      2.016 SECONDS -  16 LOOPS  GAP =   1.44565%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        388.7         42.2        430.9   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        388.7         42.2        430.9
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =        613.5        145.4        758.9   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        613.5        145.4        758.9
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       1411.6         91.3       1502.9   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       1411.6         91.3       1502.9
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =       2413.8        278.9       2692.7   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2413.8        278.9       2692.7
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      43419.2       2886.5      46305.7   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      43419.2       2886.5      46305.7
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =         18.0         10.3         17.2   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =         18.0         10.3         17.2
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  74
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP   17               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP   17
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =    0.943704
 BEST GAP VALUE     =    1.445651
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =    1.445651
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  75
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   0.7687              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    1.991 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
    0.061              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               82.78     1012.314      997.827      1.45       810.90                              796.41       796.41      1.79
  2     2.071      1.75     1009.467      999.764      0.97       810.75         0.150     0.0185     801.05       801.05      1.20      1.03   2
  3     2.616      2.27     1011.059     1001.390      0.97       810.62         0.127     0.0157     800.96       801.05      1.18      1.31   3
  4     2.307      2.05     1010.031     1001.988      0.80       810.51         0.113     0.0140     802.47       802.47      0.99      1.18   4
  5     1.917      1.74     1010.189     1002.834      0.73       810.43         0.077     0.0095     803.08       803.08      0.91      0.96   5
  6     2.133      1.97     1010.538     1002.102      0.84       810.36         0.079     0.0097     801.92       803.08      0.90      1.07   6
  7     1.646      1.55     1010.634     1003.982      0.66       810.29         0.069     0.0086     803.63       803.63      0.82      0.95   7
  8     2.654      2.57     1009.795     1001.503      0.83       810.20         0.088     0.0109     801.91       803.63      0.81      1.32   8
  9     1.362      1.33     1009.179     1001.480      0.77       810.14         0.057     0.0070     802.44       803.63      0.80      0.87   9
 10     1.991      1.99     1008.900                              810.06         0.08      0.0095                                              10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     0.2934 B =    -0.2388 R-SQUARED =      88.28 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     0.7834%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 14936477.41
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 14921617.06
               DIFFERENCE              =    14860.35
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0995 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP  17)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
  1030  1002  1001      109.27     93.54    -14.40      1.56
  1002  1001  1026      109.07     93.36    -14.40      1.56
 C  15 (1029) 1021       29.12     36.98     26.98      1.37
  1026 (1001)C  23       35.43     43.05     21.49      1.22
  1002  1001            358.29    336.40     -6.11      1.17
  1019  1020  1017      131.96    120.52     -8.67      1.02
  1011 (1060)C  20       33.18     39.21     18.17      1.00
 C  16 (1025) 1019      108.39     98.22     -9.39      1.00
  1060  1011            644.75    620.50     -3.76      0.96
 C  20 (1003) 1011      116.20    106.17     -8.63      0.95
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    0 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  1 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
    5 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  76
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER   17      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     0.860    56     1     1.40      4    13.96    0      5     15.36  0.102
  2     0.193    47     2     0.42      0     0.00    1      3      0.42  0.001
  3     0.085    47     0     0.00      0     0.00    3      3      0.00  0.000
  4     0.049    47     0     0.00      0     0.00    3      3      0.00  0.000
  5     0.013    47     0     0.00      0     0.00    3      3      0.00  0.000
  6     0.006    44     0     0.00      0     0.00    3      3      0.00  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    7 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    1 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    6 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION   7 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.02116 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1035 -       0.01
 OUT PROFILES -   1029 -       0.59
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP  17)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1025  1026  1018     79.18   171.43    92.25    299.10   305.79    316.29*+
 2  1025  1026  1001     62.54   171.43   108.89    185.95   181.96    196.63
 3  1032  1031  1022    -60.31   392.29   452.60    318.47   309.64    381.94*+
 4  1002  1019  1025    -45.88   117.57   163.44    637.83   620.63    665.03
 5  1002  1030  1003    -44.29     8.29    52.59    379.73   110.40    112.11
 6  1025  1019  1002    -34.52     5.28    39.80   1173.91   842.48    838.50 +
 7  1025  1019  1020    -34.05     5.28    39.33    461.50   133.92    126.09
 8  1002  1030  1009    -30.49     5.03    35.52   1049.35   836.06    847.01 +
 9  1055  1047  1048     25.89   241.55   215.67    265.02   269.31    290.06
10  1019  1002  1019     25.29   116.14    90.85      0.00     0.00      0.00
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 14841803.71
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 14832101.00
               DIFFERENCE              =     9702.71
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0654 %
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  77
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER  17
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  67.11% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    53.86    67.11    78.19    89.76    94.82    99.76   100.00
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                0.17
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =          2.43 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =      0.91 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =       1.62 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =           38.00 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =    3.14 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:      8.27 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =  315
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     80.77 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    80.51    80.77    81.28    84.62    93.33    95.13    98.21
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =       0.913 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
    9250843.857    9258230.147       7386.290     0.00080
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     36916.16  34583.31   2332.85      6.75
  SECONDARY STOPS   42951.08  41489.81   1461.27      3.52
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    388.65    376.65     12.00      3.19
  QUEUING DELAYS      613.53    607.69      5.84      0.96
  CRUISE TIMES       1411.57   1412.89     -1.31     -0.09
  TOTAL TIME         2413.76   2397.22     16.53      0.69
  PCU-DISTANCE      43419.22  43456.52    -37.30     -0.09
  SPEED                17.99     18.13     -0.14     -0.77
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1019  1002      1.0000      0.7225 *     0.2775        28.0      27.4
  1030  1009      1.0000      0.7993 *     0.2007        20.5      18.4
  1011  1003      0.5755 *    0.5941 *     0.0186        32.9      32.9
  1026  1018      0.8872 *    0.8963 *     0.0090        47.7      47.7
  1031  1022      0.3886 *    0.3806 *     0.0080        46.3      46.3
