exmouth/Exmouth_Network_x3Congestion.LPT

 
 
           The DVV / Atkins Ltd / ITS Leeds SATURN Suite 11.3.10E 26/01/2015
                     32-BIT FTN 95 VERSION  -  LEVEL N4
 
           PROGRAM      SATALL   SIMULATION/ASSIGNMENT 13.01.15
           RUNNING EXE: C:\SATWIN\XEXES - 11.3.10E\$SATALL.exe
           DATE OF EXE: 26/ 1/15
 
           MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIMULATION NODES =     23000
                             ASSIGNMENT NODES =     95000
                             ASSIGNMENT LINKS =    200000
                             ZONES            =      4000
 
           DATE 15/ 2/17           TIME 10:52:23
 
               THE MASTER FILE SAT10KEY.DAT READ FROM:
 
               C:\SATWIN\XEXES - 11.3.10E\SAT10KEY.DAT
 
           USER: AECOM (SATURN 10 TRAFFIC MODEL)
 
           BASIC DATA EITHER SET AS DEFAULT OR AS READ FROM SAT10KEY.DAT:
 
  (SET)    HPREF  = C:\SATWIN\HLP\
  (SET)    CPREF  = C:\SATWIN\DAT\
  (SET)    KPREF  = C:\SATWIN\DAT\
  (SET)    LEFTDR =     T
 (DEFAULT) GO4IT  =     F
 (DEFAULT) ADDAL  =     T
 (DEFAULT) LPERP  =    60
 (DEFAULT) LPERT  =    34
  (SET)    DRIVE  = C:
  (SET)    KPEXT  = TXT
 
 
     COMMAND LINE PARAMETERS:  Exemouth_Network_x3Congestion ExemouthRandMatrix
 
 
 THE ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABLE FTN95_NEW_MEMORY =    T
 IT IS USED TO MANAGE MEMORY ALLOCATION UNDER OBA AND SHOULD BE T
 IF OBA IS BEING USED.
 
 OPEN THE PREFERENCES/CONTROL FILE:
 
 CONTROL FILE
C:\SATWIN\DAT\SATALL0.DAT
 OPENED OK
 FULL PATH NAME:
C:\SATWIN\DAT\SATALL0.DAT
 
 
 THE INPUT SATURN UFN FILE IS READ FROM CHANNEL  1
 
 
 HEADER DATA FROM THE UNFORMATTED FILE READ FROM CHANNEL  1
 
      RUN NAME   Exemouth Test Network
      CREATED BY PROGRAM SATNET
      DATE AND TIME OF CREATION 15/ 2/17  10:52:23
      FILE NAME: Exemouth_Network_x3Congestion.UFN
      PATHNAME:  C:\Projects\ExeterCityFutures\GIS\ExemouthTestNetwork\Exemouth_Network_x3Congestion.UFN
      SATURN VERSION  11.3.10
 
 
 BASIC ASSIGNMENT NETWORK DIMENSIONS:
   39 ZONES     393 NODES     830 LINKS    1 USER CLASSES
 
 
 
 READING NAMELIST DATA FROM CHANNEL  5 - C:\SATWIN\DAT\SATALL0.DAT
 IDENTIFIER: PARAM
 
 
     NAMELIST DATA INPUT ENDS
 
              2 RECORDS READ IN TOTO
              0 WITH SYNTAX ERRORS
              0 VARIABLE NAMES IDENTIFIED
              0 WITH UNIDENTIFIED NAMES OR MISMATCHED DATA
              0 REPEATED INPUT NAMES
 
 
 
     LISTING OF THE IMPORTANT SATALL PARAMETERS USED
 
 ISTOP  =  100   KOB    =    0   KOMBI  =    0
 KONSTP =    5   KORN   =    0   LRTP   =   30
 MASL   =   30   MAXDTP =   10   MAXQCT =   60
 MODET  =    1   NISTOP =    4   NITA   =   10
 NITS   =   10   NFT    =  113   NOPD   =    0
 NOTUK  =    0   NITA_C =  256   NITA_F =    0
 NITA_M =    5   NITA_S =   50   NITS_M =    5
 MET    =    0   NIPS   =    2
 KLUNK  =    0   MASL_M =    0
 
 ALEX   = 5.75   CAPMIN =  30.   GONZO  =   3.000
 SUET   = 0.20   TAX    = 2.00   TDEL   =   3.00
 AFTERS = 0.50   WLMIN  = 300.   WLMAX  =   2000.
 APRESV = 1.00   AK_MIN =0.000   TIJMIN =     0.1000E-09
 RSTOP  =99.50
 
 SAVEIT =    T   SPIDER =    F   UFC109 =    T
 UFC111 =    T
 
 XFSTOP = 0.050   FISTOP = 0.050   UNCRTS = 0.050
 PCNEAR = 1.000   STPGAP =   1.000 STPCPU =  1000.0
 
          VALUES OF LOGICAL VARIABLES
 
 AMY       =    F   ASHORT    =    T   ATLAS     =    T   AUTOK     =    T
 AUTOX     =    T   AUTOZ     =    F   AUTONA    =    T   AUTNUC    =    T
 BB109     =    T   BEAKER    =    T   BUSKER    =    F   BYGRUP    =    F
 BYCAPI    =    F   CASINI    =    F   CLIMAX    =    F   COMPAS    =    F
 CROWCC    =    F   DIADEM    =    F   DIDDLE    =    T   DOUBLE    =    T
 DUALEX    =    T   DUTCH     =    F   ERTM      =    F   EXPERT    =    F
 EZBUS     =    F   FIFO      =    T   FOZZY     =    F   FREDDY    =    F
 FREEKY    =    F   FREEXY    =    T   FREE77    =    F   FUNNEL    =    T
 ICING     =    F   ILOVEU    =    T   KERMIT    =    F   KINKY     =    T
 KONAL     =    F   LCR108    =    T   LEFTDR    =    T   LIST      =    F
 MINDER    =    F   MONACO    =    T   MULTIC    =    F   M108      =    T
 NO333C    =    F   NOXYC     =    F   PARTAN    =    F   PASSQ     =    F
 PHILIP    =    F   PLOD      =    F   PRINT     =    F   PRSFD     =    F
 QUEEN     =    F   QUIKSA    =    F   Q105      =    T   RAGS      =    F
 RB106     =    T   REDMEN    =    F   REFFUB    =    F   ROSIE     =    F
 RTP108    =    T   SATOFF    =    F   SATTIT    =    T   SAVEIT    =    T
 SAVUFO    =    F   SECRET    =    F   SHANDY    =    T   SIGOPT    =    F
 SIM109    =    T   SIM111    =    F   SIM113    =    F   SOWHAT    =    F
 SPARSE    =    T   SPARTA    =    F   SPEEDS    =    T   SPIDER    =    F
 STUART    =    F   STOLL     =    F   SUZIE     =    F   SUZIEQ    =    T
 TDEL11    =    F   TFL       =    F   TOPUP     =    F   UNIQUE    =    F
 UPBUS     =    F   UFC109    =    T   UFC111    =    T   UPDATE    =    F
 UPFCF     =    F   USEUFO    =    F   WHATHO    =    F   WINDY     =    T
 WSTART    =    F   WRIGHT    =    F   XYUSER    =    F   ZILCH     =    F
 
          VALUES OF NON-DEFAULT LOGICAL VARIABLES
 
 ATLAS     =    T   FREEXY    =    T   SPEEDS    =    T   WINDY     =    T
 WRIGHT    =    F
 
          VALUES OF &PARAM INTEGER VARIABLES
 
 IBUSVC     =    1  IFCC       =    2  IFRL       =    1  INKS_S     =    0
 IROCKY     =    6  ISTOP      =  100  IEPSG      =27700  IXSHFT     =    0
 IYSHFT     =    0  IXYDEC     =   -1  KANGA      = 9999  KARL       =   50
 KDF        =    1  KLUNK      =    0  KNOBS      =    0  KOB        =    0
 KOMBI      =    0  KONSTP     =    5  KORN       =    0  KPHMIN     =   10
 KPHMAX     =  100  LCY        =   75  LRTP       =   30  LTP        =   60
 MANOFF     =    0  MASL       =   30  MASL_F     =    0  MASL_M     =    0
 MAXDTP     =   10  MAXLSF     = 3000  MAXQCT     =   60  MAXSPA     =   11
 MAXZN      =  500  MCALG      =    1  MCNUM      =    0  MCCS       =    1
 MCGILL     =    0  MCUBC      =    0  MET        =    0  MINLSF     =  300
 MINRED     =   10  MINSAT     =  500  MODET      =    1  MYTVV      =    5
 NFT        =  113  NIPS       =    2  NISTOP     =    4  NITA       =   10
 NITA_C     =  256  NITA_F     =    0  NITA_M     =    5  NITA_S     =   50
 NITS       =   10  NITS_M     =    5  NOMADS     =    1  NOPD       =    0
 NOPMAX     =    1  NOTUK      =    0  NUC        =   15  NUCMIN     =    1
 
          VALUES OF NON-DEFAULT INTEGER VARIABLES
 
 IROCKY     =    6  ISTOP      =  100  KPHMAX     =  100  LRTP       =   30
 LTP        =   60  MASL       =   30  NITA       =   10  NITA_M     =    5
 NITA_S     =   50  NITS       =   10  NUC        =   15
 
          VALUES OF REAL &PARAM VARIABLES
 
 AFTERS     =    0.5000 AK_MIN     =    0.0000 ALEX       =    5.7500
 APRESV     =    1.0000 BBKING     =    1.0000 BCRP       =    5.0000
 BETA       =    0.1000 BETA_2     =    0.1000 BETA_D     =    0.1000
 BETA_T     =    0.1000 BUSPCU     =    3.0000 BUSSPK     =    0.0000
 BTKNOB     =    0.0000 CAPMIN     =   30.0000 CLICKS     =    0.0000
 COBAF      =    1.0000 DEFCAP     = 1250.0000 DMWL       =  300.0000
 DMWL2      = 2000.0000 FISTOP     =    0.0500 FLAREF     =    2.0000
 FLAREX     =    2.0000 FRED       =    1.0000 GAP        =    2.0000
 GAPM       =    1.5000 GAPR       =    1.5000 GONZO      =    3.0000
 OBAMAX     =    0.1000 PCNEAR     =    1.0000 PMAX       =   10.0000
 POWER      =   -1.0000 PPK        =    6.2000 PPM        =   12.4600
 QDMAX      =  226.0000 QVCMIN     =    0.7500 RESIDD     =    0.0000
 RESIDR     =    0.0000 RSTOP      =   99.5000 STPCPU     = 1000.0000
 STPGAP     =    1.0000 SUET       =    0.2000 TAX        =    2.0000
 TDEL       =    3.0000 TIJMIN     =    0.0000 UNCRTS     =    0.0500
 VCPCU      =    1.0000 WLMIN      =  300.0000 WLMAX      = 2000.0000
 W32D       =    0.0010 W32T       =    0.1000 W32KPH     =    1.5000
 XFSTOP     =    0.0500 XYUNIT     =    1.0000 XYFACT     =    1.0000
 
          VALUES OF NON-DEFAULT REAL VARIABLES
 
 GAP        =    2.0000 GAPM       =    1.5000 GAPR       =    1.5000
 GONZO      =    3.0000 PPK        =    6.2000 PPM        =   12.4600
 RSTOP      =   99.5000
 
            EVALUATION OF GLOBAL PARAMETERS ETC.
 
 **** - WARNING - **** A LARGE VALUE OF PMAX, E.G., > 5, IS NOT RECOMMENDED;
        CURRENTLY PMAX =      10.00 - RE-SET PMAX TO 5.0?
        See Section 8.4.2 in the SATURN Manual.
 
 **** - WARNING - **** UPDATE NOT USED; NORMALLY THERE SHOULD BE
        A PREVIOUS NETWORK KICKING AROUND THAT IS WORTH AN UPDATE.
 
 **** - WARNING - **** WSTART NOT USED; HAVE YOU THOUGHT ABOUT
        TRYING IT? See Section 22 of the Manual.
 
 **** - WARNING - **** WE RECOMMEND YOU SET RAGS = T POST 10.9; See 8.6.2
 
 **** - WARNING - **** WE RECOMMEND YOU SET WRIGHT = T POST 10.7
 
 **** - WARNING - **** WE RECOMMEND SETTING A POSITIVE VALUE FOR AK_MIN;
        SAY, 0.20; See Section 9.3.2 in the SATURN Manual
 
INPUT TRIP MATRIX FILE (TIJFIL) = ExemouthRandMatrix.UFM
 
 
           LISTING OF THE OPTIONS CHOSEN UNDER &OPTION IN SATNET:
 
 UPDATE =  F   PASSQ  =  F   PLOD =  F
 WSTART =  F
 
 
 CLOSE CHANNEL  5 FILE C:\SATWIN\DAT\SATALL0.DAT
 
 
          DEFINE AND INPUT THE TRIP MATRIX:
 
 
A TRIP MATRIX HAS BEEN DEFINED BOTH AS:
ExemouthRandMatrix.UFM
ON THE COMMAND LINE AND AS FILTIJ:
ExemouthRandMatrix.UFM
ON THE INPUT .UFN FILE.
 
IDENTICAL FILE NAMES - NO FURTHER ACTION REQUIRED
 
 
OPEN THE TRIP MATRIX FILE ON CHANNEL 9:
ExemouthRandMatrix.UFM
 
 
 HEADER DATA FROM THE UNFORMATTED FILE READ FROM CHANNEL  9
 
      RUN NAME
      CREATED BY PROGRAM MX
      DATE AND TIME OF CREATION 10/ 2/17  15:29:26
      FILE NAME: ExemouthRandMatrix.UFM
      PATHNAME:  C:\Projects\ExeterCityFutures\GIS\ExemouthTestNetwork\ExemouthRandMatrix.UFM
      SATURN VERSION  11.3.10
 
 
      MATRIX TITLE - ExemouthTestMatrix
      MATRIX SIZE -     39 ROWS     39 COLUMNS
      TYPE OF ELEMENTS - REALS
      ELEMENT DIMENSIONS -
      ELEMENT UNITS -
 
      FILENAME: ExemouthRandMatrix.UFM
 
 
 N.B. ALL ELEMENTS IN THE TRIP MATRIX ARE FACTORED BY:   3.00
 (THE GONZO FACTOR!)
 
 
          READ AND PROCESS THE INPUT TRIP MATRIX
          WITH SPARSE = T; I.E., STORE ONLY Tij > 0
 
 
TRIP MATRIX MULTIPLICATION FACTOR FROM THE 888 .DAT FILE =  1.000
 
 
 PLENTY OF ROOM FOR TIJ IN INTERNAL MEMORY:
 WANTED         1410 +VE CELLS =   92.70% OF TOTAL CELLS      1521
 AVAILABLE  67275000
 
 
 PREVIOUSLY ALLOCATED SPACE FOR NETWORK ARRAYS =         3 KBytes
 COMMON BLOCK RAM SPACE USED BY TRIP MATRIX    =        15
 GRAND TOTAL OF RAM SPACE AVAILABLE            =    525589
 COMMON BLOCK RAM SPACE UNUSED                 =    525571
 
 AN ARRAY DIMENSION =  14950000 COULD BE REDUCED BY 100.00% TO        314
 
 IT APPEARS THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE DONE BETTER WITH SPARSE = F
 SINCE STORING ALL TiJ CELLS REQUIRES LESS RAM.
 
 
 SUM OF TRIPS (NON-INTRAS) TO BE ASSIGNED =    44268.00
 SUM OF INTRA-ZONAL TRIPS (NOT ASSIGNED) =         0.00
 
 
 CLOSE CHANNEL  9 FILE ExemouthRandMatrix.UFM
 
 
 CREATE A SCRATCH DIRCK ACCESS FILE ON CHANNEL 8 TO STORE COSTS BY ITERATION:
 $SATURN.$8
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE   2
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP    1               +++++
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 
                 FIRST ITERATION (I.E. INITIAL LOADING)
 
 
      RESULTS FROM THE FIRST ALL-OR-NOTHING LOAD
 
 SUM OF FLOWS*FIXED   TIMES (A) =    32007469.8 PCU-SEC/HR
 SUM OF FLOWS*ALTERED TIMES (B) =   580620198.0 PCU-SEC/HR
              (B-A)/B           =   94.49 %
 
 
      FIXED PRE-COSTS (A) DISAGGREGATED BY PURE TIME / OTHER COSTS:
 
 SUM OF FLOWS*FIXED PURE TIMES  (A1) =    16087327.2 PCU-SEC/HR
 SUM OF FLOWS*FIXED OTHER COSTS (A2) =    15920142.6 PCU-SEC/HR
 
 
 
 
                          ITERATION #    2
 
 LAMBDA (FRACTION OF ALL-OR-NOTHING FLOWS TAKEN) =  21.703 %
 
 
 
 
                          ITERATION #    3
 
 LAMBDA (FRACTION OF ALL-OR-NOTHING FLOWS TAKEN) =  15.857 %
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE   3
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
  11.2733              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
   12.732 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
    2.514              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
 PERCENTAGE INCREASE OF CONGESTED TRAVEL TIMES OVER FREE FLOW
 - EPSILON-2 - =  1029.63
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               14.27    13116.025     4378.380    199.56      6595.72                                0.00       723.04     89.04
  2    21.703      3.96    11678.425     5691.016    105.21      5602.96       992.76     17.72         0.00       723.04     87.10     16.90   2
  3    15.857      3.43    10888.943     6840.240     59.19      5135.15       467.81      9.11      1086.44      1086.44     78.84      9.59   3
  4    32.149     10.26     9439.676     6908.313     36.64      4498.06       637.09     14.16      1966.70      1966.70     56.28     15.74   4
  5    15.073      5.67     9267.629     7385.136     25.49      4301.32       196.74      4.57      2418.82      2418.82     43.77      7.77   5
  6    23.039     11.25     8714.909     7370.440     18.24      4081.34       219.98      5.39      2736.87      2736.87     32.94     11.69   6
  7    19.017     11.47     8645.327     7422.027     16.48      3951.63       129.71      3.28      2728.33      2736.87     30.74      9.65   7
  8    15.703     11.23     8483.187     7515.671     12.87      3854.59        97.04      2.52      2887.08      2887.08     25.10      7.99   8
  9    18.025     15.73     8275.157     7436.784     11.27      3767.13        87.47      2.32      2928.75      2928.75     22.25      9.04   9
 10    12.732     12.73     8167.694                             3713.19        53.94      1.45                                                10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     5.5458 B =    -1.1123 R-SQUARED =      97.81 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =    19.7939%
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE   4
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER    1      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
 