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =   5
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.7734
     R-SQUARED (Y = X) =     0.6111
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      2.074 SECONDS -  17 LOOPS  GAP =   0.91331%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        376.7         40.8        417.5   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        376.7         40.8        417.5
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =        607.7        146.6        754.3   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        607.7        146.6        754.3
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       1412.9         89.5       1502.4   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       1412.9         89.5       1502.4
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =       2397.2        276.9       2674.1   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2397.2        276.9       2674.1
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      43456.5       2830.0      46286.5   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      43456.5       2830.0      46286.5
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =         18.1         10.2         17.3   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =         18.1         10.2         17.3
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  78
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP   18               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP   18
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =    0.783361
 BEST GAP VALUE     =    0.913312
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =    0.913312
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  79
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   0.6085              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    1.451 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
    0.007              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               82.75     1005.154      996.105      0.91       808.79                              799.74       799.74      1.12
  2     1.645      1.38     1005.913      997.867      0.81       808.72         0.074     0.0092     800.67       800.67      0.99      0.82   2
  3     2.593      2.24     1005.882      996.992      0.89       808.61         0.104     0.0129     799.72       800.67      0.98      1.30   3
  4     2.386      2.11     1006.225      998.500      0.77       808.51         0.107     0.0132     800.78       800.78      0.96      1.34   4
  5     2.842      2.59     1006.436      998.283      0.82       808.40         0.110     0.0136     800.24       800.78      0.94      1.42   5
  6     1.509      1.40     1006.119     1000.023      0.61       808.33         0.061     0.0076     802.24       802.24      0.75      0.81   6
  7     2.164      2.05     1006.124      998.226      0.79       808.27         0.066     0.0082     800.37       802.24      0.75      1.09   7
  8     2.027      1.96     1006.200      998.891      0.73       808.19         0.080     0.0099     800.88       802.24      0.74      1.32   8
  9     2.105      2.07     1006.128     1000.043      0.61       808.11         0.077     0.0095     802.03       802.24      0.73      1.29   9
 10     1.451      1.45     1006.047                              808.07         0.04      0.0055                                              10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     0.4988 B =    -0.3901 R-SQUARED =      69.86 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     0.6975%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 14832101.00
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 14819128.44
               DIFFERENCE              =    12972.57
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0875 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP  18)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
  1019  1020  1017      120.52     99.74    -17.25      1.98
 C  38 (1021) 1003       26.85     37.12     38.24      1.82
  1002  1030  1003      122.04    137.24     12.45      1.33
 C  27 (1021) 1003       26.81     33.77     25.95      1.26
  1030  1002  1001       93.54     81.90    -12.44      1.24
  1002  1001  1026       93.36     81.76    -12.43      1.24
  1019  1025  1017      496.37    522.88      5.34      1.17
  1017  1020            232.73    216.36     -7.03      1.09
 C  24 (1060) 1009      100.69     90.05    -10.57      1.09
  1025  1017  1056      854.60    886.73      3.76      1.09
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    0 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  1 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
    3 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  80
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER   18      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     0.937    56     3    11.74      1     4.60    0      4     16.34  0.079
  2     0.137    47     1     0.50      0     0.00    3      4      0.50  0.001
  3     0.046    47     0     0.00      0     0.00    4      4      0.00  0.000
  4     0.023    47     0     0.00      0     0.00    4      4      0.00  0.000
  5     0.007    47     0     0.00      0     0.00    4      4      0.00  0.000
  6     0.002    42     0     0.00      0     0.00    4      4      0.00  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    8 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    1 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    7 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION   7 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.01626 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1036 -       0.00
 OUT PROFILES -   1029 -       0.50
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP  18)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1032  1031  1022    -85.04   307.24   392.29    331.53   318.47    382.00*+
 2  1025  1019  1020     50.07    55.46     5.38    128.73   461.50    129.78
 3  1025  1019  1002     49.71    55.46     5.75    845.46  1173.91    852.36*
 4  1002  1019  1025    -46.07    97.13   143.20    655.72   637.83    676.28
 5  1001  1026  1025     38.30   313.60   275.30     92.26    94.38    104.27
 6  1030  1009  1063    -36.91    50.80    87.72    215.76   215.44    218.90
 7  1030  1009  1060    -36.91    47.47    84.38    767.91   761.21    779.09
 8  1030  1009  1030    -36.91    54.14    91.05      0.02     0.03      0.02
 9  1018  1026  1025     33.07   174.76   141.70    272.16   280.24    288.92
10  1020  1021  1029    -32.28   194.88   227.16    225.00   222.03    238.46
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 14862267.12
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 14852228.92
               DIFFERENCE              =    10038.20
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0675 %
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  81
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER  18
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  63.49% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    48.43    63.49    77.59    89.88    94.34    99.52   100.00
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                0.19
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =          2.78 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =      1.04 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =       1.90 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =           38.04 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =    2.69 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:      7.08 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =  312
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     80.00 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    78.72    80.00    82.82    87.69    93.08    96.15    98.46
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =       0.895 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
    9273373.271    9281009.976       7636.705     0.00082
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     34583.31  35734.38  -1151.07     -3.22
  SECONDARY STOPS   41489.81  41612.96   -123.15     -0.30
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    376.65    384.61     -7.96     -2.07
  QUEUING DELAYS      607.69    610.46     -2.78     -0.45
  CRUISE TIMES       1412.89   1411.43      1.46      0.10
  TOTAL TIME         2397.22   2406.50     -9.27     -0.39
  PCU-DISTANCE      43456.52  43409.05     47.46      0.11
  SPEED                18.13     18.04      0.09      0.50
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1019  1002      0.7218 *    1.0000       0.2782        28.0      28.0
  1026  1018      0.8701 *    0.8872 *     0.0172        47.7      47.7