 N.B. NO BLOCKING BACK CALCULATIONS ON THE VERY FIRST SIMULATION
 
  1   473.731    56     0     0.00      0     0.00    0      0      0.00  0.000
  2    43.682    47    34  8819.21      0     0.00    0     34   8819.21  0.514
  3    11.857    49    30  2316.64     13   292.13    0     43   2608.77  0.187
  4     4.954    49    30  1183.60     10   176.45    4     44   1360.05  0.092
  5     3.242    50    26   483.14      9    71.11    9     44    554.24  0.039
  6     0.589    50    22   382.23      9    69.84   13     44    452.06  0.014
  7     0.254    50    16   293.41      4     6.83   24     44    300.24  0.005
  8     0.092    50    13   267.29      2     1.96   28     43    269.24  0.002
  9     0.047    50     8   259.74      1     0.37   34     43    260.11  0.001
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    3 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    3 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED    26 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION  10 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.02889 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1041 -       0.10
 OUT PROFILES -   1051 -       0.77
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP   1)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1027  1013  1004   3402.29  3543.90   141.62    175.47   775.00    833.39
 2  1027  1013  1014   3232.88  3543.90   311.03    194.52   790.00    923.87*
 3  1017  1025  1026   3180.88  3185.62     4.74    131.34   680.00    443.12*
 4  1017  1025  1019   3172.76  3185.62    12.86    152.20   650.00    513.47*
 5  1006  1005  1062   3126.58  3126.58     0.00    127.47  1700.00    402.46*
 6  1006  1005  1061   3126.58  3126.58     0.00     62.09  1550.00    196.03*
 7  1038  1036  1035   3047.95  3053.53     5.58    240.67   790.00    747.35*
 8  1038  1036  1037   3020.01  3022.01     2.00      0.00   775.00      0.00
 9  1022  1008  1032   2973.35  2973.35     0.00     29.25  1300.00     86.37
10  1031  1001  1026  -2893.26     7.22  2900.49    879.99   550.00    817.32
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE   5
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER   1
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =          479.67 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS = 1018.11 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:    212.25 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =   20
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):      5.13 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
     5.13     5.13     5.90     6.41     6.92     8.46    15.38
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =      64.551 %
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      0.480 SECONDS -   1 LOOPS  GAP =  64.55103%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        778.8       2078.8       2857.6   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        778.8       2078.8       2857.6
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =      15223.0      49507.0      64730.0   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =      15223.0      49507.0      64730.0
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       2151.8       3172.8       5324.5   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2151.8       3172.8       5324.5
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =      18153.6      54758.5      72912.1   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      18153.6      54758.5      72912.1
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      66120.2      97846.6     163966.8   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      66120.2      97846.6     163966.8
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =          3.6          1.8          2.2   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =          3.6          1.8          2.2
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE   6
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP    2               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP    2
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =   19.793903
 BEST GAP VALUE     =   64.551025
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =   32.275513
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE   7
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
  12.3569              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
   10.662 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
    1.194              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               20.00     4623.550     2736.312     68.97      2438.47                              551.23       551.23     77.39
  2    19.988      5.00     4282.234     2928.854     46.21      2238.06       200.41      8.95       884.68       884.68     60.47     10.62   2
  3    15.383      4.55     4216.532     3068.600     37.41      2133.63       104.43      4.89       985.70       985.70     53.80      7.72   3
  4    24.620      9.65     3968.500     3103.244     27.88      1990.52       143.11      7.19      1125.27      1125.27     43.47     12.47   4
  5    16.044      7.49     3799.290     3149.047     20.65      1922.77        67.75      3.52      1272.53      1272.53     33.82      7.83   5
  6    21.164     12.53     3713.079     3053.301     21.61      1852.58        70.19      3.79      1192.80      1272.53     31.31     10.79   6
  7    10.626      7.04     3661.034     3206.684     14.17      1817.15        35.43      1.95      1362.80      1362.80     25.00      6.11   7
  8    12.547      9.51     3562.723     3162.542     12.65      1788.59        28.56      1.60      1388.41      1388.41     22.37      6.29   8
  9    15.194     13.57     3520.692     3133.490     12.36      1758.05        30.54      1.74      1370.85      1388.41     21.03      7.63   9
 10    10.662     10.66     3485.539                             1737.42        20.63      1.19                                                10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     4.9585 B =    -0.8786 R-SQUARED =      96.59 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =    19.1668%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.19554E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.15576E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.39783E+08
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =     20.3453 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP   2)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
  1001  1002  1030      310.10   2355.00    659.42     56.02
  1001  1002            756.28   3177.86    320.19     54.60
  1002  1030           1622.06   4440.07    173.73     51.19
  1031  1001  1002      513.38   2074.56    304.10     43.40
  1002  1030  1009     1053.11   2886.37    174.08     41.31
  1029  1055  1056      353.68   1587.32    348.80     39.60
  1006  1005  1062     1366.57    273.36    -80.00     38.18
  1005  1062           1366.57    273.36    -80.00     38.18
  1055  1056  1017      228.74   1270.06    455.24     38.04
  1022  1008           2951.17   1250.27    -57.63     37.11
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    8 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  2 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
   34 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE   8
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER    2      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1    42.472    56    25  1944.10     26  1151.43    0     51   3095.53  0.216
  2     6.937    49    27  1002.96     19   643.79    2     48   1646.75  0.122
  3     2.082    49    28   557.80     17   403.05    6     51    960.85  0.054
  4     0.715    50    24   305.62     16   193.81    9     49    499.43  0.030
  5     0.590    50    16   267.16     14   233.30   18     48    500.46  0.040
  6     0.620    50    14   317.91     11   168.10   22     47    486.01  0.039
  7     1.510    50    16   341.62      9   217.77   22     47    559.38  0.062
  8     1.205    50    13   522.52      8   233.34   25     46    755.86  0.054
  9     0.843    50    10   386.18     12   266.29   25     47    652.47  0.032
 10     0.436    48    12   266.46     10   197.55   24     46    464.01  0.017
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    6 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    6 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   16 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED    10 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION  11 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.27595 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1010 -       4.07
 OUT PROFILES -   1005 -      16.68
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP   2)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1003  1011  1004   3270.13  3288.11    17.97    185.52   499.58    661.91*+
 2  1003  1011  1060   3122.99  3257.07   134.08    217.86   434.67    777.30*
 3  1022  1008  1032  -2218.70   658.97  2877.67     13.77    29.25     18.30
 4  1004  1062  1005  -2017.37     2.34  2019.71    297.92   193.58    155.97*+
 5  1004  1062  1061  -1984.76     4.09  1988.85    863.27   101.06    238.24 +
 6  1047  1043  1049   1820.74  2317.20   496.46     14.66   112.34     33.92
 7  1022  1008  1007  -1772.58   615.11  2387.69     50.70   107.68     67.37
 8  1019  1020  1017  -1688.05   393.63  2081.68     17.15    36.60     20.48
 9  1011  1060  1009   1519.66  1526.03     6.36     42.35   581.17     77.26
10  1038  1036  1037  -1376.97  1645.04  3022.01      0.00     0.00      0.00
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.18344E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.18104E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.24010E+07
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      1.3089 %
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE   9
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER   2
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  11.45% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    10.84    11.45    12.89    17.23    24.94    38.07    64.58
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                9.89
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =        268.19 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =     31.39 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =      48.21 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =          447.17 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =  284.59 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:     63.64 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =   61
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     15.64 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    15.38    15.64    15.90    19.74    23.59    31.79    51.03
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =      47.047 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
     161910181.     163666815.       1756634.     0.01085
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     83993.40  87892.03  -3898.63     -4.44
  SECONDARY STOPS  114202.88 165385.41 -51182.52    -30.95
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    778.81    856.21    -77.40     -9.04
  QUEUING DELAYS    15222.99  14429.00    794.00      5.50
  CRUISE TIMES       2151.77   2250.20    -98.43     -4.37
  TOTAL TIME        18153.56  17535.40    618.16      3.53
  PCU-DISTANCE      66120.23  68947.23  -2827.00     -4.10
  SPEED                 3.64      3.93     -0.29     -7.37
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1062  1061      1.0000      0.0780       0.9220         4.9       0.0
  1061  1062      0.1893      1.0000       0.8107         4.9      15.1
  1005  1062      1.0000      0.2044       0.7956         6.1       0.0
  1007  1061      0.2221      1.0000       0.7779        46.6      36.7
  1020  1019      0.2292      1.0000       0.7708       100.3     100.4
  1011  1060      0.2663      1.0000       0.7337        86.1      85.9
  1060  1010      0.2685      1.0000       0.7315        24.7      24.8
  1019  1020      1.0000      0.2801       0.7199       100.3      19.2
  1007  1006      1.0000      0.3394 *     0.6606       134.6      61.2d
  1019  1025      0.3601      1.0000       0.6399        84.0      84.0
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 d - QUEUE AT THE DOWNSTREAM HEAD OF A CHAIN OF LINKS
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =  56
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.0543
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      0.717 SECONDS -   2 LOOPS  GAP =  47.04690%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        856.2       1916.2       2772.4   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        856.2       1916.2       2772.4
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =      14429.0      44442.3      58871.2   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =      14429.0      44442.3      58871.2
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       2250.2       2925.0       5175.2   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2250.2       2925.0       5175.2
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =      17535.4      49283.5      66818.9   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      17535.4      49283.5      66818.9
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      68947.2      89675.6     158622.8   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      68947.2      89675.6     158622.8
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =          3.9          1.8          2.4   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =          3.9          1.8          2.4
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  10
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP    3               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP    3
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =   19.166769
 BEST GAP VALUE     =   47.046902
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =   23.523451
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  11
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   8.5809              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
   16.073 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
   -0.268              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               28.69     4245.729     2771.330     53.20      2069.59                              595.19       595.19     71.24
  2    11.627      3.77     4038.327     2964.186     36.24      1982.01        87.58      4.42       907.87       907.87     54.19      5.94   2
  3    16.772      6.54     3925.137     2990.922     31.24      1891.35        90.66      4.79       957.13       957.13     49.39      8.44   3
  4    14.679      6.71     3796.375     3099.047     22.50      1822.39        68.96      3.78      1125.06      1125.06     38.26      7.38   4
  5    13.248      6.98     3690.761     3114.036     18.52      1776.82        45.57      2.56      1200.09      1200.09     32.46      6.54   5
  6    15.671      9.79     3583.436     3085.354     16.14      1731.62        45.20      2.61      1233.54      1233.54     28.76      7.84   6
  7     7.731      5.24     3586.372     3205.718     11.87      1712.36        19.26      1.12      1331.71      1331.71     22.23      3.87   7
  8    12.433      9.62     3504.688     3138.980     11.65      1688.49        23.87      1.41      1322.79      1331.71     21.13      6.27   8
  9     7.836      6.58     3514.108     3236.395      8.58      1674.03        14.47      0.86      1396.31      1396.31     16.59      4.05   9
 10    16.073     16.07     3408.787                             1651.84        22.19      1.34                                                10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     5.3122 B =    -1.1182 R-SQUARED =      96.07 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =    14.7459%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.18104E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.15576E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.25278E+08
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =     13.9628 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP   3)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
  1003  1011           2979.51    975.28    -67.27     45.07
  1003  1030           1656.02   3918.63    136.63     42.86
  1003  1030  1009      480.36   1756.14    265.59     38.15
  1003  1011  1004     1713.01    491.50    -71.31     36.79
  1011  1060           2112.99    742.79    -64.85     36.26
  1003  1011  1060     2011.63    697.57    -65.32     35.70
  1011  1060  1010     1998.96    804.09    -59.77     31.92
  1062  1061            901.25   2109.93    134.11     31.15
  1019  1020  1017       63.34    553.17    773.32     27.90
  1021  1003  1011     1119.19    367.55    -67.16     27.57
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
   10 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  2 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
   35 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  12
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER    3      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1    30.620    56    25   808.99     24  1022.46    0     49   1831.45  0.136
  2     2.096    50    25   634.63     22   276.24    1     48    910.87  0.072
  3     1.701    50    19   383.34     17   187.40    9     45    570.74  0.030
  4     0.517    50    20   316.33     12   110.53   13     45    426.85  0.025
  5     0.406    50    17   294.22      9    59.75   18     44    353.97  0.006
  6     0.286    49    10   272.10      9    56.28   25     44    328.38  0.003
  7     0.236    49     4   268.21      5    45.80   35     44    314.01  0.002
  8     0.229    49     3   267.66      4    44.23   37     44    311.89  0.001
  9     0.227    49     2   267.57      3     8.27   38     43    275.84  0.000
 10     0.226    47     2   267.59      1     8.06   40     43    275.65  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    8 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    1 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    7 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   16 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED    18 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION  11 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.04525 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1033 -       1.48
 OUT PROFILES -   1033 -       2.91
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP   3)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1004  1062  1005   3101.54  3103.76     2.23     36.47   297.92    113.98*+
 2  1004  1062  1061   3051.10  3059.95     8.84    172.73   863.27    539.83*
 3  1003  1011  1004  -2484.06     4.22  2488.28    536.71   185.52    194.56*+
 4  1006  1005  1061   2112.20  2897.65   785.46     74.70   144.87    211.89*+
 5  1004  1011  1060   2048.17  3246.76  1198.58     48.95    55.64    168.55 +
 6  1004  1011  1003   1977.78  3246.76  1268.98    264.34   375.07    910.16*+
 7  1009  1063  1008   1939.16  2377.91   438.76    148.95   186.94    348.40
 8  1006  1005  1062   1708.57  2897.65  1189.09    195.11   141.15    553.43*
 9  1014  1012  1028   1673.55  2120.65   447.10    181.48   180.83    392.31
10  1009  1063  1010   1648.64  2377.91   729.28    139.19   170.41    325.57*+
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.17375E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.17511E+09
               DIFFERENCE              =-0.13644E+07
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =     -0.7852 %
 
 
 VI FUNCTION AT OLD AND LATEST FLOWS =      13.9628     -0.7852
 RECOMMENDED STEP LENGTH =       0.9468
 (LINEAR FIRST ESTIMATE INCLUDING A CORRECTION FACTOR OF   1.000)
 LOOP   3
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  13
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER    3      #####
           INTERNAL REPEAT  2  NITS_M =  2
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     2.960    56    23   366.64     29   610.51    2     54    977.15  0.009
  2     0.391    50    16   265.78     14   106.27   16     46    372.05  0.002
  3     0.247    50     7   259.60      8    12.33   29     44    271.93  0.001
  4     0.230    50     8   259.88      7     9.74   29     44    269.63  0.000
  5     0.220    50     5   259.00      2     9.09   37     44    268.09  0.000
  6     0.218    47     2   258.57      2     9.45   40     44    268.02  0.000
  7     0.217    47     2   258.61      2     9.59   40     44    268.20  0.000
  8     0.217    46     2   258.62      2     9.64   40     44    268.26  0.000
  9     0.216    45     2   258.62      2     9.65   40     44    268.27  0.000
 10     0.216    46     2   258.62      2     9.67   40     44    268.29  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    6 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    1 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    5 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   16 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED    18 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION  11 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.04560 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1033 -       1.41
 OUT PROFILES -   1033 -       2.95
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP   3 REPETITION  2)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1004  1062  1005   3059.71  3061.93     2.23     38.01    36.47    116.18*+
 2  1004  1062  1061   3009.59  3018.43     8.84    171.67   172.73    524.66*
 3  1003  1011  1004  -2483.32     4.96  2488.28    512.50   536.71    221.00*+
 4  1006  1005  1061   2067.28  2852.73   785.46     76.17    74.70    211.77*+
 5  1004  1011  1060   1961.21  3159.79  1198.58     50.22    48.95    163.70 +
 6  1004  1011  1003   1890.81  3159.79  1268.98    273.86   264.34    892.59*+
 7  1009  1063  1008   1825.37  2264.13   438.76    147.97   148.95    333.52
 8  1006  1005  1062   1663.65  2852.73  1189.09    192.15   195.11    534.21*
 9  1014  1012  1028   1586.75  2033.85   447.10    181.26   181.48    381.78
10  1009  1063  1010   1534.85  2264.13   729.28    138.87   139.19    313.03*+
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.17542E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.17609E+09
               DIFFERENCE              =-0.66653E+06
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =     -0.4013 %
 
 
 VI FUNCTION AT OLD AND LATEST FLOWS =      13.9628     -0.4013
 RECOMMENDED STEP LENGTH =       0.8754 AT REPEAT  2
 LOOP   3
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  14
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER    3      #####
           INTERNAL REPEAT  3  NITS_M =  1
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     3.859    56    25   424.32     28   543.24    1     54    967.56  0.013
  2     0.417    50    21   262.99     12   102.61   15     48    365.60  0.003
  3     0.240    50    10   253.10      8    44.37   29     47    297.47  0.001
  4     0.214    50     8   251.80      5    40.76   34     47    292.56  0.000
  5     0.207    50     8   252.26      7    40.77   32     47    293.03  0.000
  6     0.204    48     6   251.92      5    40.40   36     47    292.31  0.000
  7     0.203    47     4   251.49      3    39.87   40     47    291.36  0.000
  8     0.203    45     3   251.30      3    39.70   41     47    291.00  0.000
  9     0.203    46     3   251.28      3    39.64   41     47    290.92  0.000
 10     0.203    48     3   251.27      2    39.49   42     47    290.75  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    7 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    1 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    6 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   16 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED    18 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION  11 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.04641 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1033 -       1.32
 OUT PROFILES -   1033 -       3.00
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP   3 REPETITION  3)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1004  1062  1005   2965.23  2967.46     2.23     40.84    38.01    119.13*+
 2  1004  1062  1061   2915.59  2924.44     8.84    172.85   171.67    504.18*
 3  1003  1011  1004  -2481.86     6.42  2488.28    480.28   512.50    256.19*+
 4  1006  1005  1061   1970.26  2755.72   785.46     79.27    76.17    211.58*+
 5  1004  1011  1060   1829.53  3028.11  1198.58     51.86    50.22    157.27 +
 6  1004  1011  1003   1759.13  3028.11  1268.98    286.58   273.86    869.01*+
 7  1009  1063  1008   1664.28  2103.04   438.76    146.40   147.97    314.00
 8  1006  1005  1062   1566.63  2755.72  1189.09    190.50   192.15    508.48*
 9  1014  1012  1028   1462.08  1909.19   447.10    180.93   181.26    367.63
10  1009  1063  1010   1373.76  2103.04   729.28    138.27   138.87    296.55*+
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.17618E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.17544E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.73389E+06
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.4758 %
 