  1011  1003      0.5601 *    0.5755 *     0.0154        32.9      32.9
  1031  1022      0.4006 *    0.3886 *     0.0120        46.3      46.3
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =   4
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.7933
     R-SQUARED (Y = X) =     0.3670
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      2.132 SECONDS -  18 LOOPS  GAP =   0.89518%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        384.6         41.7        426.3   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        384.6         41.7        426.3
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =        610.5        148.7        759.2   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        610.5        148.7        759.2
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       1411.4         90.4       1501.8   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       1411.4         90.4       1501.8
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =       2406.5        280.8       2687.3   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2406.5        280.8       2687.3
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      43409.1       2857.5      46266.6   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      43409.1       2857.5      46266.6
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =         18.0         10.2         17.2   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =         18.0         10.2         17.2
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  82
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP   19               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP   19
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =    0.697475
 BEST GAP VALUE     =    0.895184
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =    0.895184
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  83
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   0.6104              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    1.970 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
    0.009              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               84.77     1006.591      997.579      0.90       808.72                              799.71       799.71      1.11
  2     1.676      1.44     1004.956      995.623      0.94       808.64         0.076     0.0093     799.31       799.71      1.11      0.84   2
  3     1.914      1.68     1007.114     1000.488      0.66       808.55         0.089     0.0110     801.93       801.93      0.82      1.00   3
  4     1.814      1.62     1004.778      998.000      0.68       808.49         0.060     0.0074     801.72       801.93      0.81      0.90   4
  5     2.064      1.89     1006.451      999.778      0.67       808.42         0.070     0.0087     801.75       801.93      0.80      1.07   5
  6     1.848      1.72     1005.410      999.379      0.60       808.36         0.061     0.0075     802.33       802.33      0.75      0.94   6
  7     1.434      1.35     1005.956      999.885      0.61       808.32         0.044     0.0054     802.25       802.33      0.74      0.72   7
  8     1.841      1.77     1005.049      999.120      0.59       808.26         0.055     0.0068     802.33       802.33      0.73      0.92   8
  9     1.815      1.78     1004.961      998.864      0.61       808.21         0.054     0.0067     802.11       802.33      0.73      0.92   9
 10     1.970      1.97     1003.599                              808.15         0.06      0.0073                                              10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     0.0086 B =    -0.1542 R-SQUARED =      79.94 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     0.7151%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 14852228.92
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 14841781.57
               DIFFERENCE              =    10447.35
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0703 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP  19)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
  1019  1020  1017       99.74     84.54    -15.23      1.58
  1003  1030  1009      188.36    207.85     10.35      1.38
  1030  1002  1001       81.90     71.42    -12.80      1.20
  1002  1001  1026       81.76     71.30    -12.79      1.20
  1003  1030            282.25    301.83      6.94      1.15
  1030  1009  1063      245.85    264.12      7.43      1.14
  1020  1017            369.91    348.40     -5.81      1.13
  1020  1017  1056      251.61    234.35     -6.86      1.11
  1012  1003  1030      137.53    150.70      9.57      1.10
  1060  1009  1063      232.07    215.74     -7.04      1.09
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    0 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  1 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
    4 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  84
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER   19      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     0.756    56     3     5.69      2     8.08    0      5     13.77  0.063
  2     0.118    47     1     0.14      0     0.00    3      4      0.14  0.001
  3     0.054    47     0     0.00      0     0.00    4      4      0.00  0.000
  4     0.020    47     0     0.00      0     0.00    4      4      0.00  0.000
  5     0.007    46     0     0.00      0     0.00    4      4      0.00  0.000
  6     0.003    43     0     0.00      0     0.00    4      4      0.00  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    8 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    1 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    7 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION   7 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.01423 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1038 -       0.00
 OUT PROFILES -   1029 -       0.42
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP  19)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1002  1019  1025    -43.20    87.53   130.73    676.98   655.72    694.70
 2  1025  1019  1020    -41.44     5.32    46.76    456.45   128.73    123.97
 3  1001  1002  1030     38.16   141.85   103.69    275.04   277.21    289.79
 4  1001  1002  1001     38.16   145.18   107.02      0.00     0.00      0.00
 5  1001  1002  1019     38.16   138.51   100.35    382.22   393.30    402.72
 6  1055  1047  1044    -36.94   215.80   252.74    128.25   125.39    138.51
 7  1025  1019  1002    -34.63     5.32    39.96   1176.03   845.46    843.55 +
 8  1055  1047  1049    -33.67   215.80   249.46      0.45     0.52      0.48
 9  1060  1011  1004     33.64   106.52    72.89    174.30   182.45    180.56
10  1055  1047  1043    -32.29   215.80   248.09      2.80     3.25      3.03
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 14764455.39
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 14757105.82
               DIFFERENCE              =     7349.58
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0498 %
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  85
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER  19
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  69.76% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    57.23    69.76    81.20    91.57    95.30   100.00   100.00
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                0.15
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =          2.15 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =      0.80 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =       1.58 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =           37.54 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =    2.43 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:      6.47 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =  325
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     83.33 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    81.03    83.33    84.87    86.92    90.77    96.92    99.23
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =       1.239 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
    9180581.605    9185599.742       5018.137     0.00055
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     35734.38  34535.64   1198.73      3.47
  SECONDARY STOPS   41612.96  40415.48   1197.48      2.96
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    384.61    372.46     12.15      3.26
  QUEUING DELAYS      610.46    604.49      5.97      0.99
  CRUISE TIMES       1411.43   1411.77     -0.34     -0.02
  TOTAL TIME         2406.50   2388.72     17.78      0.74
  PCU-DISTANCE      43409.05  43418.59     -9.54     -0.02
  SPEED                18.04     18.18     -0.14     -0.76