 
 AFTER  1 AUTOK AVERAGE STEPS FACTOR =   0.925
 INCLUDING THE LATEST LOOP RATIO OF   0.925 OF THE FINAL STEP
 LENGTH OF   0.875 TO THE FIRST ESTIMATED STEP LENGTH   0.947;
 See Section 9.3.2 in the SATURN Manual.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  15
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER   3
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  11.69% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    10.84    11.69    13.61    20.60    30.48    49.88    75.06
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                6.80
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =        185.07 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =     22.13 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =      36.07 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =          469.08 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =  193.45 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:     41.24 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =   75
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     19.23 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    18.72    19.23    21.28    24.10    30.26    45.13    63.85
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =      21.493 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
     156915326.     157050184.        134858.     0.00086
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     87892.03  89185.83  -1293.80     -1.45
  SECONDARY STOPS  165385.41 179269.33 -13883.92     -7.74
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    856.21    863.73     -7.53     -0.87
  QUEUING DELAYS    14429.00  14082.40    346.60      2.46
  CRUISE TIMES       2250.20   2286.89    -36.69     -1.60
  TOTAL TIME        17535.40  17233.02    302.38      1.75
  PCU-DISTANCE      68947.23  70037.62  -1090.38     -1.56
  SPEED                 3.93      4.06     -0.13     -3.25
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1062  1061      0.1311      1.0000       0.8689         4.9       4.9
  1044  1045      1.0000      0.2264 *     0.7736       125.6     108.2
  1011  1060      1.0000      0.2663       0.7337        86.1      73.4
  1007  1061      0.9414      0.2221       0.7193        46.6      15.4
  1005  1062      0.2821      1.0000       0.7179         6.1       6.1
  1044  1049      0.3819      1.0000       0.6181       131.5     131.5
  1034  1059      1.0000      0.4386       0.5614       108.2      57.9
  1020  1019      0.7805      0.2292       0.5514       100.3     100.4
  1050  1042      1.0000      0.5732 *     0.4268       121.0      56.0
  1010  1061      0.9432      0.5453       0.3979        19.8      19.9
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =  52
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.1991
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      1.344 SECONDS -   3 LOOPS  GAP =  21.49319%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        863.7       1849.6       2713.3   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        863.7       1849.6       2713.3
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =      14082.4      37595.2      51677.6   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =      14082.4      37595.2      51677.6
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       2286.9       2726.8       5013.7   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2286.9       2726.8       5013.7
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =      17233.0      42171.6      59404.7   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      17233.0      42171.6      59404.7
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      70037.6      83617.4     153655.0   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      70037.6      83617.4     153655.0
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =          4.1          2.0          2.6   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =          4.1          2.0          2.6
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  16
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP    4               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP    4
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =   14.745851
 BEST GAP VALUE     =   21.493189
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =   21.493189
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  17
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   6.5311              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    5.978 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
    0.584              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               37.36     3961.555     3263.187     21.40      1878.57                             1180.20      1180.20     37.18
  2    10.409      4.34     3873.605     3328.425     16.38      1842.41        36.16      1.96      1297.23      1297.23     29.59      5.18   2
  3    13.654      6.59     3836.553     3343.084     14.76      1804.76        37.65      2.09      1311.29      1311.29     27.34      6.91   3
  4    14.188      7.99     3768.871     3367.173     11.93      1770.76        34.01      1.92      1369.06      1369.06     22.69      6.89   4
  5     9.880      6.17     3723.816     3412.038      9.14      1750.49        20.26      1.16      1438.72      1438.72     17.81      5.04   5
  6     8.349      5.69     3719.879     3415.136      8.92      1737.47        13.03      0.75      1432.72      1438.72     17.19      4.18   6
  7    11.907      9.21     3654.001     3391.956      7.73      1719.37        18.10      1.05      1457.33      1457.33     15.24      6.06   7
  8     9.489      8.11     3640.103     3410.918      6.72      1706.88        12.49      0.73      1477.69      1477.69     13.43      4.77   8
  9     9.103      8.56     3618.964     3397.097      6.53      1696.43        10.45      0.62      1474.56      1477.69     12.89      4.56   9
 10     5.978      5.98     3616.638                             1689.79         6.64      0.39                                                10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     3.8834 B =    -0.6042 R-SQUARED =      95.12 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =    12.0985%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.17544E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.16367E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.11771E+08
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      6.7092 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP   4)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
  1009  1063           1857.12    824.97    -55.58     28.19
  1030  1009  1063     1691.62    758.15    -55.18     26.67
  1017  1020            644.79   1487.31    130.67     25.80
  1009  1063  1008     1035.66    386.94    -62.64     24.32
  1028  1059           1489.72    724.12    -51.39     23.01
  1017  1020  1019      347.10    880.97    153.81     21.54
  1012  1028  1059      645.16    242.08    -62.48     19.14
  1056  1017  1020     1089.54   1807.03     65.85     18.85
 C  20 (1004) 1011      621.42    232.17    -62.64     18.84
  1009  1063  1010      978.11    496.56    -49.23     17.73
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    5 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  2 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
   39 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  18
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER    4      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1    19.278    56    21  1015.63     26   573.91    0     47   1589.54  0.076
  2     3.273    50    22   676.48     20   155.21    3     45    831.70  0.035
  3     0.582    50    17   480.43     19   110.24   10     46    590.67  0.051
  4     1.288    50    17   549.88     11   110.89   16     44    660.77  0.053
  5     1.338    50    17   561.55     10   153.78   19     46    715.32  0.032
  6     0.272    49    15   419.97     12    86.86   19     46    506.83  0.022
  7     0.412    49    12   380.18     11   104.50   23     46    484.69  0.018
  8     0.448    49    13   406.91     10    80.46   23     46    487.37  0.011
  9     0.368    48    11   378.46     10    71.04   25     46    449.50  0.018
 10     0.519    48    14   422.43      9    75.16   23     46    497.59  0.022
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    9 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    9 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   16 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED     9 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION  11 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.51777 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1010 -       5.29
 OUT PROFILES -   1005 -      11.30
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP   4)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1006  1005  1062  -1823.05    47.93  1870.98    319.52   190.50    266.07*+
 2  1006  1005  1061  -1773.48    47.93  1821.41    143.25    79.27    136.42*+
 3  1004  1062  1005  -1751.87   943.49  2695.36     31.96    40.84     47.48*+
 4  1004  1062  1061  -1453.81   900.53  2354.34    298.60   172.85    443.50*+
 5  1004  1011  1060  -1357.64  1537.07  2894.71     27.84    51.86     50.55*
 6  1009  1063  1008  -1254.53    24.10  1278.62    215.85   146.40    113.61
 7  1032  1031  1022   1193.39  2047.82   854.44    338.96   494.15    720.79*+
 8  1012  1028  1029    921.99  1375.93   453.94    170.49   192.95    296.51*+
 9  1009  1063  1010   -857.25    11.05   868.30    215.34   138.27    145.80*+
10  1004  1011  1003   -847.72  1537.07  2384.80    312.48   286.58    567.33*+
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.16691E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.16410E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.28131E+07
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      1.6854 %
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  19
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER   4
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  13.98% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    11.93    13.98    17.95    26.99    44.58    66.14    85.30
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                4.02
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =        105.51 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =     12.76 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =      20.97 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =          442.87 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =  158.48 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:     35.78 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =   84
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     21.54 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    21.28    21.54    22.05    23.85    31.54    45.64    72.05
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =      15.959 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
     145904290.     148386077.       2481787.     0.01701
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     89185.83  89928.05   -742.23     -0.83
  SECONDARY STOPS  179269.33 166593.59  12675.73      7.61
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    863.73    865.17     -1.44     -0.17
  QUEUING DELAYS    14082.40  13747.56    334.84      2.44
  CRUISE TIMES       2286.89   2292.06     -5.17     -0.23
  TOTAL TIME        17233.02  16904.79    328.23      1.94
  PCU-DISTANCE      70037.62  70204.22   -166.60     -0.24
  SPEED                 4.06      4.15     -0.09     -2.14
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1008  1063      1.0000      0.2222       0.7778        13.9      10.8
  1007  1061      0.1988      0.9414       0.7426        46.6      20.2
  1007  1008      0.9724      0.2318       0.7406        25.9       2.0
  1044  1045      0.2928 *    1.0000       0.7072       125.6     125.6
  1044  1049      1.0000      0.3819       0.6181       131.5     124.2
  1005  1062      0.8163      0.2821       0.5343         6.1       6.1
  1008  1022      0.6069 *    1.0000       0.3931        17.7       5.0
  1028  1012      0.6794      1.0000       0.3206       281.4     281.4
  1020  1019      1.0000      0.7805       0.2195       100.3      65.0
  1011  1060      0.7932      1.0000       0.2068        86.1      83.6
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =  48
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.3136
     R-SQUARED (Y = X) =     0.0766
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      1.576 SECONDS -   4 LOOPS  GAP =  15.95934%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        865.2       1684.8       2549.9   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        865.2       1684.8       2549.9
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =      13747.6      33474.4      47221.9   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =      13747.6      33474.4      47221.9
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       2292.1       2631.6       4923.6   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2292.1       2631.6       4923.6
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =      16904.8      37790.7      54695.5   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      16904.8      37790.7      54695.5
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      70204.2      80703.1     150907.3   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      70204.2      80703.1     150907.3
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =          4.2          2.1          2.8   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =          4.2          2.1          2.8
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  20
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP    5               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP    5
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =   12.098473
 BEST GAP VALUE     =   15.959342
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =   15.959342
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  21
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   4.7979              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    4.625 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
    0.877              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               49.25     3708.233     3180.331     16.60      1705.62                             1177.71      1177.71     30.95
  2     7.112      3.77     3629.861     3253.591     11.56      1686.66        18.95      1.12      1310.39      1310.39     22.31      3.59   2
  3    11.292      6.75     3617.646     3272.492     10.55      1665.43        21.23      1.28      1320.27      1320.27     20.72      5.64   3
  4     7.403      4.78     3598.744     3328.298      8.13      1652.57        12.85      0.78      1382.13      1382.13     16.37      3.72   4
  5     8.639      6.10     3569.384     3332.814      7.10      1640.81        11.76      0.72      1404.24      1404.24     14.42      4.35   5
  6     7.967      6.12     3537.630     3334.869      6.08      1631.37         9.44      0.58      1428.61      1428.61     12.43      3.99   6
  7     6.572      5.40     3541.346     3360.002      5.40      1624.72         6.65      0.41      1443.37      1443.37     11.16      3.28   7
  8     6.631      5.84     3532.662     3371.100      4.79      1618.70         6.02      0.37      1457.13      1457.13      9.98      3.32   8
  9     7.723      7.37     3501.953     3341.625      4.80      1612.45         6.24      0.39      1452.12      1457.13      9.63      3.86   9
 10     4.625      4.62     3507.540                             1608.74         3.71      0.23                                                10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     3.7936 B =    -0.7067 R-SQUARED =      98.74 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     8.9412%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.16410E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.15767E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.64328E+07
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      3.9200 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP   5)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
  1061  1007  1008      394.99    944.04    139.00     21.22
  1005  1061  1007       47.12    320.55    580.30     20.17
  1007  1006  1005     1095.53   1871.04     70.79     20.14
  1061  1007            458.27    988.97    115.81     19.73
  1006  1005  1062      353.72    818.97    131.53     19.21
  1005  1062            353.72    818.97    131.53     19.21
  1009  1063  1008      386.94    864.80    123.50     19.10
  1009  1063            824.97   1464.74     77.55     18.91
 C   9 (1041) 1042       30.14    248.98    726.13     18.52
  1005  1006  1007     2109.50   1365.90    -35.25     17.84
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    5 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  2 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
   39 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  22
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER    5      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1    15.374    56    22   909.95     24   504.23    0     46   1414.18  0.060
  2     1.863    50    22   588.01     14    80.58    6     42    668.59  0.038
  3     0.515    50    19   385.72     10    25.81   14     43    411.53  0.018
  4     0.111    49    13   302.22     10    38.93   21     44    341.14  0.015
  5     0.100    50    13   330.84      7    23.14   24     44    353.98  0.010
  6     0.050    48    12   300.56      7    16.56   25     44    317.12  0.005
  7     0.017    46    11   291.78      8    13.57   25     44    305.36  0.004
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    7 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    7 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   16 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED    17 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION   8 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.20013 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1061 -       1.05
 OUT PROFILES -   1029 -       5.92
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP   5)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1009  1063  1010   1991.87  2173.47   181.60    151.48   215.34    332.10*+
 2  1009  1063  1008   1946.91  2173.47   226.56    163.56   215.85    358.58
 3  1011  1060  1010    905.66  1187.96   282.29    190.98   219.72    312.91*+
 4  1014  1012  1028    769.74  1560.12   790.38    110.83   140.03    203.77
 5  1006  1005  1061   -764.66   722.42  1487.08    207.38   143.25    284.88*+
 6  1004  1062  1061   -758.47   277.22  1035.69    394.26   298.60    448.71*+
 7  1050  1042  1044   -713.42    95.82   809.24     69.44    48.93     68.34
 8  1050  1042  1048   -687.24    96.02   783.26      3.07     4.35      2.88
 9  1005  1062  1061   -686.63    50.80   737.43    320.73   275.70    320.87*+
10  1061  1007  1006    679.10   682.67     3.56     13.14   937.00     17.86
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.16548E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.16461E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.86607E+06
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.5234 %
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  23
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER   5
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  15.42% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    13.49    15.42    20.00    36.02    52.17    69.52    88.92
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                3.33
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =         86.73 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =     10.64 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =      18.05 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =          460.15 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =  120.18 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:     26.12 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =   93
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     23.85 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    23.08    23.85    25.38    28.21    38.46    55.90    74.62
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =       9.786 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
     146653830.     147280405.        626574.     0.00427
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     89928.05  93752.59  -3824.53     -4.08
  SECONDARY STOPS  166593.59 164691.52   1902.08      1.15
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    865.17    888.12    -22.95     -2.58
  QUEUING DELAYS    13747.56  13751.73     -4.17     -0.03
  CRUISE TIMES       2292.06   2267.62     24.44      1.08
  TOTAL TIME        16904.79  16907.48     -2.69     -0.02
  PCU-DISTANCE      70204.22  69464.90    739.32      1.06
  SPEED                 4.15      4.11      0.04      1.08
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1007  1008      0.3431      0.9724       0.6294        25.9      25.9
  1008  1063      0.4905      1.0000       0.5095        13.9      14.4
  1010  1061      0.5352      0.9832       0.4480        19.8      21.4
  1062  1005      0.6755      0.3357       0.3397         6.1       6.0
  1028  1012      1.0000      0.6794       0.3206       281.4     246.6
  1061  1007      0.7664      1.0000       0.2336        46.6      54.6
  1011  1060      1.0000      0.7932       0.2068        86.1      74.9
  1010  1063      0.9338 *    0.7306 *     0.2032        26.8      26.5
  1025  1019      0.8802      0.6875       0.1927        84.0      84.0
  1007  1061      0.3820      0.1988       0.1832        46.6      45.8
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =  47
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.6348
     R-SQUARED (Y = X) =     0.5791
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      1.736 SECONDS -   5 LOOPS  GAP =   9.78623%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        888.1       1728.0       2616.1   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        888.1       1728.0       2616.1
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =      13751.7      34032.1      47783.8   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =      13751.7      34032.1      47783.8
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       2267.6       2588.5       4856.2   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2267.6       2588.5       4856.2
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =      16907.5      38348.6      55256.1   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      16907.5      38348.6      55256.1
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      69464.9      79456.3     148921.2   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      69464.9      79456.3     148921.2
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =          4.1          2.1          2.7   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =          4.1          2.1          2.7
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  24
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP    6               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP    6
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =    8.941246
 BEST GAP VALUE     =    9.786231
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =    9.786231
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  25
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   4.0000              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    5.584 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
    0.328              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               50.51     3723.993     3385.781      9.99      1717.33                             1379.12      1379.12     19.69
  2     7.434      4.06     3728.549     3443.952      8.26      1704.73        12.60      0.74      1420.13      1420.13     16.69      3.73   2
  3     6.892      4.04     3722.913     3486.792      6.77      1695.06         9.67      0.57      1458.94      1458.94     13.93      3.40   3
  4    11.383      7.53     3696.606     3434.597      7.63      1681.61        13.44      0.80      1419.61      1458.94     13.24      5.69   4
  5     4.966      3.46     3704.292     3524.932      5.09      1675.08         6.54      0.39      1495.72      1495.72     10.71      2.94   5
  6     9.922      7.67     3678.205     3489.241      5.42      1666.18         8.90      0.53      1477.21      1495.72     10.23      4.96   6
  7     4.488      3.63     3684.129     3527.479      4.44      1661.96         4.22      0.25      1505.31      1505.31      9.43      2.48   7
  8     7.997      7.03     3673.740     3521.077      4.34      1655.64         6.32      0.38      1502.98      1505.31      9.08      4.03   8
  9     6.881      6.50     3661.718     3520.883      4.00      1650.42         5.22      0.32      1509.59      1509.59      8.53      3.47   9
 10     5.584      5.58     3663.451                             1646.49         3.93      0.24                                                10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     3.0073 B =    -0.3893 R-SQUARED =      98.45 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     8.1903%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.16461E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.16030E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.43118E+07
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      2.6194 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP   6)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
  1009  1063           1464.74    739.89    -49.49     21.83
  1030  1009  1063     1198.82    605.56    -49.49     19.75
  1009  1063  1008      864.80    436.84    -49.49     16.78
  1009  1063  1010      800.92    404.57    -49.49     16.14
  1050 (1048)C  18        8.91    153.84   1626.84     16.07
  1050  1042  1048        4.66    107.12   2196.89     13.70
  1004  1062  1005      150.07    368.21    145.37     13.55
  1062  1005  1006       54.26    173.48    219.74     11.17
  1030  1009           3192.26   2592.76    -18.78     11.15
 C   6 (1041) 1045      175.59    357.39    103.53     11.14
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    2 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  2 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
   41 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  26
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER    6      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1    10.546    56    24   560.01     21   188.13    0     45    748.14  0.053
  2     1.268    50    25   458.73     17    89.22    4     46    547.95  0.021
  3     0.185    50    18   351.58      9    33.33   18     45    384.92  0.054
  4     0.498    50    14   564.34      7    37.25   22     43    601.59  0.030
  5     0.157    49    11   400.39     10   133.63   24     45    534.01  0.018
  6     0.148    48    15   356.19      6    54.72   24     45    410.91  0.015
  7     0.241    47    14   368.51      7    31.62   24     45    400.13  0.038
  8     0.685    45    13   457.90      8    74.46   24     45    532.36  0.038
  9     0.159    44    10   386.60     11    94.32   24     45    480.92  0.015
 10     0.180    44    11   387.87      8    44.35   25     44    432.22  0.008
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    8 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    8 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED    11 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION  11 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.18976 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1061 -       1.54
 OUT PROFILES -   1029 -       5.68
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP   6)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1009  1063  1008  -1371.95    68.59  1440.53    182.48   163.56    184.21*
 2  1006  1005  1062    935.42  1592.46   657.04    300.94   449.15    557.47*+
 3  1009  1063  1010   -916.22    68.59   984.80    169.00   151.48    170.60*+
 4  1009  1060  1011    876.01  1261.10   385.09    106.57   145.75    177.96*+
 5  1007  1061  1005   -646.05    21.06   667.11     40.94     0.42      0.27
 6  1041  1045  1046    643.95  1822.55  1178.60    208.87   218.39    410.29
 7  1004  1062  1005    637.51  1053.68   416.17     84.10    48.60    130.30*+
 8  1009  1060  1010    598.92  1261.10   662.18    422.55   457.47    705.60*+
 9  1027  1013  1014    597.58  3566.59  2969.01    166.90   165.72    811.76*+
10  1006  1005  1061    575.71  1592.46  1016.75    178.61   207.38    330.85*+
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.16355E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.16264E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.90787E+06
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.5551 %
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  27
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER   6
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  20.72% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    15.54    20.72    30.00    46.14    65.54    80.60    98.43
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                2.07
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =         49.87 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =      6.16 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =      10.52 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =          456.47 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =   87.07 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:     19.07 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =  110
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     28.21 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    27.18    28.21    30.00    38.97    51.79    64.87    82.56
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =       8.871 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
     144790166.     145595613.        805447.     0.00556
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     93752.59  90063.30   3689.28      4.10
  SECONDARY STOPS  164691.52 165612.36   -920.84     -0.56
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    888.12    883.43      4.69      0.53
  QUEUING DELAYS    13751.73  13786.69    -34.95     -0.25
  CRUISE TIMES       2267.62   2262.30      5.32      0.23
  TOTAL TIME        16907.48  16932.42    -24.94     -0.15
  PCU-DISTANCE      69464.90  69288.86    176.04      0.25
  SPEED                 4.11      4.09      0.02      0.40
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1007  1061      1.0000      0.3820       0.6180        46.6       1.2
  1061  1007      0.1968      0.7664       0.5696        46.6      38.5
  1008  1063      1.0000      0.4905       0.5095        13.9       0.0
  1010  1063      0.6366      0.9338 *     0.2971        26.8      25.0
  1005  1062      0.6741      0.9216       0.2475         6.1       5.1
  1061  1010      0.4790      0.2895       0.1895        19.8      26.5
  1063  1008      0.8174      1.0000       0.1826        13.9      14.3
  1008  1022      0.5115 *    0.6732 *     0.1617        17.7      18.7
  1062  1061      0.2627      0.3803       0.1176         4.9       0.0
  1007  1008      0.2324      0.3431       0.1106        25.9      25.7
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =  44
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.5561
     R-SQUARED (Y = X) =     0.4869
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      1.953 SECONDS -   6 LOOPS  GAP =   8.87141%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        883.4       1724.1       2607.5   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        883.4       1724.1       2607.5
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =      13786.7      33250.6      47037.3   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =      13786.7      33250.6      47037.3
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       2262.3       2568.4       4830.7   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2262.3       2568.4       4830.7
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =      16932.4      37543.0      54475.5   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      16932.4      37543.0      54475.5
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      69288.9      78782.8     148071.7   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      69288.9      78782.8     148071.7
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =          4.1          2.1          2.7   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =          4.1          2.1          2.7
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  28
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP    7               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP    7
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =    8.190341
 BEST GAP VALUE     =    8.871414
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =    8.871414
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  29
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   2.5625              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    6.348 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
   -0.047              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               56.35     3679.926     3369.107      9.23      1662.87                             1352.05      1352.05     18.69
  2     4.084      2.40     3655.478     3442.445      6.19      1656.42         6.45      0.39      1443.39      1443.39     12.86      2.07   2
  3     9.760      6.35     3644.484     3461.865      5.28      1646.03        10.39      0.63      1463.41      1463.41     11.09      4.88   3
  4     8.630      6.15     3625.359     3467.175      4.56      1638.17         7.85      0.48      1479.99      1479.99      9.66      4.30   4
  5     3.899      2.89     3623.146     3502.729      3.44      1635.08         3.09      0.189     1514.67      1514.67      7.36      1.95   5
  6     7.386      5.91     3605.158     3477.093      3.68      1630.64         4.45      0.27      1502.57      1514.67      7.11      3.69   6
  7     5.148      4.34     3600.492     3499.623      2.88      1627.33         3.30      0.20      1526.46      1526.46      6.20      2.85   7
  8     6.358      5.73     3586.329     3473.708      3.24      1624.16         3.17      0.195     1511.54      1526.46      6.02      3.15   8
  9     3.766      3.53     3588.025     3498.380      2.56      1622.04         2.12      0.131     1532.39      1532.39      5.53      2.17   9
 10     6.348      6.35     3581.988                             1619.19         2.85      0.176                                               10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     2.8257 B =    -0.5031 R-SQUARED =      95.43 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     5.2413%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.16264E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.15993E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.27194E+07
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      1.6720 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP   7)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
  1009  1063            739.89   1161.65     57.00     13.68
  1009  1060           1527.24   1058.10    -30.72     13.05
  1030  1009  1063      605.56    957.61     58.14     12.59
 C  39 (1008) 1063      163.81    360.15    119.86     12.13
  1007  1061            681.26   1014.26     48.88     11.44
  1006  1007            814.27   1154.81     41.82     10.85
  1060  1010           2042.68   1585.46    -22.38     10.74
  1006  1007  1061      236.36    432.00     82.77     10.70
  1009  1060  1010     1595.75   1202.28    -24.66     10.52
  1009  1063  1008      436.84    685.95     57.02     10.51
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    0 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  1 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
   42 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  30
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER    7      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     7.902    56    22   494.83     23   231.55    0     45    726.38  0.026
  2     0.593    50    20   427.26     19    61.65    6     45    488.90  0.017
  3     0.538    50    18   413.62      7    39.74   21     46    453.36  0.008
  4     0.047    49    17   388.20      7    35.06   22     46    423.26  0.010
  5     0.104    50    13   400.38      6    19.07   27     46    419.45  0.006
  6     0.049    47     9   382.36      9    13.80   27     45    396.16  0.004
  7     0.038    47    10   376.29      6     9.59   29     45    385.87  0.002
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    7 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    7 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   16 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED    15 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION   8 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.18869 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1061 -       0.21
 OUT PROFILES -   1029 -       5.82
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP   7)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1006  1007  1061   1076.95  1952.28   875.34    168.98   124.85    350.00*
 2  1006  1005  1062  -1025.37   262.94  1288.31    306.68   300.94    341.85 +
 3  1004  1062  1061   -919.75   110.84  1030.59    443.02   300.53    463.33*+
 4  1004  1062  1005   -868.98   137.42  1006.40     94.85    84.10     99.20*+
 5  1006  1007  1008    793.14  1983.65  1190.51    282.74   305.27    585.61*+
 6  1007  1061  1005    678.04   698.72    20.67      0.10    40.94      0.14
 7  1007  1061  1010    658.00   698.72    40.71     96.55   147.52    131.99*+
 8  1006  1005  1061   -634.40   262.94   897.34    200.04   178.61    222.98*+
 9  1027  1013  1014    609.77  3578.96  2969.19    164.04   166.90    816.48*+
10  1061  1007  1008    605.97   832.92   226.95    198.89   192.81    286.67*+
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.16250E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.16218E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.32012E+06
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.1970 %
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  31
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER   7
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  25.06% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    19.52    25.06    34.22    53.49    69.64    82.29    98.43
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                1.77
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =         42.28 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =      5.26 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =       9.18 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =          460.31 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =   84.55 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:     18.37 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =  130
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     33.33 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    31.54    33.33    35.64    45.64    53.33    69.23    87.44
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =       7.003 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
     144412015.     144642556.        230541.     0.00160
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     90063.30  91383.52  -1320.21     -1.44
  SECONDARY STOPS  165612.36 166901.80  -1289.44     -0.77
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    883.43    882.00      1.44      0.16
  QUEUING DELAYS    13786.69  13765.67     21.02      0.15
  CRUISE TIMES       2262.30   2251.13     11.17      0.50
  TOTAL TIME        16932.42  16898.79     33.63      0.20
  PCU-DISTANCE      69288.86  68945.52    343.34      0.50
  SPEED                 4.09      4.08      0.01      0.30
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1008  1063      0.5487      1.0000       0.4513        13.9      14.5
  1005  1062      1.0000      0.6741       0.3259         6.1       0.0
  1007  1061      0.7151      1.0000       0.2849        46.6      47.9
  1010  1061      0.3409      0.5616       0.2208        19.8      19.9
  1061  1007      0.3594      0.1968       0.1626        46.6      46.7
  1062  1061      0.4247      0.2627       0.1620         4.9       4.9
  1010  1060      0.4989      0.3464       0.1526        24.7      25.3
  1010  1063      0.7560      0.6366       0.1194        26.8      25.5
  1025  1019      0.9305      0.8166       0.1139        84.0      84.0
  1062  1005      0.4910      0.5723       0.0814         6.1       6.2
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =  44
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.7766
     R-SQUARED (Y = X) =     0.7517
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      2.109 SECONDS -   7 LOOPS  GAP =   7.00272%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        882.0       1722.0       2604.0   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        882.0       1722.0       2604.0
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =      13765.7      33397.6      47163.3   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =      13765.7      33397.6      47163.3
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       2251.1       2553.4       4804.6   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2251.1       2553.4       4804.6
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =      16898.8      37673.1      54571.9   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      16898.8      37673.1      54571.9
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      68945.5      78383.3     147328.8   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      68945.5      78383.3     147328.8
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =          4.1          2.1          2.7   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =          4.1          2.1          2.7
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  32
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP    8               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP    8
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =    5.241347
 BEST GAP VALUE     =    7.002724
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =    7.002724
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  33
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   2.5460              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    7.001 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
    0.378              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               59.82     3672.809     3416.025      7.52      1656.94                             1400.16      1400.16     15.50
  2     4.491      2.81     3668.960     3486.200      5.24      1651.17         5.77      0.35      1468.41      1468.41     11.07      2.25   2
  3     6.411      4.29     3678.666     3513.296      4.71      1645.23         5.94      0.36      1479.86      1479.86     10.05      3.25   3
  4     5.349      3.78     3675.677     3533.506      4.02      1640.79         4.44      0.27      1498.62      1498.62      8.66      2.68   4
  5     4.616      3.42     3678.188     3558.043      3.38      1637.51         3.28      0.20      1517.36      1517.36      7.34      2.31   5
  6     6.194      4.90     3673.021     3552.933      3.38      1633.78         3.73      0.23      1513.69      1517.36      7.13      3.10   6
  7     5.453      4.56     3661.914     3560.604      2.85      1630.51         3.27      0.20      1529.20      1529.20      6.21      2.81   7
  8     5.123      4.51     3663.864     3572.547      2.56      1627.91         2.60      0.160     1536.59      1536.59      5.61      2.57   8
  9     5.267      4.90     3650.050     3559.426      2.55      1625.51         2.40      0.148     1534.89      1536.59      5.47      2.63   9
 10     7.001      7.00     3646.027                             1622.34         3.17      0.196                                               10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     2.9225 B =    -0.5617 R-SQUARED =      94.51 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     5.1559%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.16218E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.16004E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.21345E+07
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      1.3161 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP   8)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
  1006  1005  1062      485.20    789.80     62.78     12.06
  1005  1062            485.20    789.80     62.78     12.06
  1006  1005            446.39    708.37     58.69     10.90
  1006  1007           1154.81    839.09    -27.34     10.00
  1012 (1014)C  37      114.40    245.17    114.32      9.75
  1028  1012  1014       92.19    206.50    124.00      9.35
  1006  1007  1061      432.00    258.44    -40.18      9.34
  1007  1061  1010      395.07    236.35    -40.18      8.93
  1005  1062  1004      365.88    555.77     51.90      8.85
 C   6 (1041) 1045      204.63    346.93     69.54      8.57
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    2 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  2 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
   41 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  34
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER    8      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     6.985    56    25   572.87     21   166.96    1     47    739.82  0.039
  2     0.674    50    21   395.19     17    87.39    8     46    482.58  0.017
  3     0.094    50    14   330.22      8    62.83   24     46    393.05  0.014
  4     0.098    49    12   322.36      6    44.77   28     46    367.13  0.004
  5     0.010    48    10   316.61      8    26.67   27     45    343.28  0.005
  6     0.012    45    13   313.31      6    23.15   26     45    336.46  0.003
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    8 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    1 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    7 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED    13 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION   7 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.20882 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1010 -       0.16
 OUT PROFILES -   1029 -       6.73
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP   8)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1006  1005  1062    812.55  1302.71   490.16    333.53   306.68    564.58*
 2  1006  1007  1061   -763.99   812.72  1576.71    136.86   168.98    196.45 +
 3  1014  1012  1028   -603.29   802.29  1405.58     70.19    94.60     99.71
 4  1006  1007  1008   -594.63   844.06  1438.69    307.49   282.74    441.37*+
 5  1027  1013  1014    583.64  3557.37  2973.73    170.42   164.04    815.83*+
 6  1014  1012  1003   -572.10   802.29  1374.38    278.89   258.17    396.21*+
 7  1011  1060  1010    553.52  1470.96   917.44    120.88   136.14    215.68*+
 8  1041  1045  1046    536.25  1786.54  1250.29    206.10   216.44    400.72
 9  1041  1045  1044    422.55  1786.54  1363.99    185.31   175.17    360.29
10  1023  1022  1023    380.68  3161.22  2780.55     16.39    16.44     54.00
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.16158E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.16116E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.42119E+06
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.2607 %
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  35
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER   8
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  25.90% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    19.28    25.90    39.04    57.71    73.73    86.27    98.19
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                1.51
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =         35.71 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =      4.47 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =       7.54 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =          456.49 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =   64.37 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:     14.10 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =  140
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     35.90 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    34.62    35.90    38.72    46.92    61.03    75.13    91.79
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =       4.722 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
     143410386.     143812602.        402216.     0.00280
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     91383.52  90610.55    772.97      0.85
  SECONDARY STOPS  166901.80 161743.02   5158.78      3.19
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    882.00    868.30     13.69      1.58
  QUEUING DELAYS    13765.67  13808.44    -42.78     -0.31
  CRUISE TIMES       2251.13   2247.08      4.05      0.18
  TOTAL TIME        16898.79  16923.83    -25.04     -0.15
  PCU-DISTANCE      68945.52  68809.98    135.54      0.20
  SPEED                 4.08      4.07      0.01      0.35
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1061  1007      1.0000      0.3594       0.6406        46.6      30.8
  1010  1060      0.9976      0.4989       0.4987        24.7      19.9
  1008  1063      0.8471      0.5487       0.2984        13.9      13.9
  1007  1061      0.9981      0.7151       0.2830        46.6      41.4
  1010  1063      0.5481      0.7560       0.2079        26.8      26.1
  1061  1010      0.3660      0.5310       0.1650        19.8      19.6
  1063  1008      0.6602      0.7743       0.1142        13.9      13.9
  1025  1019      1.0000      0.9305       0.0695        84.0      72.7
  1029  1055      0.7966 *    0.7394 *     0.0573       135.7     135.7
  1013  1004      0.7235 *    0.7741 *     0.0506       172.9     172.9
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =  45
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.7353
     R-SQUARED (Y = X) =     0.7263
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      2.249 SECONDS -   8 LOOPS  GAP =   4.72191%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        868.3       1696.8       2565.1   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        868.3       1696.8       2565.1
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =      13808.4      32959.3      46767.7   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =      13808.4      32959.3      46767.7
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       2247.1       2552.8       4799.9   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2247.1       2552.8       4799.9
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =      16923.8      37208.9      54132.7   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      16923.8      37208.9      54132.7
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      68810.0      78361.5     147171.5   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      68810.0      78361.5     147171.5
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =          4.1          2.1          2.7   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =          4.1          2.1          2.7
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  36
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP    9               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP    9
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =    5.155866
 BEST GAP VALUE     =    4.721914
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =    4.721914
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  37
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   1.7452              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    2.413 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
    0.262              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               62.30     3646.958     3476.625      4.90      1632.98                             1462.65      1462.65     10.43
  2     4.425      2.88     3641.773     3520.710      3.44      1629.21         3.78      0.23      1508.14      1508.14      7.43      2.22   2
  3     6.613      4.62     3634.768     3516.963      3.35      1625.20         4.00      0.25      1507.40      1508.14      7.20      3.31   3
  4     6.090      4.53     3629.738     3536.771      2.63      1621.63         3.57      0.22      1528.66      1528.66      5.73      3.05   4
  5     5.434      4.27     3628.214     3546.102      2.32      1619.11         2.52      0.156     1536.99      1536.99      5.07      2.71   5
  6     5.561      4.63     3621.035     3544.457      2.16      1616.82         2.29      0.141     1540.24      1540.24      4.74      2.78   6
  7     6.135      5.44     3610.111     3533.522      2.17      1614.46         2.36      0.146     1537.87      1540.24      4.60      3.09   7
  8     4.585      4.26     3607.944     3547.555      1.70      1612.70         1.76      0.109     1552.31      1552.31      3.74      2.37   8
  9     4.777      4.66     3598.530     3536.804      1.75      1611.26         1.44      0.089     1549.53      1552.31      3.66      2.39   9
 10     2.413      2.41     3602.106                             1610.51         0.74      0.046                                               10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     2.6143 B =    -0.5975 R-SQUARED =      89.44 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     3.4352%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.16116E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.15976E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.14005E+07
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.8690 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP   9)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
 C   9 (1041) 1042       42.40    145.23    242.55     10.62
 C  37 (1014) 1012      179.34    303.60     69.28      8.00
  1059 (1034)C  14       42.89    109.45    155.17      7.63
 C   6 (1041) 1045      346.93    219.29    -36.79      7.59
 C  37 (1028) 1012      315.85    196.77    -37.70      7.44
 C  15 (1014) 1012       22.98     73.44    219.53      7.27
  1059 (1028)C  14      372.63    263.66    -29.24      6.11
  1006  1007  1061      258.44    171.36    -33.70      5.94
  1028  1012  1014      206.50    130.64    -36.74      5.84
  1007  1061  1010      236.35    157.60    -33.32      5.61
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    2 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  2 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
   41 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  38
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER    9      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     5.540    56    20   384.25     20   198.98    2     42    583.22  0.021
  2     0.824    49    21   350.18     19    53.96    5     45    404.14  0.004
  3     0.707    50    17   311.46      9    18.47   19     45    329.93  0.003
  4     0.342    50    10   294.17      9    20.62   26     45    314.79  0.002
  5     0.528    50    12   301.25      7    11.27   26     45    312.52  0.001
  6     0.329    50    10   291.16      7    17.77   28     45    308.94  0.001
  7     0.526    50    10   299.36      6    11.53   29     45    310.90  0.000
  8     0.324    49     6   289.55      7    18.10   32     45    307.65  0.000
  9     0.521    48     6   298.28      4    11.57   35     45    309.85  0.000
 10     0.320    49     4   288.98      4    18.05   37     45    307.03  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    8 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    1 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    7 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED    13 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION  11 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.05974 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1033 -       1.50
 OUT PROFILES -   1033 -       2.35
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP   9)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1014  1012  1028    846.98  1776.94   929.95     79.21    70.19    155.34
 2  1006  1007  1061    822.54  1508.29   685.75     72.30   136.86    131.93
 3  1027  1013  1014    595.16  3559.36  2964.21    170.12   170.42    816.84*+
 4  1014  1012  1003    556.95  1776.94  1219.98    274.15   278.89    537.60*+
 5  1041  1045  1046   -506.59  1028.94  1535.53    214.42   206.10    326.64
 6  1028  1012  1014   -468.65   979.86  1448.52     51.94    71.85     78.67*+
 7  1041  1045  1044   -410.52  1028.94  1439.47    177.15   185.31    269.88
 8  1009  1063  1010    408.17  1031.39   623.22    122.23   138.46    189.00*+
 9  1023  1022  1023    383.13  3166.55  2783.42     16.34    16.39     54.00
10  1023  1022  1024    383.13  3162.80  2779.67     14.52    14.57     48.00
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.16156E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.16114E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.41787E+06
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.2586 %
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  39
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER   9
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  28.55% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    20.36    28.55    39.88    62.65    78.92    88.92    99.04
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                1.18
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =         27.92 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =      3.51 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =       5.49 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =          455.56 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =   55.68 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:     12.22 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =  133
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     34.10 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    31.54    34.10    40.00    49.23    60.51    77.44    92.82
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =       3.079 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
     143467335.     143814236.        346901.     0.00242
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     90610.55  90881.51   -270.96     -0.30
  SECONDARY STOPS  161743.02 162677.64   -934.63     -0.57
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    868.30    870.83     -2.52     -0.29
  QUEUING DELAYS    13808.44  13810.81     -2.37     -0.02
  CRUISE TIMES       2247.08   2233.83     13.25      0.59
  TOTAL TIME        16923.83  16915.47      8.36      0.05
  PCU-DISTANCE      68809.98  68407.11    402.88      0.59
  SPEED                 4.07      4.04      0.02      0.54
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1008  1063      0.4845      0.8471       0.3626        13.9      14.0
  1062  1005      0.3633      0.4945       0.1312         6.1       6.1
  1010  1061      0.2414      0.3121       0.0707        19.8      19.8
  1063  1010      0.2228      0.2843       0.0615        26.8      26.9
  1059  1034      0.6275 *    0.5782 *     0.0493       108.2     108.1
  1029  1055      0.8449 *    0.7966 *     0.0482       135.7     135.6
  1010  1063      0.5948      0.5481       0.0467        26.8      26.7
  1012  1014      0.8729 *    0.8272 *     0.0457        71.8      71.8
  1025  1017      0.9392 *    0.9795 *     0.0404        45.7      45.7
  1047  1055      0.9025 *    0.9319 *     0.0293       165.4     165.4
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =  43
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.9437
     R-SQUARED (Y = X) =     0.9404
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      2.458 SECONDS -   9 LOOPS  GAP =   3.07856%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        870.8       1706.6       2577.4   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        870.8       1706.6       2577.4
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =      13810.8      33041.2      46852.0   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =      13810.8      33041.2      46852.0
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       2233.8       2545.5       4779.3   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2233.8       2545.5       4779.3
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =      16915.5      37293.3      54208.8   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      16915.5      37293.3      54208.8
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      68407.1      78175.8     146582.9   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      68407.1      78175.8     146582.9
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =          4.0          2.1          2.7   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =          4.0          2.1          2.7
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  40
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP   10               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP   10
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =    3.435208
 BEST GAP VALUE     =    3.078564
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =    3.078564
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  41
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   1.5394              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    3.231 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
    0.079              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               67.20     3644.604     3524.417      3.41      1634.13                             1513.95      1513.95      7.35
  2     4.755      3.36     3646.975     3554.538      2.60      1631.28         2.86      0.175     1538.84      1538.84      5.67      2.38   2
  3     5.011      3.72     3641.724     3559.394      2.31      1628.97         2.31      0.142     1546.64      1546.64      5.05      2.50   3
  4     5.134      4.02     3646.149     3567.270      2.21      1626.84         2.13      0.131     1547.96      1547.96      4.85      2.58   4
  5     4.556      3.74     3643.686     3579.295      1.80      1625.03         1.81      0.111     1560.64      1560.64      3.96      2.29   5
  6     3.624      3.08     3637.889     3577.920      1.68      1623.87         1.17      0.072     1563.90      1563.90      3.69      1.81   6
  7     4.904      4.39     3641.090     3573.488      1.89      1622.39         1.47      0.091     1554.79      1563.90      3.61      2.46   7
  8     3.622      3.36     3634.381     3581.145      1.49      1621.17         1.22      0.076     1567.93      1567.93      3.28      2.09   8
  9     4.022      3.89     3631.508     3576.452      1.54      1620.10         1.07      0.066     1565.04      1567.93      3.22      2.01   9
 10     3.231      3.23     3627.833                             1619.21         0.89      0.055                                               10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     1.9627 B =    -0.3626 R-SQUARED =      96.31 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     3.0993%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.16114E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.16027E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.86912E+06
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.5393 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP  10)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
  1012  1028  1059       25.15    114.15    353.82     10.66
  1028  1012  1014      130.64    251.55     92.55      8.75
 C   6 (1041) 1045      219.29    330.93     50.91      6.73
  1014  1012  1028      324.78    218.26    -32.80      6.46
  1012 (1014)C  37      207.24    307.79     48.52      6.27
 C  37 (1014) 1012      303.60    204.03    -32.80      6.25
 C  37 (1028) 1012      196.77    281.43     43.02      5.47
  1056  1018  1043      369.69    280.26    -24.19      4.96
  1041  1045  1044      388.20    490.79     26.43      4.89
  1006  1007  1061      171.36    115.16    -32.80      4.70
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    1 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  2 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
   41 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  42
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER   10      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     4.764    56    20   392.78     22   127.13    3     45    519.91  0.018
  2     0.502    50    14   330.98     19    29.28   11     44    360.25  0.015
  3     0.339    50    14   338.82      9    31.89   21     44    370.71  0.004
  4     0.230    50     8   311.43      8    20.56   28     44    331.99  0.001
  5     0.221    48     7   308.63      8    17.22   29     44    325.86  0.001
  6     0.219    46     6   307.50      8    15.43   30     44    322.93  0.000
  7     0.219    46     4   306.96      3    14.47   37     44    321.43  0.000
  8     0.218    44     3   306.78      3    14.34   38     44    321.12  0.000
  9     0.218    44     2   306.68      2    14.21   40     44    320.89  0.000
 10     0.218    45     2   306.70      2    14.21   40     44    320.91  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    7 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    7 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED    11 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION  11 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.01628 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1033 -       1.44
 OUT PROFILES -   1033 -       1.04
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP  10)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1014  1012  1028   -599.31   990.74  1590.05     63.87    79.21     97.44
 2  1027  1013  1014    589.94  3554.57  2964.63    171.31   170.12    815.05*+
 3  1041  1045  1046    421.01  1739.69  1318.69    208.85   214.42    400.63
 4  1028  1012  1014    417.15  1493.88  1076.73     88.91    51.94    160.09*+
 5  1014  1012  1003   -402.17   990.74  1392.91    286.25   274.15    436.72*+
 6  1023  1022  1023    386.14  3172.20  2786.06     16.28    16.34     54.00
 7  1023  1022  1024    386.14  3168.45  2782.31     14.47    14.52     48.00
 8  1023  1022  1008    386.14  3164.70  2778.56    248.61   251.84    824.61
 9  1023  1022  1031    386.14  3160.95  2774.81    364.61   363.49   1209.39
10  1041  1045  1044    379.46  1739.69  1360.24    182.61   177.15    350.30
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.16055E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.16042E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.12655E+06
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0788 %
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  43
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER  10
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  33.13% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    24.82    33.13    45.54    68.19    83.73    91.08    99.04
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                0.97
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =         22.77 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =      2.88 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =       4.53 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =          446.23 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =   52.16 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:     11.69 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =  142
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     36.41 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    34.87    36.41    40.26    51.79    65.64    80.51    93.33
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =       2.549 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
     142732922.     142875445.        142523.     0.00100
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     90881.51  90040.63    840.88      0.93
  SECONDARY STOPS  162677.64 157489.58   5188.06      3.29
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    870.83    853.48     17.35      2.03
  QUEUING DELAYS    13810.81  13820.46     -9.65     -0.07
  CRUISE TIMES       2233.83   2239.62     -5.79     -0.26
  TOTAL TIME        16915.47  16913.56      1.91      0.01
  PCU-DISTANCE      68407.11  68576.53   -169.42     -0.25
  SPEED                 4.04      4.05     -0.01     -0.26
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1044  1045      0.7306 *    0.2604 *     0.4703       125.6     125.6
  1005  1062      0.7499      0.9981       0.2482         6.1       6.1
  1008  1063      0.6874      0.4845       0.2028        13.9      13.9
  1062  1061      0.3618      0.4463       0.0845         4.9       4.9
  1029  1055      0.9180 *    0.8449 *     0.0731       135.7     135.7
  1025  1017      0.9994 *    0.9392 *     0.0603        45.7      45.7
  1061  1010      0.3242      0.3800       0.0559        19.8      19.8
  1062  1005      0.4184      0.3633       0.0551         6.1       6.1
  1010  1063      0.5418      0.5948       0.0530        26.8      26.8
  1010  1061      0.2728      0.2414       0.0314        19.8      19.8
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =  42
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.8698
     R-SQUARED (Y = X) =     0.8614
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      2.668 SECONDS -  10 LOOPS  GAP =   2.54879%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        853.5       1667.7       2521.1   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        853.5       1667.7       2521.1
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =      13820.5      32495.9      46316.3   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =      13820.5      32495.9      46316.3
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       2239.6       2545.1       4784.8   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2239.6       2545.1       4784.8
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =      16913.6      36708.7      53622.2   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      16913.6      36708.7      53622.2
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      68576.5      78138.8     146715.3   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      68576.5      78138.8     146715.3
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =          4.1          2.1          2.7   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =          4.1          2.1          2.7
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  44
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP   11               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP   11
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =    3.099263
 BEST GAP VALUE     =    2.548787
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =    2.548787
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  45
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   1.1369              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    2.880 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
    0.009              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               73.08     3625.316     3534.591      2.57      1626.42                             1535.70      1535.70      5.58
  2     1.999      1.49     3620.261     3550.710      1.96      1625.51         0.91      0.056     1555.96      1555.96      4.28      1.00   2
  3     5.719      4.52     3619.472     3547.844      2.02      1623.53         1.98      0.122     1551.90      1555.96      4.16      2.85   3
  4     3.890      3.20     3612.047     3559.822      1.47      1622.14         1.39      0.086     1569.91      1569.91      3.22      2.06   4
  5     3.239      2.75     3612.037     3556.905      1.55      1621.29         0.85      0.052     1566.16      1569.91      3.17      1.62   5
  6     3.244      2.85     3609.327     3562.655      1.31      1620.40         0.89      0.055     1573.72      1573.72      2.88      1.74   6
  7     4.000      3.66     3608.453     3562.612      1.29      1619.46         0.94      0.058     1573.62      1573.72      2.82      2.01   7
  8     3.270      3.10     3603.706     3560.917      1.20      1618.70         0.76      0.047     1575.91      1575.91      2.64      1.65   8
  9     2.537      2.46     3603.372     3562.865      1.14      1618.16         0.54      0.033     1577.65      1577.65      2.50      1.26   9
 10     2.880      2.88     3596.797                             1617.58         0.58      0.036                                               10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     1.7597 B =    -0.3803 R-SQUARED =      97.37 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     2.4050%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.16042E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.15989E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.53838E+06
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.3356 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP  11)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
  1042  1044  1047       13.71     47.02    242.90      6.04
  1044  1047  1048        1.04     19.34   1762.06      5.73
  1008  1007  1061      575.31    713.27     23.98      5.44
  1012  1028  1059      114.15    179.14     56.93      5.37
 C   6 (1041) 1045      330.93    243.28    -26.49      5.17
  1007  1061            690.46    824.67     19.44      4.88
 C  37 (1028) 1012      281.43    205.66    -26.92      4.86
 C  37 (1014) 1012      204.03    279.19     36.84      4.84
  1028  1012  1014      251.55    184.05    -26.83      4.57
  1019 (1020)C  16       98.24    147.69     50.34      4.46
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    0 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  1 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
   42 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  46
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER   11      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     3.247    56    14   330.27     30   165.06    1     45    495.34  0.025
  2     1.039    50    19   346.91     13    11.75   12     44    358.65  0.007
  3     0.513    50    10   301.50      7     5.94   27     44    307.44  0.001
  4     0.479    50    11   295.51      4     6.04   29     44    301.55  0.001
  5     0.467    48     4   292.16      3     2.18   37     44    294.34  0.000
  6     0.465    47     3   291.93      1     1.16   40     44    293.09  0.000
  7     0.465    44     3   291.91      1     1.14   40     44    293.05  0.000
  8     0.465    44     3   291.90      1     1.14   40     44    293.05  0.000
  9     0.465    41     3   291.90      1     1.14   40     44    293.04  0.000
 10     0.465    43     3   291.90      1     1.14   40     44    293.04  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    7 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    7 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   18 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED    13 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION  11 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.00019 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1010 -       0.00
 OUT PROFILES -   1053 -       0.01
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP  11)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1027  1013  1014    594.84  3557.88  2963.04    170.21   171.31    814.36*+
 2  1014  1012  1028    458.94  1538.55  1079.61     72.27    63.87    132.16
 3  1023  1022  1023    380.78  3169.65  2788.86     16.31    16.28     54.00
 4  1023  1022  1024    380.78  3165.90  2785.11     14.49    14.47     48.00
 5  1023  1022  1008    380.78  3162.15  2781.36    250.79   248.61    830.56
 6  1023  1022  1031    380.78  3158.40  2777.61    363.38   364.61   1203.44
 7  1041  1045  1046   -341.79  1151.20  1492.99    213.94   208.85    340.45
 8  1014  1012  1003    335.21  1538.55  1203.34    281.55   286.25    514.87*+
 9  1007  1061  1005    312.61   470.29   157.68      0.02     0.03      0.02
10  1028  1012  1014   -311.45  1125.23  1436.68     71.82    88.91    114.62*+
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.16031E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.16018E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.13423E+06
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0837 %
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  47
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER  11
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  37.35% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    26.87    37.35    51.45    74.58    85.54    92.05    99.04
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                0.79
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =         18.03 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =      2.28 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =       3.72 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =          449.90 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =   37.35 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:      8.30 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =  155
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     39.74 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    35.64    39.74    46.41    60.26    72.31    85.64    96.41
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =       1.573 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
     142493347.     142621318.        127971.     0.00090
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     90040.63  90586.13   -545.49     -0.60
  SECONDARY STOPS  157489.58 161789.95  -4300.38     -2.66
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    853.48    864.44    -10.96     -1.27
  QUEUING DELAYS    13820.46  13773.62     46.84      0.34
  CRUISE TIMES       2239.62   2242.52     -2.90     -0.13
  TOTAL TIME        16913.56  16880.58     32.98      0.20
  PCU-DISTANCE      68576.53  68677.32   -100.79     -0.15
  SPEED                 4.05      4.07     -0.01     -0.34
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1044  1045      0.2894 *    0.7306 *     0.4412       125.6     125.6
  1008  1063      0.7863      0.6874       0.0990        13.9      13.9
  1012  1014      0.9324 *    0.8722 *     0.0602        71.8      71.8
  1005  1062      0.7934      0.7499       0.0435         6.1       6.1
  1029  1055      0.9518 *    0.9180 *     0.0338       135.7     135.7
  1059  1034      0.6625 *    0.6364 *     0.0261       108.2     108.2
  1063  1010      0.2719      0.2536       0.0183        26.8      26.8
  1060  1011      0.4835      0.4716       0.0119        86.1      86.1
  1012  1003      0.3009 *    0.2909 *     0.0100       103.1     103.1
  1062  1061      0.3713      0.3618       0.0095         4.9       4.9
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =  42
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.9213
     R-SQUARED (Y = X) =     0.9209
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      2.872 SECONDS -  11 LOOPS  GAP =   1.57315%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        864.4       1666.0       2530.4   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        864.4       1666.0       2530.4
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =      13773.6      32451.9      46225.6   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =      13773.6      32451.9      46225.6
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       2242.5       2539.5       4782.1   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2242.5       2539.5       4782.1
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =      16880.6      36657.4      53538.0   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      16880.6      36657.4      53538.0
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      68677.3      77986.1     146663.4   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      68677.3      77986.1     146663.4
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =          4.1          2.1          2.7   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =          4.1          2.1          2.7
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  48
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP   12               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP   12
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =    2.404977
 BEST GAP VALUE     =    1.573148
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =    1.573148
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  49
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   0.9932              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    2.896 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
   -0.031              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               74.77     3615.622     3559.475      1.58      1619.50                             1563.36      1563.36      3.47
  2     3.290      2.54     3610.602     3558.987      1.45      1618.58         0.92      0.057     1566.97      1566.97      3.19      1.64   2
  3     3.153      2.52     3612.676     3563.922      1.37      1617.77         0.81      0.050     1569.01      1569.01      3.01      1.58   3
  4     3.583      2.97     3610.006     3564.974      1.26      1616.89         0.87      0.054     1571.86      1571.86      2.79      1.79   4
  5     3.191      2.73     3608.845     3566.841      1.18      1616.18         0.72      0.044     1574.17      1574.17      2.60      1.59   5
  6     4.161      3.71     3604.512     3566.844      1.06      1615.30         0.87      0.054     1577.63      1577.63      2.33      2.08   6
  7     2.239      2.04     3606.796     3571.794      0.98      1614.88         0.42      0.026     1579.88      1579.88      2.17      1.12   7
  8     2.737      2.57     3602.030     3565.250      1.03      1614.40         0.48      0.030     1577.62      1579.88      2.14      1.37   8
  9     3.351      3.25     3603.153     3567.718      0.99      1613.78         0.62      0.038     1578.35      1579.88      2.10      1.78   9
 10     2.896      2.90     3600.112                             1613.27         0.51      0.032                                               10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     1.5074 B =    -0.3594 R-SQUARED =      90.98 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     2.0230%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.16018E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.15983E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.35165E+06
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.2195 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP  12)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
 C  37 (1014) 1012      279.19    208.75    -25.23      4.51
  1028  1012  1014      184.05    246.34     33.84      4.25
  1060 (1009)C  24        2.24     14.41    542.62      4.22