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1019  1002      1.0000      0.7218 *     0.2782        28.0      26.0
  1011  1003      0.5359 *    0.5601 *     0.0242        32.9      32.9
  1026  1018      0.8649 *    0.8701 *     0.0051        47.7      47.7
  1011  1004      0.9961 *    1.0000       0.0039        19.5      19.5
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =   5
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.7830
     R-SQUARED (Y = X) =     0.7433
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      2.192 SECONDS -  19 LOOPS  GAP =   1.23880%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        372.5         40.7        413.1   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        372.5         40.7        413.1
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =        604.5        156.3        760.8   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        604.5        156.3        760.8
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       1411.8         89.5       1501.2   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       1411.8         89.5       1501.2
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =       2388.7        286.5       2675.2   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2388.7        286.5       2675.2
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      43418.6       2828.7      46247.3   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      43418.6       2828.7      46247.3
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =         18.2          9.9         17.3   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =         18.2          9.9         17.3
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  86
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP   20               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP   20
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =    0.715147
 BEST GAP VALUE     =    0.895184
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =    0.895184
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  87
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   0.4991              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    1.089 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
    0.098              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               84.76     1000.205      987.867      1.25       807.27                              794.93       794.93      1.53
  2     1.662      1.43     1000.042      993.503      0.66       807.17         0.103     0.0127     800.63       800.63      0.81      0.83   2
  3     2.316      2.04     1000.869      994.007      0.69       807.09         0.076     0.0094     800.23       800.63      0.80      1.16   3
  4     1.793      1.61      998.327      992.520      0.59       807.03         0.062     0.0076     801.23       801.23      0.72      0.95   4
  5     2.429      2.24      998.767      992.241      0.66       806.96         0.071     0.0087     800.43       801.23      0.71      1.21   5
  6     1.729      1.62      999.629      993.905      0.58       806.90         0.056     0.0070     801.18       801.23      0.70      0.98   6
  7     1.842      1.76      999.408      994.024      0.54       806.85         0.053     0.0065     801.47       801.47      0.67      0.93   7
  8     1.598      1.55      999.677      994.647      0.51       806.81         0.043     0.0053     801.78       801.78      0.62      0.80   8
  9     1.919      1.90      998.699      993.740      0.499      806.76         0.048     0.0060     801.80       801.80      0.61      0.96   9
 10     1.089      1.09      999.236                              806.73         0.03      0.0034                                              10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     0.1230 B =    -0.2776 R-SQUARED =      92.52 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     0.5970%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 14757105.82
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 14747117.15
               DIFFERENCE              =     9988.67
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0677 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP  20)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
 C  20 (1003) 1011      105.77    123.20     16.48      1.63
  1019  1020  1017       84.54     71.66    -15.24      1.46
  1030  1002  1001       71.42     61.57    -13.79      1.21
  1002  1001  1026       71.30     61.47    -13.78      1.21
 C  20 (1004) 1011      238.09    220.68     -7.31      1.15
  1020  1017  1056      234.35    218.74     -6.66      1.04
  1019  1025  1017      544.03    568.01      4.41      1.02
  1020  1019  1002      211.17    196.89     -6.77      1.00
  1017  1020            216.33    202.61     -6.34      0.95
  1020  1017            348.40    331.21     -4.93      0.93
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    0 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  1 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
    4 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  88
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER   20      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     0.691    56     0     0.00      4    11.06    0      4     11.06  0.003
  2     0.175    47     1     0.25      0     0.00    2      3      0.25  0.001
  3     0.105    47     0     0.00      0     0.00    3      3      0.00  0.000
  4     0.062    47     0     0.00      0     0.00    3      3      0.00  0.000
  5     0.028    46     0     0.00      0     0.00    3      3      0.00  0.000
  6     0.011    42     0     0.00      0     0.00    3      3      0.00  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    8 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    1 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    7 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION   7 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.01418 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1035 -       0.00
 OUT PROFILES -   1029 -       0.36
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP  20)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1020  1021  1029    -53.57   170.57   224.14    228.98   225.47    239.59
 2  1002  1019  1020     49.47   117.91    68.44    301.14   314.00    312.56
 3  1025  1026  1001    -45.50   101.21   146.71    184.78   185.60    189.58
 4  1025  1026  1018    -37.68   101.21   138.88    292.54   291.90    300.13*+
 5  1001  1002  1030     33.75   141.84   108.10    268.82   275.04    283.13
 6  1001  1002  1001     33.75   145.18   111.43      0.00     0.00      0.00
 7  1001  1002  1019     33.75   138.51   104.77    378.35   382.22    398.50
 8  1056  1018  1043    -28.65   356.37   385.02    243.86   241.64    280.39
 9  1020  1021  1003    -26.57   170.57   197.15    158.52   162.03    165.86
10  1018  1056  1055     21.44    85.15    63.71     60.48    60.26     61.95
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 14739420.29
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 14732900.16
               DIFFERENCE              =     6520.13
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0442 %
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  89
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER  20
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  67.83% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    52.05    67.83    80.96    92.41    95.54    99.76    99.76
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                0.15
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =          2.33 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =      0.87 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =       1.66 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =           37.20 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =    2.30 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:      6.19 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =  317
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     81.28 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    80.00    81.28    82.31    88.46    93.59    97.69   100.00
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =       0.862 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
    9157342.886    9162896.074       5553.188     0.00061
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     34535.64  34193.79    341.86      1.00
  SECONDARY STOPS   40415.48  40131.95    283.54      0.71
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    372.46    370.75      1.71      0.46
  QUEUING DELAYS      604.49    602.69      1.80      0.30
  CRUISE TIMES       1411.77   1412.15     -0.38     -0.03
  TOTAL TIME         2388.72   2385.59      3.13      0.13