  1012 (1014)C  37      285.15    359.11     25.94      4.12
 C  37 (1028) 1012      205.66    268.73     30.67      4.10
  1014  1012  1028      273.38    210.35    -23.05      4.05
 C   6 (1041) 1045      243.28    307.96     26.59      3.90
 C  11 (1056) 1017       17.64     36.60    107.44      3.64
  1004  1062  1005      372.62    308.29    -17.26      3.49
  1007  1061  1010      144.68    108.18    -25.23      3.25
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    1 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  2 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
   40 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  50
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER   12      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     2.552    56    16   336.40     26    81.13    1     43    417.53  0.017
  2     0.304    50    20   322.14     10     5.23   12     42    327.37  0.005
  3     0.038    50    14   296.96      4     5.53   23     41    302.49  0.001
  4     0.004    50     4   290.90      2     0.45   35     41    291.35  0.000
  5     0.000    48     2   290.36      0     0.00   39     41    290.36  0.000
  6     0.000    42     2   290.35      0     0.00   39     41    290.35  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    7 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    7 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED    13 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION   7 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.01652 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1010 -       0.00
 OUT PROFILES -   1029 -       0.53
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP  12)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1027  1013  1014    592.91  3557.43  2964.53    170.24   170.21    813.63*+
 2  1014  1012  1028   -432.22   989.04  1421.27     62.72    72.27     95.59
 3  1023  1022  1023    381.51  3169.11  2787.60     16.31    16.31     54.00
 4  1023  1022  1024    381.51  3165.36  2783.85     14.50    14.49     48.00
 5  1023  1022  1008    381.51  3161.61  2780.10    249.74   250.79    826.80
 6  1023  1022  1031    381.51  3157.86  2776.35    364.64   363.38   1207.20
 7  1014  1012  1003   -311.66   989.04  1300.70    290.40   281.55    442.63*+
 8  1015  1014  1016    290.47  2997.39  2706.92    153.44   151.66    459.44
 9  1015  1014  1012    290.47  2994.89  2704.42     93.21    96.82    279.10
10  1015  1014  1013    290.47  2992.39  2701.92    196.20   193.49    587.47
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.15958E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.15946E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.12253E+06
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0768 %
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  51
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER  12
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  44.22% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    31.81    44.22    59.28    78.80    89.28    92.77    99.64
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                0.59
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =         12.78 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =      1.62 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =       2.55 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =          448.10 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =   29.16 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:      6.51 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =  154
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     39.49 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    36.15    39.49    48.46    67.95    82.31    92.31    98.21
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =       1.429 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
     141769960.     141899591.        129631.     0.00091
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     90586.13  90468.29    117.84      0.13
  SECONDARY STOPS  161789.95 159132.17   2657.78      1.67
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    864.44    856.60      7.84      0.91
  QUEUING DELAYS    13773.62  13757.80     15.82      0.11
  CRUISE TIMES       2242.52   2245.45     -2.93     -0.13
  TOTAL TIME        16880.58  16859.85     20.73      0.12
  PCU-DISTANCE      68677.32  68764.30    -86.98     -0.13
  SPEED                 4.07      4.08     -0.01     -0.25
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1044  1045      1.0000      0.2894 *     0.7106       125.6     123.5
  1029  1055      0.9788 *    0.9518 *     0.0270       135.7     135.7
  1012  1014      0.9545 *    0.9324 *     0.0221        71.8      71.8
  1063  1008      0.5918      0.6093       0.0174        13.9      13.9
  1019  1025      0.6915      0.7049       0.0134        84.0      84.0
  1005  1062      0.8063      0.7934       0.0128         6.1       6.1
  1062  1005      0.4314      0.4195       0.0119         6.1       6.1
  1063  1010      0.2819      0.2719       0.0099        26.8      26.8
  1062  1061      0.3804      0.3713       0.0091         4.9       4.9
  1008  1063      0.7775      0.7863       0.0089        13.9      13.9
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =  41
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.8193
     R-SQUARED (Y = X) =     0.8124
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      2.996 SECONDS -  12 LOOPS  GAP =   1.42879%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        856.6       1649.5       2506.1   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        856.6       1649.5       2506.1
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =      13757.8      32257.2      46015.0   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =      13757.8      32257.2      46015.0
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       2245.5       2539.1       4784.5   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2245.5       2539.1       4784.5
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =      16859.9      36445.8      53305.7   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      16859.9      36445.8      53305.7
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      68764.3      77958.0     146722.3   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      68764.3      77958.0     146722.3
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =          4.1          2.1          2.8   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =          4.1          2.1          2.8
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  52
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP   13               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP   13
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =    2.023022
 BEST GAP VALUE     =    1.428794
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =    1.428794
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  53
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   0.8068              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    1.951 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
   -0.006              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               77.75     3601.338     3549.980      1.45      1612.66                             1561.30      1561.30      3.18
  2     3.528      2.84     3597.398     3553.464      1.24      1611.75         0.91      0.056     1567.82      1567.82      2.73      1.76   2
  3     2.661      2.20     3598.259     3560.160      1.07      1611.17         0.59      0.036     1573.07      1573.07      2.36      1.33   3
  4     3.562      3.06     3592.392     3554.439      1.07      1610.49         0.68      0.042     1572.54      1573.07      2.32      1.78   4
  5     2.398      2.11     3593.145     3560.569      0.91      1610.04         0.46      0.028     1577.46      1577.46      2.02      1.22   5
  6     2.547      2.30     3593.296     3561.162      0.90      1609.62         0.41      0.026     1577.49      1577.49      2.00      1.27   6
  7     2.699      2.50     3589.848     3559.039      0.87      1609.19         0.43      0.027     1578.38      1578.38      1.91      1.35   7
  8     2.744      2.62     3587.364     3558.931      0.80      1608.76         0.42      0.026     1580.33      1580.33      1.77      1.37   8
  9     2.724      2.67     3587.587     3558.874      0.81      1608.38         0.39      0.024     1579.66      1580.33      1.74      1.36   9
 10     1.951      1.95     3590.352                             1608.10         0.28      0.0174                                              10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     1.1769 B =    -0.2820 R-SQUARED =      91.37 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     1.6927%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.15946E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.15920E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.26585E+06
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.1667 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP  13)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
 C   6 (1041) 1045      307.96    240.67    -21.85      4.06
 C  37 (1028) 1012      268.73    208.93    -22.25      3.87
 C  37 (1014) 1012      208.75    267.84     28.31      3.83
 C  15 (1014) 1012       59.94     88.70     47.99      3.34
  1041  1045  1044      456.17    389.90    -14.53      3.22
  1028  1012  1014      246.34    201.41    -18.24      3.00
  1012  1028  1059      220.49    264.85     20.12      2.85
  1050  1048            164.72    131.01    -20.46      2.77
  1042  1044  1047       35.16     53.06     50.91      2.70
  1044  1047  1048       14.46     26.60     83.96      2.68
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    0 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  1 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
   39 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  54
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER   13      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     2.123    56    17   333.74     23    72.50    3     43    406.23  0.022
  2     0.159    50    15   317.06     14     5.17   14     43    322.22  0.002
  3     0.040    50    10   308.15      5     2.50   28     43    310.65  0.000
  4     0.006    49     5   304.81      3     0.96   35     43    305.77  0.000
  5     0.000    48     3   304.01      0     0.00   40     43    304.01  0.000
  6     0.000    46     3   304.00      0     0.00   40     43    304.00  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    7 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    7 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED    13 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION   7 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.02047 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1061 -       0.00
 OUT PROFILES -   1029 -       0.66
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP  13)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1027  1013  1014    593.91  3558.34  2964.43    169.82   170.24    812.92*+
 2  1014  1012  1028    406.33  1457.65  1051.32     66.93    62.72    119.38
 3  1023  1022  1023    379.78  3167.11  2787.33     16.33    16.31     54.00
 4  1023  1022  1024    379.78  3163.36  2783.58     14.52    14.50     48.00
 5  1023  1022  1008    379.78  3159.61  2779.83    250.27   249.74    827.56
 6  1023  1022  1031    379.78  3155.86  2776.08    364.85   364.64   1206.44
 7  1015  1014  1016    296.01  3000.74  2704.73    153.42   153.44    460.13
 8  1015  1014  1012    296.01  2998.24  2702.23     94.35    93.21    282.96
 9  1015  1014  1013    296.01  2995.74  2699.73    194.36   196.20    582.91
10  1014  1012  1003    275.31  1457.65  1182.34    286.99   290.40    511.93*+
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.15954E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.15947E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.70623E+05
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0443 %
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  55
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER  13
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  48.92% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    33.61    48.92    67.47    83.61    89.64    93.73    99.64
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                0.47
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =         10.07 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =      1.28 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =       2.03 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =          450.43 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =   26.45 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:      5.87 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =  176
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     45.13 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    40.77    45.13    51.03    71.03    83.08    93.59    98.21
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =       1.020 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
     141776512.     141845357.         68845.     0.00049
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     90468.29  90659.35   -191.06     -0.21
  SECONDARY STOPS  159132.17 160738.16  -1605.98     -1.00
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    856.60    864.39     -7.79     -0.90
  QUEUING DELAYS    13757.80  13742.00     15.80      0.11
  CRUISE TIMES       2245.45   2243.66      1.79      0.08
  TOTAL TIME        16859.85  16850.05      9.80      0.06
  PCU-DISTANCE      68764.30  68724.02     40.28      0.06
  SPEED                 4.08      4.08      0.00      0.00
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1044  1045      0.3007 *    1.0000       0.6993       125.6     125.6
  1012  1014      0.9930 *    0.9545 *     0.0386        71.8      71.8
  1005  1062      0.8415      0.8063       0.0353         6.1       6.1
  1008  1063      0.7558      0.7775       0.0216        13.9      13.9
  1063  1008      0.5769      0.5918       0.0150        13.9      13.9
  1019  1025      0.7058      0.6915       0.0143        84.0      84.0
  1029  1055      0.9883 *    0.9788 *     0.0095       135.7     135.6
  1021  1003      0.5114 *    0.5019 *     0.0095       111.1     111.1
  1019  1002      0.5020 *    0.4949 *     0.0071        28.0      28.0
  1063  1010      0.2882      0.2819       0.0063        26.8      26.8
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =  40
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.8038
     R-SQUARED (Y = X) =     0.7774
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      3.125 SECONDS -  13 LOOPS  GAP =   1.02035%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        864.4       1654.9       2519.2   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        864.4       1654.9       2519.2
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =      13742.0      32227.7      45969.7   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =      13742.0      32227.7      45969.7
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       2243.7       2539.6       4783.3   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2243.7       2539.6       4783.3
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =      16850.1      36422.2      53272.2   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      16850.1      36422.2      53272.2
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      68724.0      77983.6     146707.6   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      68724.0      77983.6     146707.6
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =          4.1          2.1          2.8   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =          4.1          2.1          2.8
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  56
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP   14               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP   14
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =    1.692663
 BEST GAP VALUE     =    1.020351
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =    1.020351
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  57
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   0.6300              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    2.190 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
    0.008              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               80.17     3601.772     3564.825      1.04      1612.58                             1575.64      1575.64      2.29
  2     3.098      2.56     3598.714     3559.829      1.09      1612.01         0.57      0.035     1573.13      1575.64      2.26      1.55   2
  3     2.769      2.36     3601.277     3569.248      0.90      1611.47         0.54      0.033     1579.44      1579.44      1.99      1.48   3
  4     2.915      2.55     3596.469     3562.110      0.96      1611.01         0.47      0.029     1576.65      1579.44      1.96      1.46   4
  5     2.601      2.34     3600.046     3570.654      0.82      1610.56         0.45      0.028     1581.17      1581.17      1.82      1.42   5
  6     2.152      1.98     3596.595     3569.289      0.77      1610.24         0.32      0.0196    1582.94      1582.94      1.70      1.08   6
  7     1.871      1.75     3599.446     3575.374      0.67      1609.99         0.26      0.0159    1585.92      1585.92      1.50      0.94   7
  8     2.425      2.33     3598.257     3571.417      0.75      1609.70         0.29      0.0181    1582.86      1585.92      1.48      1.21   8
  9     1.803      1.76     3597.957     3575.431      0.63      1609.46         0.24      0.0150    1586.93      1586.93      1.40      1.02   9
 10     2.190      2.19     3596.491                             1609.21         0.25      0.0153                                              10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     1.3390 B =    -0.4610 R-SQUARED =      95.77 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     1.3332%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.15947E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.15927E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.19619E+06
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.1230 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP  14)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
 C   6 (1041) 1045      240.67    323.35     34.35      4.92
 C   9 (1041) 1042       41.46     70.99     71.24      3.94
 C  37 (1014) 1012      267.84    214.73    -19.83      3.42
 C  37 (1028) 1012      208.93    259.56     24.23      3.31
  1014  1012  1028      245.65    196.94    -19.83      3.27
 C  15 (1028) 1012       48.78     73.28     50.22      3.14
  1041  1045  1044      389.90    451.48     15.79      3.00
 C   6 (1046) 1045      850.07    767.58     -9.70      2.90
  1028  1012  1014      201.41    242.37     20.34      2.75
  1042 (1044)C   9       83.38    106.33     27.51      2.36
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    1 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  2 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
   39 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  58
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER   14      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     1.632    56    25   340.65     16    52.96    2     43    393.61  0.006
  2     0.155    50    20   322.01      8     3.25   15     43    325.26  0.002
  3     0.043    50    10   307.92      3     1.74   30     43    309.66  0.000
  4     0.003    49     3   306.60      1     0.29   39     43    306.89  0.000
  5     0.000    48     3   306.59      0     0.00   40     43    306.59  0.000
  6     0.000    43     3   306.58      0     0.00   40     43    306.58  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    7 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    7 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED    11 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION   7 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.02346 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1049 -       0.00
 OUT PROFILES -   1029 -       0.75
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP  14)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1027  1013  1014    592.04  3556.89  2964.85    170.17   169.82    812.38*+
 2  1023  1022  1023    380.89  3167.23  2786.34     16.33    16.33     54.00
 3  1023  1022  1024    380.89  3163.48  2782.59     14.51    14.52     48.00
 4  1023  1022  1008    380.89  3159.73  2778.84    251.97   250.27    833.23
 5  1023  1022  1031    380.89  3155.98  2775.09    363.11   364.85   1200.77
 6  1014  1012  1028   -305.42  1056.72  1362.14     58.51    66.93     91.38
 7  1015  1014  1016    291.56  2998.10  2706.54    154.52   153.42    462.84
 8  1015  1014  1012    291.56  2995.60  2704.04     92.08    94.35    275.81
 9  1015  1014  1013    291.56  2993.10  2701.54    196.09   194.36    587.34
10  1041  1045  1046    280.31  1544.55  1264.24    210.58   214.74    381.12
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.15974E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.15970E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.45511E+05
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0285 %
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  59
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER  14
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  55.54% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    37.11    55.54    71.45    86.75    92.17    99.28    99.76
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                0.38
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =          8.27 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =      1.05 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =       1.77 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =          450.36 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =   22.99 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:      5.11 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =  189
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     48.46 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    39.74    48.46    57.44    73.33    85.64    94.87    97.95
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =       0.924 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
     142008843.     142051067.         42224.     0.00030
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     90659.35  90175.12    484.23      0.54
  SECONDARY STOPS  160738.16 158391.59   2346.56      1.48
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    864.39    857.36      7.03      0.82
  QUEUING DELAYS    13742.00  13744.11     -2.11     -0.02
  CRUISE TIMES       2243.66   2242.54      1.12      0.05
  TOTAL TIME        16850.05  16844.01      6.04      0.04
  PCU-DISTANCE      68724.02  68691.25     32.77      0.05
  SPEED                 4.08      4.08      0.00      0.01
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1044  1045      0.5306 *    0.3007 *     0.2299       125.6     125.6
  1008  1063      0.7880      0.7558       0.0322        13.9      13.9
  1019  1025      0.7285      0.7058       0.0227        84.0      84.0
  1005  1062      0.8245      0.8415       0.0171         6.1       6.1
  1063  1010      0.3015      0.2882       0.0133        26.8      26.8
  1063  1008      0.5667      0.5769       0.0101        13.9      13.9
  1019  1002      0.5105 *    0.5020 *     0.0085        28.0      28.0
  1047  1055      0.9410 *    0.9332 *     0.0078       165.4     165.4
  1059  1034      0.6607 *    0.6683 *     0.0077       108.2     108.2
  1029  1055      0.9953 *    0.9883 *     0.0070       135.7     135.7
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =  40
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.9760
     R-SQUARED (Y = X) =     0.9751
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      3.251 SECONDS -  14 LOOPS  GAP =   0.92352%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        857.4       1647.5       2504.8   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        857.4       1647.5       2504.8
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =      13744.1      32177.3      45921.4   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =      13744.1      32177.3      45921.4
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       2242.5       2539.8       4782.3   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2242.5       2539.8       4782.3
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =      16844.0      36364.6      53208.6   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      16844.0      36364.6      53208.6
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      68691.3      77989.1     146680.3   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      68691.3      77989.1     146680.3
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =          4.1          2.1          2.8   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =          4.1          2.1          2.8
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  60
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP   15               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP   15
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =    1.333226
 BEST GAP VALUE     =    0.923521
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =    0.923521
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  61
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   0.6461              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    1.501 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
    0.130              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               81.81     3606.452     3573.594      0.92      1615.00                             1582.14      1582.14      2.03
  2     3.118      2.63     3602.369     3568.398      0.95      1614.49         0.51      0.032     1580.52      1582.14      2.00      1.56   2
  3     2.231      1.93     3603.954     3577.417      0.74      1614.11         0.38      0.024     1587.57      1587.57      1.64      1.17   3
  4     2.509      2.22     3601.172     3572.097      0.81      1613.78         0.33      0.021     1584.70      1587.57      1.62      1.25   4
  5     1.962      1.77     3601.345     3577.784      0.66      1613.49         0.29      0.0177    1589.93      1589.93      1.46      1.09   5
  6     2.377      2.20     3599.945     3573.947      0.73      1613.21         0.28      0.0173    1587.21      1589.93      1.44      1.19   6
  7     1.701      1.60     3600.214     3578.384      0.61      1612.99         0.22      0.0137    1591.16      1591.16      1.35      0.95   7
  8     1.774      1.70     3599.551     3579.055      0.57      1612.80         0.194     0.0120    1592.30      1592.30      1.27      0.89   8
  9     2.668      2.63     3594.862     3571.784      0.65      1612.53         0.27      0.0169    1589.45      1592.30      1.25      1.33   9
 10     1.501      1.50     3596.754                             1612.35         0.17      0.0107                                              10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     0.8649 B =    -0.2920 R-SQUARED =      93.55 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     1.2161%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.15970E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.15955E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.15053E+06
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0943 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP  15)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
 C   6 (1041) 1045      323.35    265.66    -17.84      3.36
  1041  1045  1044      451.48    394.60    -12.60      2.77
  1014  1012  1028      196.94    237.47     20.58      2.75
 C  37 (1014) 1012      214.73    254.84     18.68      2.62
 C  37 (1028) 1012      259.56    219.42    -15.46      2.59
  1028  1012  1014      242.37    207.46    -14.41      2.33
  1042  1044  1045      229.08    262.18     14.45      2.11
 C   6 (1046) 1045      767.58    824.40      7.40      2.01
 C  15 (1014) 1012       71.11     89.07     25.26      2.01
  1034  1059  1028      106.81     87.38    -18.19      1.97
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    2 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  2 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
   38 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  62
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER   15      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     1.569    56    16   330.47     25    65.25    2     43    395.72  0.011
  2     0.152    50    18   337.49     10     5.98   15     43    343.47  0.003
  3     0.028    50    11   317.84      5     5.16   27     43    322.99  0.000
  4     0.002    50     6   314.90      4     3.67   33     43    318.57  0.000
  5     0.000    46     3   314.18      1     2.83   39     43    317.01  0.000
  6     0.000    46     3   314.17      1     2.83   39     43    317.00  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    7 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    7 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED    11 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION   7 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.02316 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1004 -       0.00
 OUT PROFILES -   1029 -       0.74
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP  15)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1027  1013  1014    592.53  3556.82  2964.30    170.07   170.17    811.90*+
 2  1023  1022  1023    378.30  3164.70  2786.40     16.35    16.33     54.00
 3  1023  1022  1024    378.30  3160.95  2782.65     14.54    14.51     48.00
 4  1023  1022  1008    378.30  3157.20  2778.90    253.65   251.97    837.53
 5  1023  1022  1031    378.30  3153.45  2775.15    362.36   363.11   1196.47
 6  1015  1014  1016    296.07  3001.18  2705.11    154.17   154.52    462.50
 7  1015  1014  1012    296.07  2998.68  2702.61     93.29    92.08    279.86
 8  1015  1014  1013    296.07  2996.18  2700.11    194.56   196.09    583.64
 9  1014  1012  1028    246.62  1378.32  1131.70     66.07    58.51    114.95
10  1041  1045  1046   -224.35  1181.36  1405.72    215.62   210.58    346.74
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.15966E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.15961E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.48412E+05
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0303 %
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  63
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER  15
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  56.75% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    42.53    56.75    74.22    87.83    92.41    99.64   100.00
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                0.34
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =          7.57 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =      0.96 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =       1.56 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =          452.27 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =   22.64 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:      5.01 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =  183
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     46.92 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    41.54    46.92    58.72    73.33    88.72    96.15    97.95
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =       0.855 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
     141925596.     141968973.         43378.     0.00031
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     90175.12  90563.11   -387.99     -0.43
  SECONDARY STOPS  158391.59 160399.86  -2008.27     -1.25
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    857.36    864.06     -6.70     -0.78
  QUEUING DELAYS    13744.11  13720.56     23.55      0.17
  CRUISE TIMES       2242.54   2243.04     -0.50     -0.02
  TOTAL TIME        16844.01  16827.66     16.34      0.10
  PCU-DISTANCE      68691.25  68710.48    -19.23     -0.03
  SPEED                 4.08      4.08     -0.01     -0.12
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1044  1045      0.3067 *    0.5306 *     0.2238       125.6     125.6
  1005  1062      0.8513      0.8245       0.0269         6.1       6.1
  1008  1063      0.8084      0.7880       0.0204        13.9      13.9
  1021  1003      0.5205 *    0.5070 *     0.0135       111.1     111.1
  1063  1010      0.3131      0.3015       0.0115        26.8      26.8
  1012  1014      0.9974 *    0.9864 *     0.0111        71.8      71.8
  1062  1005      0.4424      0.4317       0.0107         6.1       6.1
  1062  1061      0.3913      0.3818       0.0095         4.9       4.9
  1060  1011      0.4996      0.4917       0.0079        86.1      86.1
  1019  1002      0.5177 *    0.5105 *     0.0072        28.0      28.0
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =  40
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.9773
     R-SQUARED (Y = X) =     0.9772
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      3.385 SECONDS -  15 LOOPS  GAP =   0.85527%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        864.1       1646.9       2511.0   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        864.1       1646.9       2511.0
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =      13720.6      32081.0      45801.6   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =      13720.6      32081.0      45801.6
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       2243.0       2537.9       4781.0   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2243.0       2537.9       4781.0
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =      16827.7      36265.9      53093.6   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      16827.7      36265.9      53093.6
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      68710.5      77928.1     146638.6   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      68710.5      77928.1     146638.6
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =          4.1          2.1          2.8   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =          4.1          2.1          2.8
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  64
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP   16               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP   16
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =    1.216112
 BEST GAP VALUE     =    0.855269
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =    0.855269
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  65
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   0.5231              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    1.474 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
    0.038              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               84.32     3603.824     3572.729      0.87      1613.32                             1582.23      1582.23      1.93
  2     2.071      1.78     3601.352     3575.791      0.71      1613.00         0.32      0.0200    1587.44      1587.44      1.58      1.04   2
  3     2.429      2.14     3603.226     3575.421      0.78      1612.69         0.31      0.0192    1584.88      1587.44      1.57      1.21   3
  4     1.937      1.74     3600.901     3578.536      0.62      1612.42         0.27      0.0167    1590.05      1590.05      1.39      1.07   4
  5     1.549      1.42     3603.151     3582.717      0.57      1612.25         0.173     0.0108    1591.81      1591.81      1.27      0.78   5
  6     1.926      1.79     3600.204     3577.631      0.63      1612.05         0.196     0.0122    1589.48      1591.81      1.26      0.96   6
  7     2.075      1.98     3600.413     3580.285      0.56      1611.81         0.23      0.0145    1591.69      1591.81      1.24      1.16   7
  8     1.508      1.46     3601.270     3582.278      0.53      1611.66         0.152     0.0094    1592.67      1592.67      1.18      0.76   8
  9     1.922      1.89     3599.885     3581.153      0.52      1611.48         0.183     0.0114    1592.75      1592.75      1.16      0.96   9
 10     1.474      1.47     3599.198                             1611.34         0.14      0.0086                                              10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     0.5024 B =    -0.1576 R-SQUARED =      87.81 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     1.1432%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.15961E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.15950E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.11069E+06
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0694 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP  16)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
 C  37 (1014) 1012      254.84    214.88    -15.68      2.61
 C  37 (1028) 1012      219.42    258.87     17.98      2.55
  1014  1012  1028      237.47    200.23    -15.68      2.52
 C  15 (1028) 1012       62.88     84.19     33.90      2.49
 C   6 (1041) 1045      265.66    306.57     15.40      2.42
  1004  1011  1060       39.04     52.76     35.15      2.03
  1004  1062  1005      229.59    203.00    -11.58      1.81
  1042  1044            676.17    632.85     -6.41      1.69
  1041  1045  1044      394.60    428.35      8.55      1.66
  1060 (1009)C  24       14.00     20.74     48.17      1.62
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    0 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  1 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
   40 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  66
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER   16      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     1.194    56    21   340.26     19    36.20    3     43    376.45  0.006
  2     0.050    50    15   320.62      7     4.59   21     43    325.21  0.002
  3     0.005    50    11   317.02      6     3.70   26     43    320.71  0.000
  4     0.001    48     5   315.09      4     2.38   34     43    317.47  0.000
  5     0.001    44     4   314.68      2     1.91   37     43    316.59  0.000
  6     0.000    45     3   314.54      1     1.80   39     43    316.34  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    7 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    7 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED    11 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION   7 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.02498 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1010 -       0.00
 OUT PROFILES -   1029 -       0.80
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP  16)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1027  1013  1014    591.42  3555.73  2964.31    170.37   170.07    811.74*+
 2  1023  1022  1023    376.71  3161.85  2785.15     16.38    16.35     54.00
 3  1023  1022  1024    376.71  3158.10  2781.40     14.56    14.54     48.00
 4  1023  1022  1008    376.71  3154.35  2777.65    252.53   253.65    832.40
 5  1023  1022  1031    376.71  3150.60  2773.90    364.54   362.36   1201.60
 6  1015  1014  1016    292.63  2999.41  2706.78    154.60   154.17    463.36
 7  1015  1014  1012    292.63  2996.91  2704.28     92.68    93.29    277.78
 8  1015  1014  1013    292.63  2994.41  2701.78    195.13   194.56    584.86
 9  1014  1012  1028   -219.80  1085.78  1305.58     59.21    66.07     93.42
10  1014  1012  1003   -175.23  1085.78  1261.00    290.53   285.94    458.44*+
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.15961E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.15957E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.35533E+05
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0223 %
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  67
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER  16
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  60.12% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    44.70    60.12    77.11    87.95    92.41    99.28    99.76
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                0.29
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =          6.18 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =      0.79 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =       1.25 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =          452.34 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =   20.00 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:      4.42 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =  195
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     50.00 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    42.31    50.00    58.97    79.23    89.74    96.41    98.21
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =       0.714 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
     141899256.     141925702.         26447.     0.00019
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     90563.11  90220.23    342.88      0.38
  SECONDARY STOPS  160399.86 158105.63   2294.23      1.45
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    864.06    858.58      5.48      0.64
  QUEUING DELAYS    13720.56  13719.46      1.11      0.01
  CRUISE TIMES       2243.04   2241.76      1.27      0.06
  TOTAL TIME        16827.66  16819.80      7.86      0.05
  PCU-DISTANCE      68710.48  68673.24     37.23      0.05
  SPEED                 4.08      4.08      0.00      0.01