  PCU-DISTANCE      43418.59  43433.01    -14.42     -0.03
  SPEED                18.18     18.21     -0.03     -0.16
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1011  1003      0.5278 *    0.5359 *     0.0081        32.9      32.9
  1011  1004      1.0000      0.9961 *     0.0039        19.5      17.5
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =   4
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.9998
     R-SQUARED (Y = X) =     0.9997
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      2.249 SECONDS -  20 LOOPS  GAP =   0.86229%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        370.8         40.1        410.9   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        370.8         40.1        410.9
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =        602.7        157.3        760.0   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        602.7        157.3        760.0
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       1412.2         88.9       1501.0   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       1412.2         88.9       1501.0
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =       2385.6        286.3       2671.9   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2385.6        286.3       2671.9
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      43433.0       2806.2      46239.2   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      43433.0       2806.2      46239.2
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =         18.2          9.8         17.3   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =         18.2          9.8         17.3
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  90
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP   21               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP   21
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =    0.597034
 BEST GAP VALUE     =    0.862292
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =    0.862292
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  91
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   0.4366              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    1.958 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
    0.072              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               86.42      998.218      989.566      0.87       806.34                              797.69       797.69      1.07
  2     1.310      1.15      998.490      992.795      0.57       806.28         0.057     0.0070     800.59       800.59      0.71      0.65   2
  3     1.685      1.50      997.798      992.630      0.52       806.23         0.048     0.0060     801.07       801.07      0.64      0.84   3
  4     1.920      1.74      998.529      991.748      0.68       806.18         0.050     0.0062     799.40       801.07      0.63      0.96   4
  5     1.366      1.26      999.357      994.610      0.477      806.14         0.046     0.0057     801.39       801.39      0.59      0.90   5
  6     2.175      2.05      998.070      992.709      0.54       806.09         0.052     0.0064     800.72       801.39      0.58      1.09   6
  7     1.575      1.51      998.186      992.712      0.55       806.04         0.042     0.0052     800.57       801.39      0.58      0.90   7
  8     1.612      1.57      999.472      994.544      0.496      806.00         0.044     0.0055     801.07       801.39      0.57      0.95   8
  9     0.870      0.85      998.748      994.407      0.437      805.98         0.021     0.0027     801.64       801.64      0.54      0.46   9
 10     1.958      1.96      998.680                              805.93         0.04      0.0053                                              10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =    -0.3116 B =    -0.1287 R-SQUARED =      73.64 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     0.5314%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 14732900.16
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 14725737.72
               DIFFERENCE              =     7162.44
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0486 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP  21)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
  1025 (1017)C  22        3.66      9.51    159.66      2.28
  1007  1061  1005        3.10      6.27    102.23      1.46
 C  11 (1020) 1017       92.42     79.87    -13.58      1.35
  1019  1020  1017       71.66     61.93    -13.58      1.19
  1026 (1001)C  23       49.39     57.70     16.83      1.14
  1030  1002  1001       61.57     53.21    -13.58      1.10
  1002  1001  1026       61.47     53.12    -13.58      1.10
  1007  1061              5.72      8.54     49.21      1.05
  1008  1007  1061        5.72      8.54     49.21      1.05
 C  11 (1056) 1017      166.08    178.95      7.75      0.98
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    0 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  1 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
    3 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  92
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER   21      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     0.583    56     2     5.56      1     2.30    0      3      7.86  0.005
  2     0.094    47     0     0.00      1     0.19    2      3      0.19  0.000
  3     0.052    47     0     0.00      0     0.00    3      3      0.00  0.000
  4     0.036    47     0     0.00      0     0.00    3      3      0.00  0.000
  5     0.013    46     0     0.00      0     0.00    3      3      0.00  0.000
  6     0.005    39     0     0.00      0     0.00    3      3      0.00  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    8 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    1 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    7 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION   7 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.01102 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1035 -       0.00
 OUT PROFILES -   1029 -       0.31
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP  21)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1002  1019  1020     49.49   146.45    96.95    291.48   301.14    306.92
 2  1001  1026  1018    -36.95   216.23   253.18    554.48   545.78    605.96*+
 3  1060  1011  1004     28.58    89.44    60.86    163.90   168.48    168.19
 4  1055  1047  1048     25.73   233.48   207.76    252.22   258.06    274.74
 5  1060  1011  1003     20.11    89.44    69.33    351.58   355.59    360.80*+
 6  1018  1056  1017    -18.98    82.18   101.15    616.31   606.81    629.34
 7  1018  1056  1055    -18.98    78.84    97.82     58.85    60.48     60.10
 8  1020  1021  1029     18.86   208.15   189.29    228.03   228.98    243.36
 9  1026  1018  1056     17.81   321.85   304.05     83.05    84.50     94.44
10  1028  1029  1021     17.07   223.58   206.51      2.67     3.11      2.83
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 14739542.32
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 14733967.58
               DIFFERENCE              =     5574.74
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0378 %
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  93
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER  21
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  71.93% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    59.40    71.93    83.98    93.49    95.42    99.52    99.76
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                0.12
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =          1.73 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =      0.64 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =       1.16 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =           37.37 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =    1.43 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:      3.82 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =  333
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     85.38 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    84.36    85.38    89.23    91.03    95.90    98.72   100.00
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =       0.890 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
    9161756.752    9163985.048       2228.295     0.00024
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     34193.79  33774.62    419.17      1.24
  SECONDARY STOPS   40131.95  40984.10   -852.16     -2.08
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    370.75    370.86     -0.11     -0.03
  QUEUING DELAYS      602.69    605.54     -2.85     -0.47
  CRUISE TIMES       1412.15   1410.40      1.75      0.12
  TOTAL TIME         2385.59   2386.80     -1.21     -0.05
  PCU-DISTANCE      43433.01  43381.57     51.44      0.12
  SPEED                18.21     18.18      0.03      0.17
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1011  1003      0.5187 *    0.5278 *     0.0091        32.9      32.9
  1026  1018      0.8711 *    0.8647 *     0.0064        47.7      47.6
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =   3
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.9994
     R-SQUARED (Y = X) =     0.9990
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      2.307 SECONDS -  21 LOOPS  GAP =   0.88970%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        370.9         40.3        411.2   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        370.9         40.3        411.2
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =        605.5        159.4        765.0   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        605.5        159.4        765.0
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       1410.4         89.7       1500.1   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       1410.4         89.7       1500.1
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =       2386.8        289.5       2676.3   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2386.8        289.5       2676.3
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      43381.6       2829.9      46211.5   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      43381.6       2829.9      46211.5
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =         18.2          9.8         17.3   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =         18.2          9.8         17.3
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  94
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP   22               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP   22
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =    0.531445
 BEST GAP VALUE     =    0.862292
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =    0.862292
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  95
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   0.3900              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    2.200 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
    0.058              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               84.84      998.581      989.689      0.90       805.89                              796.99       796.99      1.10
  2     1.493      1.29      998.505      992.927      0.56       805.82         0.066     0.0082     800.24       800.24      0.69      0.75   2
  3     1.660      1.45      998.516      993.594      0.495      805.77         0.046     0.0057     800.85       800.85      0.61      0.83   3
  4     1.563      1.39      997.754      993.031      0.476      805.74         0.038     0.0048     801.01       801.01      0.59      0.78   4
  5     1.158      1.04      997.894      993.516      0.441      805.71         0.027     0.0034     801.33       801.33      0.54      0.58   5
  6     2.088      1.92      998.583      993.858      0.475      805.66         0.046     0.0057     800.94       801.33      0.54      1.04   6
  7     1.536      1.43      997.812      993.655      0.418      805.63         0.036     0.0045     801.47       801.47      0.52      0.84   7
  8     3.079      2.97      998.429      992.474      0.60       805.56         0.064     0.0079     799.61       801.47      0.51      1.54   8
  9     1.502      1.47      997.853      993.976      0.390      805.52         0.045     0.0056     801.64       801.64      0.481     1.09   9
 10     2.200      2.20      998.137                              805.47         0.04      0.0053                                              10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =    -0.2751 B =    -0.2001 R-SQUARED =      91.35 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     0.4712%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 14733967.58
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 14726339.77
               DIFFERENCE              =     7627.80
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0518 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP  22)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
  1019  1020  1017       61.93     52.54    -15.16      1.24
  1060  1009  1030      515.11    491.67     -4.55      1.04
 C  34 (1062) 1004       99.38     89.25    -10.19      1.04
  1011 (1003)C  20      163.22    150.86     -7.57      0.99
  1026 (1001)C  23       57.70     51.06    -11.51      0.90
  1008  1022  1031      358.72    375.60      4.71      0.88
 C  11 (1020) 1017       79.87     87.67      9.78      0.85
  1010 (1063)C  25       40.80     35.64    -12.64      0.83
  1002  1019  1020      333.34    318.34     -4.50      0.83
 C  26 (1062) 1004       73.76     66.89     -9.31      0.82
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    0 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  1 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
    3 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  96
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER   22      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     0.547    56     2     5.78      2     2.16    0      4      7.94  0.067
  2     0.159    47     1     0.58      0     0.00    4      5      0.58  0.001
  3     0.071    47     0     0.00      0     0.00    5      5      0.00  0.000
  4     0.042    47     0     0.00      0     0.00    5      5      0.00  0.000
  5     0.009    42     0     0.00      0     0.00    5      5      0.00  0.000
  6     0.005    41     0     0.00      0     0.00    5      5      0.00  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    8 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    1 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    7 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION   7 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.01117 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1035 -       0.01
 OUT PROFILES -   1029 -       0.26
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP  22)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1025  1019  1020     50.31    56.34     6.02    134.64   430.34    135.84
 2  1025  1019  1002     50.07    56.34     6.26    869.68  1166.86    877.49*
 3  1032  1031  1022     30.56   346.15   315.59    325.26   330.02    381.77*+
 4  1055  1047  1048     29.71   236.95   207.24    247.69   252.22    270.20
 5  1001  1026  1025     25.88   274.93   249.05     87.98    88.66     97.79
 6  1001  1002  1019    -24.82    67.07    91.90    386.47   382.09    391.81
 7  1001  1002  1001    -24.82    73.74    98.56      0.00     0.00      0.00
 8  1001  1002  1030    -24.82    70.41    95.23    267.55   261.03    271.25
 9  1002  1019  1025    -22.00   104.11   126.12    704.52   693.10    729.44
10  1056  1018  1026     16.08   357.87   341.78    147.68   148.70    169.92
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 14761712.89
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 14757289.12
               DIFFERENCE              =     4423.77
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0300 %
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  97
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER  22
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  70.48% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    57.59    70.48    83.73    93.73    96.27   100.00   100.00
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                0.13
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =          2.14 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =      0.80 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =       1.60 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =           37.44 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =    1.75 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:      4.69 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =  318
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     81.54 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    81.28    81.54    85.90    90.00    95.38    97.69    99.49
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =       0.825 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
    9187710.345    9189502.065       1791.719     0.00020
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     33774.62  35475.13  -1700.51     -4.79
  SECONDARY STOPS   40984.10  39917.89   1066.21      2.67
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    370.86    384.92    -14.06     -3.65
  QUEUING DELAYS      605.54    601.99      3.55      0.59
  CRUISE TIMES       1410.40   1410.74     -0.34     -0.02
  TOTAL TIME         2386.80   2397.65    -10.86     -0.45