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1044  1045      0.5040 *    0.3067 *     0.1973       125.6     125.6
  1005  1062      0.8728      0.8513       0.0215         6.1       6.1
  1008  1063      0.7920      0.8084       0.0164        13.9      13.9
  1062  1061      0.4032      0.3913       0.0120         4.9       4.9
  1047  1055      0.9380 *    0.9480 *     0.0100       165.4     165.4
  1062  1005      0.4338      0.4424       0.0086         6.1       6.1
  1010  1063      0.5674      0.5588       0.0085        26.8      26.8
  1061  1010      0.3526      0.3441       0.0084        19.8      19.8
  1010  1061      0.2606      0.2677       0.0071        19.8      19.8
  1011  1004      0.3511 *    0.3450 *     0.0061        19.5      19.5
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =  40
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.9828
     R-SQUARED (Y = X) =     0.9823
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      3.515 SECONDS -  16 LOOPS  GAP =   0.71437%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        858.6       1643.4       2502.0   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        858.6       1643.4       2502.0
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =      13719.5      32041.7      45761.2   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =      13719.5      32041.7      45761.2
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       2241.8       2536.6       4778.3   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2241.8       2536.6       4778.3
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =      16819.8      36221.7      53041.5   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      16819.8      36221.7      53041.5
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      68673.2      77890.0     146563.2   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      68673.2      77890.0     146563.2
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =          4.1          2.2          2.8   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =          4.1          2.2          2.8
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  68
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP   17               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP   17
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =    1.143245
 BEST GAP VALUE     =    0.714372
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =    0.714372
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  69
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   0.5185              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    1.124 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
   -0.007              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               84.89     3603.884     3578.011      0.72      1613.14                             1587.26      1587.26      1.60
  2     2.483      2.16     3602.593     3575.663      0.75      1612.81         0.32      0.0199    1585.88      1587.26      1.58      1.24   2
  3     2.160      1.92     3606.366     3583.397      0.64      1612.52         0.29      0.0180    1589.55      1589.55      1.42      1.14   3
  4     1.765      1.60     3605.942     3585.676      0.57      1612.32         0.20      0.0126    1592.05      1592.05      1.26      0.88   4
  5     2.128      1.97     3605.008     3583.719      0.59      1612.11         0.22      0.0134    1590.82      1592.05      1.24      1.06   5
  6     1.390      1.30     3605.099     3588.398      0.465     1611.96         0.148     0.0092    1595.26      1595.26      1.04      0.74   6
  7     2.223      2.13     3603.450     3583.349      0.56      1611.77         0.186     0.0115    1591.67      1595.26      1.02      1.11   7
  8     1.025      0.99     3603.324     3589.290      0.391     1611.67         0.103     0.0064    1597.63      1597.63      0.87      0.62   8
  9     1.929      1.91     3603.565     3584.978      0.52      1611.53         0.135     0.0084    1592.95      1597.63      0.86      0.96   9
 10     1.124      1.12     3603.259                             1611.43         0.10      0.0065                                              10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     1.2000 B =    -0.6244 R-SQUARED =      92.98 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     0.8076%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.15957E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.15947E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.98477E+05
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0617 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP  17)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
 C  11 (1056) 1017       23.54     45.98     95.30      3.81
  1056  1017  1056        0.95      8.65    806.70      3.51
 C   6 (1041) 1045      306.57    262.78    -14.28      2.60
  1028  1012  1014      225.20    191.16    -15.11      2.36
  1021  1029  1028      245.70    282.98     15.17      2.29
  1059 (1028)C  14      182.28    154.73    -15.11      2.12
  1014  1012  1028      200.23    228.45     14.09      1.93
  1041  1045  1044      428.35    389.78     -9.00      1.91
 C  15 (1014) 1012       75.10     92.54     23.22      1.90
 C  37 (1028) 1012      258.87    229.35    -11.40      1.89
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    1 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  2 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
   39 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  70
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER   17      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     1.283    56    15   328.07     25    46.12    3     43    374.19  0.007
  2     0.085    50    15   313.59      9     4.07   19     43    317.66  0.001
  3     0.017    50     5   311.50      1     0.21   37     43    311.71  0.000
  4     0.000    49     3   310.98      0     0.00   40     43    310.98  0.000
  5     0.000    48     3   310.98      0     0.00   40     43    310.98  0.000
  6     0.000    44     3   310.98      0     0.00   40     43    310.98  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    7 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    7 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED    11 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION   7 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.02784 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1051 -       0.00
 OUT PROFILES -   1029 -       0.90
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP  17)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1027  1013  1014    591.84  3555.64  2963.79    170.30   170.37    811.33*+
 2  1023  1022  1023    375.81  3159.54  2783.73     16.41    16.38     54.00
 3  1023  1022  1024    375.81  3155.79  2779.98     14.58    14.56     48.00
 4  1023  1022  1008    375.81  3152.04  2776.23    251.30   252.53    827.20
 5  1023  1022  1031    375.81  3148.29  2772.48    366.62   364.54   1206.80
 6  1015  1014  1016    296.72  3002.54  2705.82    154.31   154.60    463.21
 7  1015  1014  1012    296.72  3000.04  2703.32     93.49    92.68    280.63
 8  1015  1014  1013    296.72  2997.54  2700.82    193.93   195.13    582.16
 9  1014  1012  1028    185.58  1324.11  1138.53     64.45    59.21    110.20
10  1028  1012  1014   -162.16  1092.68  1254.84     77.15    86.47    121.75*
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.15958E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.15955E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.28347E+05
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0178 %
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  71
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER  17
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  63.49% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    47.23    63.49    76.27    88.07    92.53    99.64    99.76
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                0.28
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =          6.00 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =      0.77 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =       1.26 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =          453.13 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =   19.50 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:      4.30 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =  199
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     51.03 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    44.10    51.03    62.56    79.23    89.74    97.44    98.21
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =       0.680 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
     141890535.     141910411.         19876.     0.00014
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     90220.23  90560.43   -340.20     -0.38
  SECONDARY STOPS  158105.63 159414.09  -1308.47     -0.82
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    858.58    864.01     -5.43     -0.63
  QUEUING DELAYS    13719.46  13704.30     15.15      0.11
  CRUISE TIMES       2241.76   2241.90     -0.14     -0.01
  TOTAL TIME        16819.80  16810.21      9.59      0.06
  PCU-DISTANCE      68673.24  68679.46     -6.22     -0.01
  SPEED                 4.08      4.09      0.00     -0.07
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1044  1045      0.3129 *    0.5040 *     0.1911       125.6     125.6
  1047  1055      0.9606 *    0.9380 *     0.0226       165.4     165.4
  1008  1063      0.8037      0.7920       0.0117        13.9      13.9
  1021  1003      0.5316 *    0.5211 *     0.0105       111.1     111.1
  1063  1010      0.3213      0.3133       0.0080        26.8      26.8
  1048  1047      0.4514      0.4438       0.0076        29.3      29.3
  1005  1062      0.8659      0.8728       0.0070         6.1       6.1
  1059  1034      0.6702 *    0.6632 *     0.0069       108.2     108.2
  1029  1055      0.9896 *    0.9960 *     0.0065       135.7     135.7
  1063  1008      0.5534      0.5584       0.0050        13.9      13.9
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =  40
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.9839
     R-SQUARED (Y = X) =     0.9837
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      3.643 SECONDS -  17 LOOPS  GAP =   0.67966%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        864.0       1642.8       2506.9   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        864.0       1642.8       2506.9
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =      13704.3      32036.9      45741.2   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =      13704.3      32036.9      45741.2
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       2241.9       2534.2       4776.1   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2241.9       2534.2       4776.1
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =      16810.2      36213.9      53024.2   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      16810.2      36213.9      53024.2
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      68679.5      77813.5     146493.0   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      68679.5      77813.5     146493.0
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =          4.1          2.1          2.8   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =          4.1          2.1          2.8
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  72
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP   18               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP   18
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =    0.807561
 BEST GAP VALUE     =    0.679663
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =    0.679663
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  73
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   0.4686              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    1.297 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
    0.027              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               85.44     3603.163     3578.984      0.68      1610.32                             1586.14      1586.14      1.50
  2     1.972      1.72     3601.051     3579.716      0.60      1610.08         0.24      0.0148    1588.74      1588.74      1.33      0.99   2
  3     2.167      1.93     3602.158     3580.543      0.60      1609.85         0.23      0.0144    1588.23      1588.74      1.31      1.08   3
  4     1.520      1.38     3602.598     3583.012      0.55      1609.68         0.164     0.0102    1590.10      1590.10      1.22      0.78   4
  5     1.824      1.68     3602.391     3584.152      0.51      1609.50         0.178     0.0111    1591.26      1591.26      1.13      0.91   5
  6     1.706      1.60     3601.979     3585.462      0.461     1609.35         0.156     0.0097    1592.83      1592.83      1.03      0.85   6
  7     1.603      1.53     3602.251     3585.996      0.453     1609.21         0.132     0.0082    1592.96      1592.96      1.01      0.80   7
  8     1.516      1.47     3601.202     3585.420      0.440     1609.09         0.123     0.0076    1593.31      1593.31      0.98      0.76   8
  9     1.992      1.97     3600.247     3583.456      0.469     1608.93         0.157     0.0098    1592.14      1593.31      0.97      1.00   9
 10     1.297      1.30     3600.989                             1608.83         0.11      0.0068                                              10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     0.5013 B =    -0.2488 R-SQUARED =      88.24 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     0.9460%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.15955E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.15947E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.84941E+05
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0532 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP  18)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
 C   9 (1041) 1042       41.57     81.01     94.87      5.04
 C   6 (1041) 1045      262.78    307.10     16.87      2.63
 C  15 (1028) 1012       73.64     95.70     29.96      2.40
 C  37 (1014) 1012      241.90    206.68    -14.56      2.35
  1014  1012  1028      228.45    195.19    -14.56      2.29
 C  37 (1028) 1012      229.35    264.05     15.13      2.21
  1021  1029  1028      282.98    317.85     12.32      2.01
  1017  1025  1019      506.32    464.68     -8.22      1.89
  1042 (1044)C   9      107.97    127.28     17.88      1.78
 C   9 (1048) 1042      554.90    515.04     -7.18      1.72
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    1 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  2 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
   39 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  74
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER   18      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     1.325    56    21   330.58     19    28.47    3     43    359.05  0.013
  2     0.114    50    11   312.31     10     2.08   22     43    314.40  0.001
  3     0.056    50     5   310.46      2     0.33   36     43    310.79  0.000
  4     0.002    50     4   310.15      1     0.12   38     43    310.28  0.000
  5     0.000    45     3   310.04      0     0.00   40     43    310.04  0.000
  6     0.000    44     3   310.03      0     0.00   40     43    310.03  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    7 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    7 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED    11 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION   7 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.02806 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1010 -       0.00
 OUT PROFILES -   1029 -       0.90
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP  18)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1027  1013  1014    591.03  3554.84  2963.81    170.52   170.30    811.23*+
 2  1023  1022  1023    375.75  3158.32  2782.58     16.42    16.41     54.00
 3  1023  1022  1024    375.75  3154.57  2778.83     14.59    14.58     48.00
 4  1023  1022  1008    375.75  3150.82  2775.08    250.19   251.30    822.95
 5  1023  1022  1031    375.75  3147.07  2771.33    368.18   366.62   1211.05
 6  1015  1014  1016    294.07  3001.59  2707.51    154.61   154.31    463.90
 7  1015  1014  1012    294.07  2999.09  2705.01     92.87    93.49    278.65
 8  1015  1014  1013    294.07  2996.59  2702.51    194.45   193.93    583.44
 9  1014  1012  1028   -206.97  1052.87  1259.84     58.15    64.45     90.71
10  1014  1012  1003   -187.00  1052.87  1239.88    293.76   287.35    458.22*+
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.15942E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.15939E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.26761E+05
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0168 %
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  75
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER  18
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  65.06% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    50.36    65.06    77.71    87.83    93.37    99.76    99.88
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                0.27
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =          5.65 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =      0.72 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =       1.20 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =          451.24 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =   18.03 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:      3.99 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =  210
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     53.85 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    47.44    53.85    63.08    79.23    90.77    96.15    98.21
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =       0.619 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
     141741695.     141757428.         15733.     0.00011
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     90560.43  90266.45    293.98      0.33
  SECONDARY STOPS  159414.09 157774.69   1639.41      1.04
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    864.01    857.73      6.28      0.73
  QUEUING DELAYS    13704.30  13698.87      5.43      0.04
  CRUISE TIMES       2241.90   2239.56      2.34      0.10
  TOTAL TIME        16810.21  16796.17     14.05      0.08
  PCU-DISTANCE      68679.46  68613.45     66.02      0.10
  SPEED                 4.09      4.09      0.00      0.01
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1044  1045      0.8198 *    0.3129 *     0.5069       125.6     125.6
  1005  1062      0.8449      0.8659       0.0210         6.1       6.1
  1008  1063      0.8213      0.8037       0.0177        13.9      13.9
  1012  1014      0.9777 *    0.9893 *     0.0116        71.8      71.8
  1021  1003      0.5407 *    0.5316 *     0.0092       111.1     111.1
  1063  1010      0.3302      0.3213       0.0088        26.8      26.8
  1019  1025      0.7523      0.7435       0.0087        84.0      84.0
  1062  1061      0.4033      0.4070       0.0036         4.9       4.9
  1047  1055      0.9638 *    0.9606 *     0.0033       165.4     165.4
  1013  1004      0.7092 *    0.7121 *     0.0029       172.9     172.9
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =  40
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.8966
     R-SQUARED (Y = X) =     0.8927
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      3.770 SECONDS -  18 LOOPS  GAP =   0.61871%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        857.7       1636.0       2493.7   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        857.7       1636.0       2493.7
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =      13698.9      31902.8      45601.6   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =      13698.9      31902.8      45601.6
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       2239.6       2533.2       4772.8   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2239.6       2533.2       4772.8
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =      16796.2      36072.0      52868.2   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      16796.2      36072.0      52868.2
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      68613.4      77788.0     146401.5   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      68613.4      77788.0     146401.5
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =          4.1          2.2          2.8   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =          4.1          2.2          2.8
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  76
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP   19               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP   19
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =    0.945991
 BEST GAP VALUE     =    0.618705
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =    0.618705
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  77
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   0.3297              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    1.501 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
   -0.018              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               87.47     3599.799     3577.955      0.61      1608.91                             1587.07      1587.07      1.36
  2     1.443      1.28     3598.943     3579.237      0.55      1608.75         0.158     0.0098    1589.05      1589.05      1.22      0.72   2
  3     1.835      1.66     3599.021     3578.134      0.58      1608.57         0.181     0.0112    1587.69      1589.05      1.21      0.92   3
  4     1.741      1.60     3596.574     3579.892      0.466     1608.39         0.182     0.0113    1591.71      1591.71      1.04      0.93   4
  5     1.313      1.22     3599.134     3583.848      0.427     1608.28         0.109     0.0068    1593.00      1593.00      0.95      0.66   5
  6     1.587      1.50     3597.327     3582.261      0.421     1608.16         0.121     0.0075    1593.09      1593.09      0.94      0.79   6
  7     1.476      1.42     3598.106     3584.101      0.391     1608.05         0.111     0.0069    1594.04      1594.04      0.87      0.74   7
  8     1.531      1.49     3597.529     3582.114      0.430     1607.94         0.107     0.0067    1592.53      1594.04      0.86      0.77   8
  9     0.854      0.84     3598.164     3586.340      0.330     1607.88         0.066     0.0041    1596.05      1596.05      0.74      0.47   9
 10     1.501      1.50     3597.605                             1607.79         0.09      0.0055                                              10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     0.6125 B =    -0.3917 R-SQUARED =      79.65 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     0.7057%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.15939E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.15933E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.66855E+05
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0419 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP  19)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
 C   6 (1041) 1045      307.10    269.27    -12.32      2.23
 C  15 (1014) 1012       79.07     94.18     19.12      1.62
  1021  1029  1028      317.85    347.33      9.28      1.62
  1014  1012  1028      195.19    218.31     11.84      1.61
 C  37 (1014) 1012      206.68    229.99     11.28      1.58
  1059 (1028)C  14      146.17    127.86    -12.53      1.56
  1028  1012  1014      211.19    189.43    -10.31      1.54
  1041  1045  1044      422.17    391.26     -7.32      1.53
  1012  1028  1059      198.11    178.00    -10.15      1.47
 C  37 (1028) 1012      264.05    241.62     -8.49      1.41
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    0 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  1 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
   40 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  78
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER   19      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     1.101    56    16   328.02     25    38.09    2     43    366.11  0.015
  2     0.072    50    14   327.45      8     5.13   21     43    332.58  0.001
  3     0.014    50    10   320.25      4     1.81   29     43    322.07  0.000
  4     0.001    49     5   318.68      1     0.15   37     43    318.83  0.000
  5     0.000    48     3   318.37      0     0.00   40     43    318.37  0.000
  6     0.000    44     3   318.37      0     0.00   40     43    318.37  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    8 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    8 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED    11 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION   7 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.02848 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1010 -       0.00
 OUT PROFILES -   1029 -       0.92
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP  19)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1027  1013  1014    592.43  3555.88  2963.44    170.17   170.52    810.98*+
 2  1023  1022  1023    375.06  3157.03  2781.98     16.43    16.42     54.00
 3  1023  1022  1024    375.06  3153.28  2778.23     14.60    14.59     48.00
 4  1023  1022  1008    375.06  3149.53  2774.48    250.24   250.19    822.47
 5  1023  1022  1031    375.06  3145.78  2770.73    368.61   368.18   1211.54
 6  1015  1014  1016    295.08  3002.08  2707.00    154.12   154.61    462.54
 7  1015  1014  1012    295.08  2999.58  2704.50     93.99    92.87    282.08
 8  1015  1014  1013    295.08  2997.08  2702.00    193.72   194.45    581.38
 9  1014  1012  1028    180.05  1275.37  1095.32     61.96    58.15    104.28
10  1014  1012  1003    127.58  1275.37  1147.79    290.69   293.76    489.27*+
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.15948E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.15946E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.19812E+05
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0124 %
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  79
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER  19
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  66.39% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    51.20    66.39    79.88    90.36    94.22   100.00   100.00
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                0.22
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =          4.88 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =      0.62 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =       1.02 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =          452.33 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =   17.73 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:      3.92 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =  193
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     49.49 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    43.85    49.49    64.36    82.05    92.56    96.92    98.21
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =       0.487 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
     141821295.     141830403.          9108.     0.00006
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     90266.45  90612.38   -345.93     -0.38
  SECONDARY STOPS  157774.69 159054.05  -1279.36     -0.80
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    857.73    863.74     -6.01     -0.70
  QUEUING DELAYS    13698.87  13686.98     11.89      0.09
  CRUISE TIMES       2239.56   2238.24      1.33      0.06
  TOTAL TIME        16796.17  16788.95      7.21      0.04
  PCU-DISTANCE      68613.45  68576.86     36.59      0.05
  SPEED                 4.09      4.08      0.00      0.01
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1044  1045      0.3204 *    0.8198 *     0.4994       125.6     125.6
  1005  1062      0.8695      0.8449       0.0246         6.1       6.1
  1008  1063      0.8403      0.8213       0.0189        13.9      13.9
  1062  1005      0.4510      0.4365       0.0144         6.1       6.1
  1047  1055      0.9720 *    0.9638 *     0.0081       165.4     165.4
  1063  1010      0.3382      0.3302       0.0081        26.8      26.8
  1012  1014      0.9717 *    0.9777 *     0.0060        71.8      71.8
  1062  1061      0.4092      0.4033       0.0059         4.9       4.9
  1019  1025      0.7571      0.7523       0.0049        84.0      84.0
  1010  1061      0.2649      0.2606       0.0043        19.8      19.8
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =  40
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.8987
     R-SQUARED (Y = X) =     0.8923
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      3.899 SECONDS -  19 LOOPS  GAP =   0.48726%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        863.7       1637.7       2501.4   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        863.7       1637.7       2501.4
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =      13687.0      31942.1      45629.0   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =      13687.0      31942.1      45629.0
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       2238.2       2531.6       4769.9   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2238.2       2531.6       4769.9
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =      16789.0      36111.4      52900.4   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      16789.0      36111.4      52900.4
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      68576.9      77735.9     146312.7   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      68576.9      77735.9     146312.7
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =          4.1          2.2          2.8   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =          4.1          2.2          2.8
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  80
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP   20               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP   20
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =    0.705674
 BEST GAP VALUE     =    0.487258
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =    0.487258
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  81
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   0.3419              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    0.942 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
    0.012              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               88.52     3600.915     3583.297      0.492     1608.38                             1590.76      1590.76      1.10
  2     1.245      1.12     3600.539     3585.094      0.431     1608.27         0.110     0.0068    1592.83      1592.83      0.96      0.62   2
  3     1.488      1.35     3601.906     3585.495      0.458     1608.16         0.115     0.0071    1591.75      1592.83      0.95      0.74   3
  4     1.744      1.61     3599.071     3583.850      0.425     1608.01         0.143     0.0089    1592.79      1592.83      0.94      0.93   4
  5     1.431      1.34     3600.052     3586.685      0.373     1607.91         0.109     0.0068    1594.54      1594.54      0.83      0.72   5
  6     1.358      1.29     3600.094     3585.846      0.397     1607.81         0.091     0.0056    1593.57      1594.54      0.83      0.68   6
  7     1.520      1.47     3600.935     3588.720      0.340     1607.71         0.108     0.0067    1595.49      1595.49      0.76      0.82   7
  8     1.128      1.10     3600.080     3588.063      0.335     1607.64         0.069     0.0043    1595.62      1595.62      0.75      0.56   8
  9     1.256      1.24     3599.660     3587.397      0.342     1607.56         0.076     0.0047    1595.30      1595.62      0.74      0.63   9
 10     0.942      0.94     3601.152                             1607.50         0.06      0.0036                                              10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     0.1810 B =    -0.2228 R-SQUARED =      87.99 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     0.7257%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.15946E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.15942E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.47289E+05
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0297 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP  20)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
 C   6 (1041) 1045      269.27    306.11     13.68      2.17
 C  37 (1014) 1012      229.99    203.58    -11.48      1.79
 C  37 (1028) 1012      241.62    267.96     10.90      1.65
  1014  1012  1028      218.31    196.15    -10.15      1.54
 C  15 (1028) 1012       89.55    103.94     16.07      1.46
  1062  1005            252.07    231.10     -8.32      1.35
  1059 (1028)C  14      127.86    113.18    -11.48      1.34
  1045  1041  1042      252.44    232.31     -7.97      1.29
  1004  1062  1005      166.41    150.33     -9.67      1.28
 C   6 (1046) 1045      824.77    789.42     -4.29      1.24
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    0 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  1 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
   40 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  82
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER   20      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     0.813    56    17   329.88     21    17.04    5     43    346.92  0.005
  2     0.032    50    10   320.12      8     2.07   25     43    322.18  0.001
  3     0.006    50     5   317.87      3     0.97   35     43    318.83  0.000
  4     0.000    49     3   317.43      0     0.00   40     43    317.43  0.000
  5     0.000    47     3   317.43      0     0.00   40     43    317.43  0.000
  6     0.000    44     3   317.43      0     0.00   40     43    317.43  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    8 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    8 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED    13 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION   7 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.02921 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1010 -       0.00
 OUT PROFILES -   1029 -       0.94
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP  20)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1027  1013  1014    591.80  3555.69  2963.89    170.17   170.17    810.63*+
 2  1023  1022  1023    374.90  3156.24  2781.33     16.44    16.43     54.00
 3  1023  1022  1024    374.90  3152.49  2777.58     14.61    14.60     48.00
 4  1023  1022  1008    374.90  3148.74  2773.83    249.50   250.24    819.66
 5  1023  1022  1031    374.90  3144.99  2770.08    369.64   368.61   1214.34
 6  1015  1014  1016    293.51  3000.77  2707.27    154.43   154.12    463.17
 7  1015  1014  1012    293.51  2998.27  2704.77     93.86    93.99    281.50
 8  1015  1014  1013    293.51  2995.77  2702.27    193.83   193.72    581.33
 9  1014  1012  1028   -157.01  1076.64  1233.65     57.72    61.96     90.80
10  1014  1012  1003   -146.02  1076.64  1222.66    295.32   290.69    464.59*+
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.15949E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.15947E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.18490E+05
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0116 %
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  83
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER  20
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  72.17% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    57.95    72.17    83.13    91.08    93.98   100.00   100.00
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                0.19
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =          3.85 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =      0.49 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =       0.81 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =          452.13 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =   15.14 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:      3.35 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =  245
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     62.82 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    54.10    62.82    71.54    86.67    93.08    97.69    98.21
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =       0.452 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
     141835486.     141845591.         10105.     0.00007
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     90612.38  90322.07    290.30      0.32
  SECONDARY STOPS  159054.05 157923.56   1130.48      0.72
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    863.74    858.39      5.34      0.62
  QUEUING DELAYS    13686.98  13685.04      1.94      0.01
  CRUISE TIMES       2238.24   2237.44      0.80      0.04
  TOTAL TIME        16788.95  16780.88      8.08      0.05
  PCU-DISTANCE      68576.86  68554.18     22.68      0.03
  SPEED                 4.08      4.09      0.00     -0.02
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1044  1045      0.5143 *    0.3204 *     0.1940       125.6     125.6
  1012  1014      0.9651 *    0.9717 *     0.0066        71.8      71.8
  1062  1005      0.4444      0.4510       0.0066         6.1       6.1
  1063  1010      0.3428      0.3382       0.0045        26.8      26.8
  1061  1010      0.3607      0.3567       0.0040        19.8      19.8
  1062  1061      0.4130      0.4092       0.0037         4.9       4.9
  1019  1025      0.7535      0.7571       0.0037        84.0      84.0
  1010  1063      0.5764      0.5728       0.0036        26.8      26.8
  1008  1063      0.8437      0.8403       0.0035        13.9      13.9
  1062  1004      0.4392 *    0.4369 *     0.0024        78.6      78.6
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =  40
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.9842
     R-SQUARED (Y = X) =     0.9836
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      4.030 SECONDS -  20 LOOPS  GAP =   0.45156%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        858.4       1633.5       2491.9   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        858.4       1633.5       2491.9
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =      13685.0      31872.2      45557.2   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =      13685.0      31872.2      45557.2
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       2237.4       2529.9       4767.3   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2237.4       2529.9       4767.3
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =      16780.9      36035.6      52816.5   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      16780.9      36035.6      52816.5
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      68554.2      77689.0     146243.2   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      68554.2      77689.0     146243.2
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =          4.1          2.2          2.8   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =          4.1          2.2          2.8
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  84
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP   21               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP   21
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =    0.725656
 BEST GAP VALUE     =    0.451564
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =    0.451564
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  85
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   0.2602              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    1.670 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
   -0.019              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               88.31     3601.348     3585.138      0.452     1608.62                             1592.41      1592.41      1.01
  2     1.668      1.50     3600.949     3584.094      0.470     1608.48         0.135     0.0084    1591.63      1592.41      1.00      0.83   2
  3     1.266      1.15     3601.659     3588.365      0.370     1608.38         0.107     0.0066    1595.08      1595.08      0.83      0.66   3
  4     1.458      1.35     3600.043     3585.535      0.405     1608.28         0.097     0.0060    1593.77      1595.08      0.82      0.73   4
  5     1.266      1.18     3601.227     3588.975      0.341     1608.19         0.092     0.0057    1595.93      1595.93      0.76      0.70   5
  6     1.566      1.49     3601.244     3588.144      0.365     1608.09         0.096     0.0060    1594.99      1595.93      0.76      0.78   6
  7     1.209      1.16     3600.575     3589.147      0.318     1608.01         0.079     0.0049    1596.58      1596.58      0.71      0.65   7
  8     1.418      1.38     3600.266     3587.133      0.366     1607.93         0.081     0.0050    1594.80      1596.58      0.71      0.71   8
  9     0.826      0.81     3600.945     3591.598      0.260     1607.88         0.054     0.0034    1598.53      1598.53      0.58      0.48   9
 10     1.670      1.67     3600.438                             1607.80         0.08      0.0049                                              10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     0.4104 B =    -0.3986 R-SQUARED =      71.54 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     0.5574%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.15947E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.15942E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.46806E+05