  PCU-DISTANCE      43381.57  43389.99     -8.43     -0.02
  SPEED                18.18     18.10      0.08      0.44
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1019  1002      0.7463 *    1.0000       0.2537        28.0      28.0
  1011  1003      0.5100 *    0.5187 *     0.0087        32.9      32.9
  1031  1022      0.3955 *    0.3998 *     0.0043        46.3      46.3
  1026  1018      0.8743 *    0.8711 *     0.0032        47.7      47.7
  1011  1004      0.9979 *    1.0000       0.0021        19.5      19.5
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =   5
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.8410
     R-SQUARED (Y = X) =     0.7420
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      2.366 SECONDS -  22 LOOPS  GAP =   0.82538%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        384.9         40.5        425.5   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        384.9         40.5        425.5
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =        602.0        163.5        765.5   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        602.0        163.5        765.5
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       1410.7         88.7       1499.4   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       1410.7         88.7       1499.4
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =       2397.7        292.7       2690.4   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2397.7        292.7       2690.4
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      43390.0       2799.7      46189.7   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      43390.0       2799.7      46189.7
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =         18.1          9.6         17.2   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =         18.1          9.6         17.2
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  98
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP   23               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP   23
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =    0.471170
 BEST GAP VALUE     =    0.825384
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =    0.825384
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  99
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   0.3546              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    1.987 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
    0.092              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               86.10     1000.110      991.937      0.82       806.25                              798.07       798.07      1.01
  2     1.519      1.33      998.891      993.916      0.50       806.19         0.062     0.0077     801.21       801.21      0.62      0.76   2
  3     1.507      1.34      998.599      994.585      0.404      806.15         0.037     0.0046     802.13       802.13      0.498     0.75   3
  4     1.681      1.52      999.701      995.313      0.441      806.11         0.034     0.0042     801.73       802.13      0.494     0.85   4
  5     1.311      1.20      998.216      994.504      0.373      806.09         0.028     0.0035     802.37       802.37      0.460     0.72   5
  6     1.947      1.82      999.614      995.347      0.429      806.05         0.037     0.0046     801.78       802.37      0.456     0.99   6
  7     1.665      1.58      998.175      994.682      0.351      806.01         0.035     0.0044     802.52       802.52      0.433     0.95   7
  8     2.137      2.07      999.448      994.900      0.457      805.98         0.038     0.0047     801.43       802.52      0.429     1.08   8
  9     1.089      1.07      998.531      995.003      0.355      805.95         0.025     0.0031     802.42       802.52      0.426     0.71   9
 10     1.987      1.99      999.890                              805.92         0.04      0.0044                                              10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =    -0.5301 B =    -0.1504 R-SQUARED =      91.53 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     0.4190%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 14757289.12
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 14751522.90
               DIFFERENCE              =     5766.22
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0391 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP  23)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
  1025 (1017)C  22       10.58     16.59     56.82      1.63
 C  11 (1020) 1017       87.67     77.09    -12.07      1.17
  1019  1020  1017       52.54     45.23    -13.90      1.04
  1019 (1002)C  16       91.73    101.96     11.15      1.04
  1012  1003  1012       44.51     38.32    -13.90      0.96
  1007  1061  1005        7.38     10.14     37.53      0.94
  1030  1002  1001       50.60     44.58    -11.89      0.87
  1002  1001  1026       50.53     44.52    -11.89      0.87
  1020  1017  1025      198.58    186.70     -5.98      0.86
  1019 (1020)C  16      158.43    148.46     -6.30      0.81
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    0 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  1 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
    5 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE 100
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER   23      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     0.564    56     1     2.31      4    11.89    0      5     14.20  0.004
  2     0.120    47     0     0.00      1     0.24    3      4      0.24  0.000
  3     0.074    47     0     0.00      0     0.00    4      4      0.00  0.000
  4     0.033    47     0     0.00      0     0.00    4      4      0.00  0.000
  5     0.012    47     0     0.00      0     0.00    4      4      0.00  0.000
  6     0.005    42     0     0.00      0     0.00    4      4      0.00  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    8 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    1 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    7 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION   7 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.00840 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1035 -       0.00
 OUT PROFILES -   1029 -       0.23
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP  23)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1002  1019  1025    -31.99    84.22   116.21    716.16   704.52    733.64
 2  1030  1003  1030    -25.88   194.28   220.16     23.71    24.80     25.54
 3  1030  1003  1011    -25.88   191.78   217.66     51.31    52.34     55.28
 4  1030  1003  1012    -25.88   189.28   215.16    212.89   208.27    229.36
 5  1030  1003  1021    -25.88   186.78   212.66    280.66   275.64    302.38
 6  1020  1021  1029     19.09   227.09   208.00    229.78   230.21    247.64
 7  1001  1026  1018    -18.95   235.10   254.05    563.87   558.57    620.31*+
 8  1055  1047  1048     18.56   230.77   212.21    244.14   247.69    265.42
 9  1020  1021  1003     18.22   227.09   208.87    157.72   157.29    169.99
10  1019  1002  1019     17.14   118.60   101.47      0.00     0.00      0.00
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 14715765.13
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 14711131.96
               DIFFERENCE              =     4633.17
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0315 %
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE 101
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER  23
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  77.83% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    63.61    77.83    87.83    94.58    96.14    99.40    99.88
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                0.11
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =          1.48 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =      0.55 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =       1.02 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =           37.05 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =    1.63 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:      4.41 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =  330
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     84.62 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    82.82    84.62    85.64    88.72    96.67    99.74   100.00
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =       0.875 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
    9143597.760    9146186.354       2588.594     0.00028
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     35475.13  35804.32   -329.20     -0.92
  SECONDARY STOPS   39917.89  39534.76    383.14      0.97
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    384.92    386.62     -1.70     -0.44
  QUEUING DELAYS      601.99    591.02     10.97      1.86
  CRUISE TIMES       1410.74   1411.59     -0.84     -0.06
  TOTAL TIME         2397.65   2389.23      8.43      0.35
  PCU-DISTANCE      43389.99  43417.09    -27.10     -0.06
  SPEED                18.10     18.17     -0.08     -0.41
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1026  1018      0.8820 *    0.8743 *     0.0078        47.7      47.6
  1019  1002      0.7405 *    0.7463 *     0.0057        28.0      28.0
  1011  1003      0.5054 *    0.5100 *     0.0046        32.9      32.9
  1031  1022      0.3976 *    0.3955 *     0.0021        46.3      46.3
  1011  1004      1.0000      0.9979 *     0.0021        19.5      17.4
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =   5
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.9996
     R-SQUARED (Y = X) =     0.9995
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      2.423 SECONDS -  23 LOOPS  GAP =   0.87498%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        386.6         40.0        426.6   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        386.6         40.0        426.6
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =        591.0        161.3        752.3   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        591.0        161.3        752.3
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       1411.6         87.3       1498.9   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       1411.6         87.3       1498.9
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =       2389.2        288.7       2677.9   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2389.2        288.7       2677.9
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      43417.1       2755.6      46172.7   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      43417.1       2755.6      46172.7
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =         18.2          9.5         17.2   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =         18.2          9.5         17.2
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE 102
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP   24               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP   24
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =    0.418985
 BEST GAP VALUE     =    0.825384
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =    0.825384
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE 103
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   0.3922              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    1.386 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
   -0.049              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               89.13      996.851      988.104      0.89       805.63                              796.88       796.88      1.09
  2     0.946      0.85      995.144      990.684      0.450      805.59         0.041     0.0051     801.13       801.13      0.55      0.47   2
  3     1.250      1.14      994.617      990.511      0.414      805.56         0.028     0.0034     801.45       801.45      0.51      0.62   3
  4     1.755      1.63      994.942      990.648      0.433      805.52         0.037     0.0045     801.23       801.45      0.51      0.89   4
  5     1.303      1.22      993.560      990.037      0.356      805.50         0.027     0.0034     801.97       801.97      0.437     0.68   5
  6     1.598      1.53      994.662      990.759      0.394      805.47         0.029     0.0035     801.57       801.97      0.434     0.81   6
  7     1.007      0.97      994.143      990.272      0.391      805.45         0.019     0.0024     801.58       801.97      0.431     0.56   7
  8     1.000      0.97      994.033      991.073      0.299      805.43         0.019     0.0024     802.47       802.47      0.368     0.56   8
  9     1.186      1.17      994.521      990.635      0.392      805.41         0.017     0.0022     801.53       802.47      0.365     0.60   9
 10     1.386      1.39      994.570                              805.38         0.03      0.0033                                              10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =    -0.2321 B =    -0.3481 R-SQUARED =      75.51 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     0.3522%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 14711131.96
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 14706343.78
               DIFFERENCE              =     4788.18
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0325 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP  24)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
 C  11 (1020) 1017       77.09     89.04     15.50      1.31
  1025 (1017)C  22       16.59     21.63     30.41      1.15
 C  11 (1056) 1017      180.69    168.44     -6.78      0.93
  1003  1030  1009      228.59    240.33      5.13      0.77
  1019  1020  1017       45.23     40.32    -10.87      0.75
  1020  1017  1025      186.70    196.53      5.26      0.71
 C  20 (1003) 1011      152.44    160.99      5.61      0.68
 C  16 (1025) 1019      113.59    106.57     -6.18      0.67
  1003  1030            321.95    333.97      3.73      0.66
  1019  1025  1017      590.10    606.31      2.75      0.66
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    0 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  1 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
    4 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE 104
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER   24      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     0.674    56     1     2.64      3     8.44    0      4     11.08  0.069
  2     0.151    47     0     0.00      1     0.21    2      3      0.21  0.001
  3     0.077    47     0     0.00      0     0.00    3      3      0.00  0.000
  4     0.047    47     0     0.00      0     0.00    3      3      0.00  0.000
  5     0.016    47     0     0.00      0     0.00    3      3      0.00  0.000
  6     0.006    41     0     0.00      0     0.00    3      3      0.00  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    8 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    1 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    7 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION   7 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.00866 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1035 -       0.00
 OUT PROFILES -   1029 -       0.20
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP  24)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1025  1019  1020    -38.02     5.68    43.70    434.02   126.70    123.57
 2  1025  1019  1002    -33.90     5.68    39.58   1176.43   868.87    865.98 +
 3  1002  1019  1025    -29.13    67.99    97.12    728.36   716.16    739.64
 4  1003  1021  1029    -21.39    87.60   109.00    500.58   499.63    508.59
 5  1003  1021  1020    -19.71    87.60   107.31    343.95   344.77    349.45
 6  1021  1003  1021     18.44   261.14   242.69      6.92     7.82      7.76
 7  1021  1003  1030     18.44   258.64   240.19     71.25    67.97     79.85
 8  1021  1003  1011     18.44   256.14   237.69    334.13   334.25    374.45
 9  1021  1003  1012     18.44   253.64   235.19    317.72   324.60    356.07
10  1011  1003  1011     18.14   158.18   140.05     32.48    34.40     34.60
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 14654574.93
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 14651764.80
               DIFFERENCE              =     2810.13
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0192 %
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE 105
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER  24
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  75.42% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    61.93    75.42    87.35    94.70    96.63    99.76   100.00
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                0.11
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =          1.62 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =      0.60 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =       1.11 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =           37.08 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =    1.87 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:      5.05 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =  326
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     83.59 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    83.08    83.59    84.87    90.77    94.36    98.21    99.49
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =       0.619 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
    9085081.687    9087040.733       1959.046     0.00022