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0294 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP  21)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
 C   6 (1041) 1045      306.11    271.54    -11.29      2.03
  1014  1012  1028      196.15    219.24     11.77      1.60
  1041  1045  1044      415.21    385.96     -7.05      1.46
  1059 (1028)C  14      113.18     99.95    -11.69      1.28
  1042  1044  1045      261.37    282.40      8.05      1.28
  1012  1028  1059      162.28    146.50     -9.72      1.27
  1004  1062  1005      150.33    135.35     -9.96      1.25
  1012 (1014)C  37      364.57    341.64     -6.29      1.22
  1028  1012  1014      205.31    188.32     -8.28      1.21
  1042  1044            630.95    661.41      4.83      1.20
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    0 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  1 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
   40 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  86
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER   21      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     0.861    56    13   328.76     24    30.41    6     43    359.17  0.007
  2     0.316    50    11   325.64     13    10.86   19     43    336.50  0.001
  3     0.234    50     6   320.74      3     6.45   34     43    327.19  0.000
  4     0.218    50     4   320.28      1     6.00   38     43    326.28  0.000
  5     0.217    46     3   320.17      1     6.00   39     43    326.17  0.000
  6     0.217    47     3   320.18      1     6.00   39     43    326.18  0.000
  7     0.217    45     3   320.18      1     6.00   39     43    326.18  0.000
  8     0.217    45     3   320.18      1     6.00   39     43    326.18  0.000
  9     0.217    43     3   320.18      1     6.00   39     43    326.18  0.000
 10     0.217    46     3   320.18      1     5.99   39     43    326.18  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    8 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    8 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   18 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED    13 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION  11 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.01392 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1033 -       1.43
 OUT PROFILES -   1033 -       0.89
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP  21)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1027  1013  1014    594.24  3558.22  2963.97    169.52   170.17    810.91*+
 2  1023  1022  1023    374.72  3155.65  2780.93     16.44    16.44     54.00
 3  1023  1022  1024    374.72  3151.90  2777.18     14.62    14.61     48.00
 4  1023  1022  1008    374.72  3148.15  2773.43    248.82   249.50    817.12
 5  1023  1022  1031    374.72  3144.40  2769.68    370.54   369.64   1216.88
 6  1015  1014  1016    295.79  3002.35  2706.56    153.91   154.43    461.98
 7  1015  1014  1012    295.79  2999.85  2704.06     94.74    93.86    284.37
 8  1015  1014  1013    295.79  2997.35  2701.56    193.12   193.83    579.66
 9  1032  1031  1022    126.35  2556.33  2429.97    286.98   286.90    720.79*+
10  1041  1045  1046   -116.32  1176.01  1292.32    216.96   215.05    348.24
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.15939E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.15937E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.18427E+05
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0116 %
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  87
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER  21
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  68.67% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    55.30    68.67    80.96    90.72    94.82    99.88   100.00
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                0.19
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =          4.06 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =      0.52 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =       0.84 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =          452.66 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =   16.08 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:      3.55 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =  217
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     55.64 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    48.46    55.64    67.95    84.62    95.13    97.95    97.95
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =       0.479 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
     141747435.     141758636.         11201.     0.00008
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     90322.07  90672.31   -350.24     -0.39
  SECONDARY STOPS  157923.56 159174.98  -1251.42     -0.79
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    858.39    864.04     -5.64     -0.65
  QUEUING DELAYS    13685.04  13673.89     11.15      0.08
  CRUISE TIMES       2237.44   2237.46     -0.02      0.00
  TOTAL TIME        16780.88  16775.39      5.48      0.03
  PCU-DISTANCE      68554.18  68555.41     -1.23      0.00
  SPEED                 4.09      4.09      0.00     -0.03
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1044  1045      0.3191 *    0.5143 *     0.1953       125.6     125.6
  1062  1005      0.4609      0.4444       0.0165         6.1       6.1
  1047  1055      0.9808 *    0.9715 *     0.0093       165.4     165.4
  1019  1025      0.7443      0.7535       0.0092        84.0      84.0
  1012  1014      0.9578 *    0.9651 *     0.0073        71.8      71.8
  1062  1061      0.4193      0.4130       0.0064         4.9       4.9
  1029  1055      0.9787 *    0.9850 *     0.0062       135.7     135.7
  1010  1063      0.5823      0.5764       0.0059        26.8      26.8
  1008  1063      0.8493      0.8437       0.0056        13.9      13.9
  1021  1003      0.5449 *    0.5394 *     0.0055       111.1     111.1
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =  40
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.9835
     R-SQUARED (Y = X) =     0.9832
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      4.231 SECONDS -  21 LOOPS  GAP =   0.47921%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        864.0       1635.3       2499.3   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        864.0       1635.3       2499.3
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =      13673.9      31839.7      45513.6   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =      13673.9      31839.7      45513.6
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       2237.5       2527.9       4765.4   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2237.5       2527.9       4765.4
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =      16775.4      36002.9      52778.3   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      16775.4      36002.9      52778.3
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      68555.4      77627.8     146183.3   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      68555.4      77627.8     146183.3
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =          4.1          2.2          2.8   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =          4.1          2.2          2.8
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  88
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP   22               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP   22
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =    0.557393
 BEST GAP VALUE     =    0.451564
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =    0.451564
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  89
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   0.2674              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    0.836 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
    0.023              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               89.82     3599.113     3582.326      0.469     1606.39                             1589.60      1589.60      1.05
  2     1.049      0.95     3598.203     3584.879      0.372     1606.30         0.088     0.0055    1592.97      1592.97      0.83      0.52   2
  3     1.669      1.54     3598.996     3584.600      0.402     1606.19         0.111     0.0069    1591.79      1592.97      0.82      0.83   3
  4     1.277      1.19     3599.031     3586.880      0.339     1606.10         0.092     0.0057    1593.95      1593.95      0.76      0.70   4
  5     1.385      1.31     3597.788     3585.999      0.329     1606.01         0.084     0.0052    1594.22      1594.22      0.73      0.69   5
  6     1.197      1.15     3597.500     3586.805      0.298     1605.94         0.070     0.0044    1595.25      1595.25      0.67      0.60   6
  7     1.002      0.97     3598.206     3587.724      0.292     1605.89         0.054     0.0033    1595.41      1595.41      0.65      0.50   7
  8     1.277      1.25     3598.169     3587.562      0.296     1605.82         0.067     0.0042    1595.21      1595.41      0.65      0.64   8
  9     0.977      0.97     3597.325     3587.732      0.267     1605.77         0.052     0.0032    1596.18      1596.18      0.60      0.50   9
 10     0.836      0.84     3597.502                             1605.73         0.04      0.0025                                              10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     0.1600 B =    -0.3003 R-SQUARED =      89.66 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     0.5788%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.15937E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.15934E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.37679E+05
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0236 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP  22)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
 C   6 (1041) 1045      271.54    309.15     13.85      2.21
  1048 (1047)C   9        0.66      2.72    311.09      1.58
 C  37 (1014) 1012      213.46    191.74    -10.18      1.53
  1041  1045  1044      385.96    412.78      6.95      1.34
 C  37 (1028) 1012      258.01    279.69      8.40      1.32
 C   6 (1046) 1045      823.40    787.01     -4.42      1.28
  1004  1062  1005      135.35    121.58    -10.18      1.22
  1062  1005            214.46    197.32     -7.99      1.19
  1041  1045  1046      479.42    505.46      5.43      1.17
 C  15 (1028) 1012      100.64    112.69     11.97      1.17
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    1 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  2 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
   39 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  90
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER   22      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     0.748    56    16   327.80     19    21.33    8     43    349.13  0.014
  2     0.305    50    10   320.43      5     7.06   28     43    327.49  0.001
  3     0.230    50     4   318.63      2     6.58   37     43    325.21  0.000
  4     0.220    49     3   318.44      1     6.01   39     43    324.45  0.000
  5     0.218    43     3   318.43      1     6.01   39     43    324.44  0.000
  6     0.218    43     3   318.43      1     6.01   39     43    324.44  0.000
  7     0.218    44     3   318.43      1     6.00   39     43    324.43  0.000
  8     0.218    43     3   318.42      1     6.00   39     43    324.42  0.000
  9     0.218    43     3   318.42      1     6.00   39     43    324.42  0.000
 10     0.218    45     3   318.42      1     6.01   39     43    324.43  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    8 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    8 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED    13 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION  11 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.01372 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1033 -       1.44
 OUT PROFILES -   1033 -       0.88
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP  22)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1027  1013  1014    594.19  3559.30  2965.11    169.23   169.52    811.00*+
 2  1023  1022  1023    374.19  3154.84  2780.64     16.45    16.44     54.00
 3  1023  1022  1024    374.19  3151.09  2776.89     14.62    14.62     48.00
 4  1023  1022  1008    374.19  3147.34  2773.14    248.34   248.82    815.18
 5  1023  1022  1031    374.19  3143.59  2769.39    371.31   370.54   1218.82
 6  1015  1014  1016    295.34  3002.75  2707.41    153.87   153.91    461.93
 7  1015  1014  1012    295.34  3000.25  2704.91     95.16    94.74    285.70
 8  1015  1014  1013    295.34  2997.75  2702.41    192.65   193.12    578.37
 9  1014  1012  1028   -131.97  1034.26  1166.23     60.89    62.71     94.35
10  1032  1031  1022    126.31  2555.78  2429.47    287.04   286.98    720.79*+
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.15932E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.15931E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.12610E+05
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0079 %
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  91
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER  22
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  73.86% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    60.12    73.86    84.10    91.69    94.10    99.88    99.88
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                0.17
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =          3.52 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =      0.45 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =       0.75 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =          452.11 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =   15.40 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:      3.41 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =  230
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     58.97 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    51.03    58.97    72.05    87.18    94.87    97.18    98.21
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =       0.436 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
     141692010.     141695736.          3725.     0.00003
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     90672.31  90350.47    321.84      0.36
  SECONDARY STOPS  159174.98 157666.38   1508.61      0.96
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    864.04    857.87      6.17      0.72
  QUEUING DELAYS    13673.89  13667.12      6.77      0.05
  CRUISE TIMES       2237.46   2236.74      0.72      0.03
  TOTAL TIME        16775.39  16761.73     13.66      0.08
  PCU-DISTANCE      68555.41  68536.26     19.16      0.03
  SPEED                 4.09      4.09      0.00     -0.05
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1044  1045      0.9146 *    0.3191 *     0.5956       125.6     125.6
  1005  1062      0.8620      0.8740       0.0121         6.1       6.1
  1008  1063      0.8593      0.8493       0.0099        13.9      13.9
  1029  1055      0.9711 *    0.9787 *     0.0077       135.7     135.7
  1019  1025      0.7499      0.7443       0.0056        84.0      84.0
  1021  1003      0.5488 *    0.5449 *     0.0038       111.1     111.1
  1063  1010      0.3509      0.3472       0.0037        26.8      26.8
  1062  1061      0.4166      0.4193       0.0027         4.9       4.9
  1012  1014      0.9554 *    0.9578 *     0.0023        71.8      71.8
  1063  1008      0.5482      0.5504       0.0022        13.9      13.9
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =  40
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.8626
     R-SQUARED (Y = X) =     0.8578
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      4.432 SECONDS -  22 LOOPS  GAP =   0.43552%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        857.9       1629.8       2487.7   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        857.9       1629.8       2487.7
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =      13667.1      31805.8      45472.9   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =      13667.1      31805.8      45472.9
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       2236.7       2526.1       4762.8   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2236.7       2526.1       4762.8
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =      16761.7      35961.7      52723.4   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      16761.7      35961.7      52723.4
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      68536.3      77573.3     146109.6   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      68536.3      77573.3     146109.6
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =          4.1          2.2          2.8   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =          4.1          2.2          2.8
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  92
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP   23               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP   23
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =    0.578836
 BEST GAP VALUE     =    0.435521
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =    0.435521
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  93
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   0.2833              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    1.130 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
    0.001              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               89.56     3598.381     3582.804      0.435     1606.98                             1591.41      1591.41      0.97
  2     1.349      1.22     3596.908     3581.853      0.420     1606.88         0.105     0.0065    1591.82      1591.82      0.94      0.68   2
  3     1.470      1.35     3598.312     3583.750      0.406     1606.77         0.111     0.0069    1592.21      1592.21      0.91      0.74   3
  4     1.112      1.04     3597.148     3584.503      0.353     1606.69         0.081     0.0050    1594.04      1594.04      0.79      0.56   4
  5     1.192      1.12     3598.764     3587.080      0.326     1606.61         0.075     0.0047    1594.93      1594.93      0.73      0.60   5
  6     1.423      1.36     3597.027     3585.023      0.335     1606.53         0.083     0.0052    1594.53      1594.93      0.72      0.71   6
  7     1.127      1.09     3597.976     3587.322      0.297     1606.46         0.068     0.0042    1595.81      1595.81      0.66      0.58   7
  8     1.075      1.05     3596.923     3585.967      0.306     1606.40         0.057     0.0036    1595.45      1595.81      0.66      0.54   8
  9     1.079      1.07     3596.882     3586.722      0.283     1606.34         0.059     0.0037    1596.19      1596.19      0.63      0.56   9
 10     1.130      1.13     3595.699                             1606.29         0.06      0.0036                                              10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     0.0972 B =    -0.2509 R-SQUARED =      91.07 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     0.6160%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.15931E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.15927E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.40125E+05
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0252 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP  23)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
 C   6 (1041) 1045      309.15    276.88    -10.44      1.89
 C  15 (1014) 1012       81.87     97.62     19.24      1.66
  1041  1045  1044      412.78    383.45     -7.11      1.47
  1014  1012  1028      208.75    230.31     10.33      1.46
 C  37 (1014) 1012      191.74    211.24     10.17      1.37
  1042  1041  1045      360.57    337.33     -6.44      1.24
  1004  1062  1005      121.58    108.88    -10.44      1.18
 C  37 (1028) 1012      279.69    260.95     -6.70      1.14
  1041  1045  1046      505.46    480.28     -4.98      1.13
 C   6 (1046) 1045      787.01    817.60      3.89      1.08
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    0 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  1 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
   40 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  94
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER   23      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     0.976    56    11   325.28     28    36.47    4     43    361.75  0.015
  2     0.268    50     8   325.25     11     9.36   24     43    334.62  0.002
  3     0.231    50     6   322.40      4     6.58   33     43    328.98  0.000
  4     0.221    49     5   322.02      2     6.17   36     43    328.19  0.000
  5     0.220    45     3   321.72      1     6.01   39     43    327.73  0.000
  6     0.219    45     3   321.73      1     6.01   39     43    327.73  0.000
  7     0.219    44     3   321.73      1     6.00   39     43    327.74  0.000
  8     0.219    44     3   321.74      1     6.00   39     43    327.74  0.000
  9     0.219    42     3   321.74      1     6.00   39     43    327.74  0.000
 10     0.219    45     3   321.74      1     6.01   39     43    327.75  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    8 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    8 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED    13 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION  11 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.01373 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1033 -       1.45
 OUT PROFILES -   1033 -       0.88
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP  23)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1027  1013  1014    594.37  3559.99  2965.62    169.06   169.23    811.21*+
 2  1023  1022  1023    373.54  3153.78  2780.24     16.46    16.45     54.00
 3  1023  1022  1024    373.54  3150.03  2776.49     14.63    14.62     48.00
 4  1023  1022  1008    373.54  3146.28  2772.74    248.63   248.34    815.62
 5  1023  1022  1031    373.54  3142.53  2768.99    371.41   371.31   1218.38
 6  1015  1014  1016    295.80  3003.43  2707.63    153.51   153.87    461.00
 7  1015  1014  1012    295.80  3000.93  2705.13     95.84    95.16    287.82
 8  1015  1014  1013    295.80  2998.43  2702.63    192.19   192.65    577.18
 9  1014  1012  1028    148.75  1220.76  1072.01     64.74    60.89    107.00
10  1032  1031  1022    126.73  2555.84  2429.11    287.04   287.04    720.79*+
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.15925E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.15924E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.12009E+05
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0075 %
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  95
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER  23
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  76.02% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    61.69    76.02    85.06    92.17    94.82    99.88   100.00
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                0.16
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =          3.43 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =      0.44 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =       0.75 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =          451.81 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =   14.63 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:      3.24 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =  233
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     59.74 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    50.51    59.74    72.56    85.90    94.87    97.69    98.21
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =       0.384 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
     141623863.     141629883.          6020.     0.00004
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     90350.47  90507.10   -156.63     -0.17
  SECONDARY STOPS  157666.38 157975.06   -308.69     -0.20
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    857.87    859.88     -2.01     -0.23
  QUEUING DELAYS    13667.12  13652.48     14.65      0.11
  CRUISE TIMES       2236.74   2236.88     -0.14     -0.01
  TOTAL TIME        16761.73  16749.24     12.49      0.07
  PCU-DISTANCE      68536.26  68546.56    -10.30     -0.02
  SPEED                 4.09      4.09      0.00     -0.09
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1044  1045      0.4441 *    0.9146 *     0.4705       125.6     125.6
  1062  1005      0.4751      0.4592       0.0159         6.1       6.1
  1005  1062      0.8743      0.8620       0.0124         6.1       6.1
  1047  1055      0.9905 *    0.9804 *     0.0100       165.4     165.4
  1062  1061      0.4250      0.4166       0.0084         4.9       4.9
  1010  1063      0.5875      0.5815       0.0060        26.8      26.8
  1012  1014      0.9497 *    0.9554 *     0.0057        71.8      71.8
  1008  1063      0.8647      0.8593       0.0054        13.9      13.9
  1029  1055      0.9659 *    0.9711 *     0.0051       135.7     135.7
  1063  1010      0.3556      0.3509       0.0046        26.8      26.8
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =  40
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.9127
     R-SQUARED (Y = X) =     0.9039
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      4.631 SECONDS -  23 LOOPS  GAP =   0.38405%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        859.9       1627.5       2487.4   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        859.9       1627.5       2487.4
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =      13652.5      31789.9      45442.4   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =      13652.5      31789.9      45442.4
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       2236.9       2524.3       4761.1   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2236.9       2524.3       4761.1
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =      16749.2      35941.7      52690.9   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      16749.2      35941.7      52690.9
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      68546.6      77513.3     146059.9   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      68546.6      77513.3     146059.9
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =          4.1          2.2          2.8   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =          4.1          2.2          2.8
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  96
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP   24               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP   24
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =    0.615972
 BEST GAP VALUE     =    0.384051
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =    0.384051
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  97
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   0.3037              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    0.983 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
    0.023              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               91.29     3596.051     3582.040      0.391     1604.91                             1590.89      1590.89      0.87
  2     0.939      0.87     3595.587     3584.243      0.316     1604.84         0.066     0.0041    1593.50      1593.50      0.71      0.47   2
  3     1.154      1.08     3597.370     3585.060      0.343     1604.77         0.065     0.0041    1592.46      1593.50      0.70      0.58   3
  4     1.031      0.97     3595.637     3585.514      0.282     1604.71         0.063     0.0039    1594.59      1594.59      0.63      0.56   4
  5     1.132      1.08     3596.239     3585.152      0.309     1604.65         0.057     0.0036    1593.57      1594.59      0.63      0.57   5
  6     0.870      0.84     3595.662     3586.365      0.259     1604.61         0.048     0.0030    1595.31      1595.31      0.58      0.48   6
  7     0.860      0.83     3594.867     3585.029      0.274     1604.57         0.040     0.0025    1594.73      1595.31      0.58      0.43   7
  8     0.777      0.76     3595.955     3587.225      0.243     1604.53         0.038     0.0024    1595.80      1595.80      0.54      0.41   8
  9     1.321      1.31     3595.139     3584.253      0.304     1604.47         0.058     0.0036    1593.58      1595.80      0.54      0.66   9
 10     0.983      0.98     3594.683                             1604.42         0.05      0.0033                                              10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =    -0.0777 B =    -0.2491 R-SQUARED =      92.79 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     0.5266%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.15924E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.15921E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.27322E+05
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0172 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP  24)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
 C   6 (1041) 1045      276.88    305.31     10.27      1.67
 C  15 (1028) 1012      105.79    119.59     13.05      1.30
 C  37 (1014) 1012      211.24    192.84     -8.71      1.29
 C  37 (1028) 1012      260.95    279.25      7.01      1.11
  1062  1005            185.35    170.77     -7.87      1.09
  1028  1012  1014      189.54    204.82      8.07      1.09
 C   6 (1046) 1045      817.60    787.79     -3.65      1.05
 C  17 (1057) 1055       17.26     21.79     26.24      1.02
  1041  1045  1044      383.45    402.37      4.94      0.95
  1045  1041  1042      233.92    219.56     -6.14      0.95
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    0 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  1 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
   40 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  98
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER   24      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     0.888    56    19   333.55     22    23.93    2     43    357.48  0.007
  2     0.257    50     8   325.91     11     9.99   24     43    335.90  0.001
  3     0.223    50     3   322.60      5     6.72   35     43    329.32  0.000
  4     0.220    48     3   322.64      1     6.02   39     43    328.66  0.000
  5     0.219    46     3   322.63      1     6.01   39     43    328.64  0.000
  6     0.219    43     3   322.63      1     6.02   39     43    328.65  0.000
  7     0.219    45     3   322.63      1     6.01   39     43    328.64  0.000
  8     0.219    45     3   322.63      1     6.02   39     43    328.65  0.000
  9     0.219    42     3   322.63      1     6.02   39     43    328.65  0.000
 10     0.219    43     3   322.63      1     6.02   39     43    328.65  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    8 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    8 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED    13 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION  11 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.01375 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1033 -       1.45
 OUT PROFILES -   1033 -       0.88
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP  24)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1027  1013  1014    595.01  3560.88  2965.87    168.82   169.06    811.24*+
 2  1023  1022  1023    373.55  3153.25  2779.71     16.47    16.46     54.00
 3  1023  1022  1024    373.55  3149.50  2775.96     14.64    14.63     48.00
 4  1023  1022  1008    373.55  3145.75  2772.21    248.24   248.63    814.09
 5  1023  1022  1031    373.55  3142.00  2768.46    372.00   371.41   1219.91
 6  1015  1014  1016    294.88  3002.87  2708.00    153.75   153.51    461.61
 7  1015  1014  1012    294.88  3000.37  2705.50     95.84    95.84    287.73
 8  1015  1014  1013    294.88  2997.87  2703.00    192.07   192.19    576.66
 9  1032  1031  1022    126.26  2555.41  2429.15    287.08   287.04    720.79*+
10  1014  1012  1028   -116.07  1082.13  1198.20     62.59    64.74     98.65
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.15913E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.15912E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.12321E+05
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0077 %
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE  99
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER  24
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  76.99% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    64.94    76.99    86.39    92.05    99.28    99.88   100.00
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                0.14
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =          2.85 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =      0.36 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =       0.60 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =          452.09 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =   13.87 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:      3.07 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =  236
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     60.51 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    47.69    60.51    73.08    90.26    95.64    97.95    98.21
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =       0.316 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
     141510059.     141518569.          8511.     0.00006
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     90507.10  90477.72     29.38      0.03
  SECONDARY STOPS  157975.06 158038.36    -63.30     -0.04
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    859.88    859.51      0.36      0.04
  QUEUING DELAYS    13652.48  13645.99      6.49      0.05
  CRUISE TIMES       2236.88   2236.98     -0.10      0.00
  TOTAL TIME        16749.24  16742.48      6.76      0.04
  PCU-DISTANCE      68546.56  68552.97     -6.41     -0.01
  SPEED                 4.09      4.09      0.00     -0.05
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1044  1045      0.6456 *    0.4441 *     0.2015       125.6     125.6
  1008  1063      0.8774      0.8647       0.0127        13.9      13.9
  1005  1062      0.8637      0.8743       0.0107         6.1       6.1
  1062  1005      0.4840      0.4751       0.0090         6.1       6.1
  1063  1010      0.3617      0.3556       0.0061        26.8      26.8
  1019  1025      0.7480      0.7527       0.0047        84.0      84.0
  1047  1055      0.9947 *    0.9905 *     0.0042       165.4     165.4
  1010  1061      0.2723      0.2683       0.0040        19.8      19.8
  1062  1061      0.4270      0.4250       0.0020         4.9       4.9
  1019  1002      0.5368 *    0.5348 *     0.0020        28.0      28.0
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =  40
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.9831
     R-SQUARED (Y = X) =     0.9825
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      4.829 SECONDS -  24 LOOPS  GAP =   0.31613%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        859.5       1626.5       2486.0   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        859.5       1626.5       2486.0
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =      13646.0      31738.6      45384.6   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =      13646.0      31738.6      45384.6
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       2237.0       2522.9       4759.9   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2237.0       2522.9       4759.9
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =      16742.5      35888.0      52630.5   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      16742.5      35888.0      52630.5
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      68553.0      77475.3     146028.3   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      68553.0      77475.3     146028.3
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =          4.1          2.2          2.8   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =          4.1          2.2          2.8
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE 100
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP   25               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP   25
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =    0.526560
 BEST GAP VALUE     =    0.316128
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =    0.316128
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE 101
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   0.2060              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    1.092 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
   -0.032              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               90.90     3593.524     3581.899      0.325     1603.58                             1591.96      1591.96      0.72
  2     1.090      1.00     3593.640     3581.918      0.327     1603.52         0.063     0.0040    1591.80      1591.96      0.72      0.55   2
  3     1.413      1.32     3593.446     3581.651      0.329     1603.43         0.083     0.0052    1591.64      1591.96      0.72      0.72   3
  4     1.096      1.03     3593.942     3583.760      0.284     1603.37         0.065     0.0040    1593.19      1593.19      0.64      0.56   4
  5     1.119      1.07     3593.476     3583.665      0.274     1603.31         0.057     0.0035    1593.50      1593.50      0.61      0.56   5
  6     1.148      1.11     3592.467     3582.759      0.271     1603.26         0.056     0.0035    1593.55      1593.55      0.61      0.57   6
  7     0.690      0.67     3593.503     3585.195      0.232     1603.22         0.034     0.0021    1594.91      1594.91      0.52      0.35   7
  8     1.040      1.02     3592.043     3583.148      0.248     1603.18         0.043     0.0027    1594.28      1594.91      0.52      0.52   8
  9     0.799      0.79     3593.208     3585.820      0.206     1603.14         0.036     0.0022    1595.76      1595.76      0.461     0.43   9
 10     1.092      1.09     3592.201                             1603.10         0.04      0.0025                                              10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =     0.3276 B =    -0.4910 R-SQUARED =      90.06 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     0.4376%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.15912E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.15909E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.26819E+05
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0169 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP  25)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
  1063  1009  1060        4.30     12.34    187.29      2.79
  1009  1060  1011        6.44     14.29    121.94      2.44
 C   6 (1041) 1045      305.31    277.53     -9.10      1.63
  1041  1045  1044      402.37    381.02     -5.31      1.08
  1062  1005            170.77    157.69     -7.66      1.02
 C   6 (1046) 1045      787.79    814.38      3.37      0.94
  1004  1062  1005       99.40     90.35     -9.10      0.93
  1048 (1047)C   9        2.22      3.84     72.61      0.93
  1041  1045  1046      487.39    467.67     -4.04      0.90
 C   9 (1041) 1042       40.68     46.61     14.58      0.90
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    0 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  1 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
   40 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE 102
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER   25      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     0.907    56     8   321.41     28    31.29    7     43    352.70  0.005
  2     0.249    50     9   321.73      9     7.55   26     44    329.28  0.001
  3     0.227    50     3   320.31      2     6.14   39     44    326.46  0.000
  4     0.221    49     3   320.32      1     6.02   40     44    326.34  0.000
  5     0.219    44     3   320.31      1     6.02   40     44    326.33  0.000
  6     0.219    44     3   320.31      1     6.02   40     44    326.32  0.000
  7     0.219    44     3   320.31      1     6.02   40     44    326.32  0.000
  8     0.219    42     3   320.31      1     6.02   40     44    326.32  0.000
  9     0.219    45     3   320.31      1     6.02   40     44    326.33  0.000
 10     0.219    45     3   320.31      1     6.02   40     44    326.33  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    7 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    7 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED    11 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION  11 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.01369 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1033 -       1.45
 OUT PROFILES -   1033 -       0.88
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP  25)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1027  1013  1014    596.28  3562.60  2966.31    168.36   168.82    811.40*+
 2  1023  1022  1023    373.66  3153.10  2779.45     16.47    16.47     54.00
 3  1023  1022  1024    373.66  3149.35  2775.70     14.64    14.64     48.00
 4  1023  1022  1008    373.66  3145.60  2771.95    247.82   248.24    812.62
 5  1023  1022  1031    373.66  3141.85  2768.20    372.48   372.00   1221.38
 6  1015  1014  1016    296.07  3003.76  2707.70    153.42   153.75    460.83
 7  1015  1014  1012    296.07  3001.26  2705.20     96.35    95.84    289.39
 8  1015  1014  1013    296.07  2998.76  2702.70    191.69   192.07    575.78
 9  1032  1031  1022    126.11  2554.97  2428.87    287.13   287.08    720.79*+
10  1041  1045  1046    -92.70  1157.17  1249.87    215.79   214.49    344.11
 
 */+ - EXIT LINK BLOCKING BACK NOW/PREVIOUSLY
 
 
 POST SIMULATION:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.15902E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.15900E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.13301E+05
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0084 %
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE 103
 
 
 
-----     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE PARAMETERS:     -----
 
                    LOOP NUMBER  25
 
          (See Section 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual.)
 
 
     (1)  76.63% ("%OK") OF THE ASSIGNED FLOWS ARE WITHIN
           1.00% OF THEIR PREVIOUS VALUES - THE CRITICAL VALUE,
           RSTOP, IS  99.50 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF %OK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    65.06    76.63    85.78    93.37    99.40    99.64    99.64
 
 
     (2) FURTHER COMPARISON STATISTICS OF FLOW DIFFERENCES:
 
     MEAN GEH STATISTIC =                0.14
     MEAN ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE =          2.87 PCU/HR
     RELATIVE MEAN ABS DIFFERENCE =      0.37 %
     RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION =       0.59 %
 
 
     (3) COMPARE THE TURN DELAYS AS ESTIMATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT
     WITH THE CORRECT DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE (SUBSEQUENT) SIMULATION;
     AT CONVERGENCE THE TWO SHOULD BE IDENTICAL.
 
 
     MEAN SIMULATED TURN DELAY =          451.03 SECS.
     MEAN ABS. DIFF. IN ASS/SIM DELAYS =   13.01 SECS.
                           RELATIVELY:      2.88 %
 
     NUMBER DIFFERING BY <   1.00% OR < 1 SECOND =  239
                        RELATIVELY ("PCOK"):     61.28 %
 
 
     DISTRIBUTION OF PCOK AS A FUNCTION OF THE CRITICAL %DIFFERENCE:
 
  <  0.5      1.0      2.0      5.0     10.0     20.0     50.0 %
    52.82    61.28    75.38    89.74    96.41    98.72   100.00
 
 
     (4) ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION GAP FUNCTION =       0.296 %
 
 
     (5) SIMPLE V.I. TEST ON THE STEP LENGTH USED TO COMBINE
     THE ASSIGNED VOLUMES FROM THE LAST AND PREVIOUS
     ASSIGNMENTS (N AND N-1)
 
          CN.VN        CN.VN-1     DIFFERENCE    FRACTION V.I.
     141400949.     141409048.          8099.     0.00006
 
     N.B. IDEALLY THE DIFFERENCE TERMS SHOULD BE 0 OR > 0
 
 
     (6) CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SIMULATION TOTALS:
 
                    PREVIOUS  CURRENT    DIFFERENCE      %
                    I T E R A T I O N
 
  PRIMARY STOPS     90477.72  90525.57    -47.85     -0.05
  SECONDARY STOPS  158038.36 158043.52     -5.16      0.00
  TRANSIENT DELAYS    859.51    859.87     -0.35     -0.04
  QUEUING DELAYS    13645.99  13630.59     15.39      0.11
  CRUISE TIMES       2236.98   2236.86      0.12      0.01
  TOTAL TIME        16742.48  16727.32     15.16      0.09
  PCU-DISTANCE      68552.97  68553.52     -0.55      0.00
  SPEED                 4.09      4.10      0.00     -0.09
 
 
     (7) LISTING OF THE (UP TO) 10 BIGGEST CHANGES IN BLOCKING
         BACK FACTORS ON SIMULATION LINKS BETWEEN ASS-SIM LOOPS:
 
    A      B     BBF(NOW)   BBF(BEFORE)   DIFFERENCE    STACK     Q-BAR
  1044  1045      0.5277 *    0.6456 *     0.1179       125.6     125.6
  1008  1063      0.8904      0.8774       0.0130        13.9      13.9
  1060  1011      0.4958      0.5008       0.0050        86.1      86.1
  1063  1010      0.3653      0.3617       0.0037        26.8      26.8
  1047  1055      0.9978 *    0.9947 *     0.0031       165.4     165.4
  1013  1004      0.7197 *    0.7172 *     0.0025       172.9     172.9
  1012  1003      0.3125 *    0.3102 *     0.0023       103.1     103.1
  1021  1003      0.5470 *    0.5493 *     0.0023       111.1     111.1
  1005  1062      0.8617      0.8637       0.0020         6.1       6.1
  1010  1061      0.2739      0.2723       0.0016        19.8      19.8
 
 * - HEAD OF A BLOCKING-BACK QUEUE
 
 
     Number of links actively blocking back =  41
 
     R-SQUARED (Y = AX + B) =     0.9947
     R-SQUARED (Y = X) =     0.9946
 
 Where Y are the latest blocking-back factors and
 X are the blocking-back factors from the previous loop.
 
 
 CPU TIME TO DATE =      5.032 SECONDS -  25 LOOPS  GAP =   0.29607%
 
 
     SIMULATION (S), BUFFER (B) AND BUFFER CENTROID CONNECTORS (BCC)
 
        ABSOLUTE TOTALS:     THIS TIME    NEXT TIME        TOTAL
                               PERIOD       PERIOD
 
 TRANSIENT QUEUES  (S) =        859.9       1623.2       2483.1   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =        859.9       1623.2       2483.1
 
 OVER-CAPACITY QUEUES  =      13630.6      31705.1      45335.7   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                   (T) =      13630.6      31705.1      45335.7
 
 LINK CRUISE TIME  (S) =       2236.9       2521.6       4758.5   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =       2236.9       2521.6       4758.5
 
 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME (S) =      16727.3      35850.0      52577.3   PCU. HRS.
                   (B) =          0.0          0.0          0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      16727.3      35850.0      52577.3
 
 TRAVEL DISTANCE   (S) =      68553.5      77431.6     145985.2   PCU. KMS.
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =      68553.5      77431.6     145985.2
 
 AVERAGE SPEED     (S) =          4.1          2.2          2.8   KPH
                   (B) =          0.0                       0.0
                 (BCC) =          0.0                       0.0
                   (T) =          4.1          2.2          2.8
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE 104
 
+++++               FULL ASSIGNMENT LOOP   26               +++++
 
 AUTONA = T: NITA SET TO   10 FOR ASSIGNMENT LOOP   26
 LAST VALUE OF NITA =   10
 LAST EPSILON VALUE =    0.437603
 BEST GAP VALUE     =    0.296072
 TARGET GAP VALUE   =    0.296072
 
 
             WARDROP USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT: 1 USER CLASS
 
 
 N.B. DIDDLE = T: THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS EQUAL
      TO FLOWS FROM THE PREVIOUS (FULL) ASSIGNMENT
 
 
 
 >>>>> REASSIGNMENT STOPPED AFTER   10 ITERATIONS >>>>>
       MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS NITA EXCEEDED
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE 105
 
 
 
 FINAL CONVERGENCE STATISTICS AND STOPPING VALUES
 
       10 GE        10 - NUMBER OF ITERATIONS (<NITA)
   0.2183              - % DELTA (ACTUAL COSTS LESS MINIMUM COSTS)
    0.512 LT     0.050 - % OF NEW A-O-N LOAD USED (<XFSTOP)
    0.038              - % CHANGE IN TOTAL TRAVEL COSTS
 
 
          SUMMARY TABLE OF ASSIGNMENT CONVERGENCE STATISTICS:
 
               See Section 9.9.2 of the SATURN Manual
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
  1               92.57     3591.063     3580.433      0.297     1601.77                             1591.14      1591.14      0.66
  2     0.885      0.83     3590.385     3580.134      0.286     1601.72         0.047     0.0029    1591.47      1591.47      0.64      0.44   2
  3     0.989      0.93     3591.041     3581.652      0.262     1601.67         0.051     0.0032    1592.28      1592.28      0.59      0.49   3
  4     1.040      0.99     3589.586     3580.802      0.245     1601.62         0.049     0.0031    1592.84      1592.84      0.55      0.52   4
  5     0.811      0.78     3590.325     3581.533      0.245     1601.59         0.036     0.0022    1592.80      1592.84      0.55      0.41   5
  6     0.893      0.87     3589.740     3581.636      0.226     1601.55         0.039     0.0024    1593.44      1593.44      0.51      0.45   6
  7     1.008      0.99     3589.645     3581.263      0.234     1601.51         0.041     0.0025    1593.13      1593.44      0.50      0.50   7
  8     0.646      0.64     3590.042     3582.656      0.206     1601.48         0.027     0.00170   1594.09      1594.09      0.461     0.34   8
  9     0.903      0.90     3588.674     3580.858      0.218     1601.45         0.033     0.0021    1593.63      1594.09      0.459     0.45   9
 10     0.512      0.51     3589.524                             1601.43         0.02      0.00125                                             10
 
 ITER  LAMBDA  FRACTION        C1           C2        DELTA         Z             DZ       FDZ          ZLB         ZULB       EPS       FIMP
         %          %                                   %                                   %                                   %         %
 
 
 REGRESS LOG(EPS) VRS LOG(N):
 A =    -0.1248 B =    -0.3014 R-SQUARED =      92.91 %
 
 ESTIMATED EPSILON FOR THE FINAL ITERATION =     0.4448%
 
 
 POST ASSIGNMENT:
 
 
     ASSIGNMENT/SIMULATION CONVERGENCE MEASURED AS A V.I. FUNCTION:
 
     WITH THE LATEST SIMULATED COSTS TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS OF:
     PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED SATEASY FLOWS = 0.15900E+09
     LATEST SET OF ASSIGNED FLOWS      = 0.15899E+09
               DIFFERENCE              = 0.18922E+05
 
     THE % DIFFERENCE OR V.I. FUNCTION =      0.0119 %
 
 
 
                         Table L(9)   (LOOP  26)
 
          LISTING OF THE 10 LINKS WHICH DIFFER MOST
          COMPARING THE LATEST ASSIGNED FLOWS WITH FLOWS FROM THE
          PREVIOUS LOOP IN ORDER OF DECREASING GEH STATISTICS:
 
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
                      PREVIOUS    LATEST    % DIFF      GEH
                       F L O W  (PCU/HR)
 
 C   6 (1041) 1045      277.53    308.02     10.99      1.78
  1063  1009  1060       12.34     17.48     41.63      1.33
 C  11 (1056) 1017       29.81     37.41     25.49      1.31
 C   6 (1046) 1045      814.38    779.80     -4.25      1.22
  1009  1060  1011       14.29     19.29     34.94      1.22
 C  17 (1057) 1055       19.80     25.02     26.36      1.10
  1041  1045  1044      381.02    402.76      5.70      1.10
 C  37 (1014) 1012      200.01    185.15     -7.43      1.07
 C   6 (1044) 1045       15.09     19.18     27.09      0.99
 C  15 (1028) 1012      116.48    126.91      8.96      0.95
 
 
          PRE-ESTIMATES OF BLOCKING-BACK FACTORS:
 
    1 LINKS HAVE HAD THEIR FACTORS RE-SET TO 1.0 AFTER  2 INTERNAL ITERATIONS
   40 LINKS RETAIN THEIR PREVIOUS FACTORS.
1
 
       Exemouth Test Network                                          PAGE 106
 
 
 
#####      OUTPUT FROM SIMULATION RUN NUMBER   26      #####
 
 
          SIMULATION CONVERGENCE STATISTICS BY ITERATION:
 
     ITER   - ITERATION NUMBER
     CC     - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN OUT PROFILES IN PCU/HR
     NO SIM - NUMBER OF NODES SIMULATED
     NO >   - LINKS WITH QUEUE GT STACK -
     SUM >  - TOTAL EXCESS PCUS
     NO <   - LINKS WITH QUEUE LT STACK -
     SUM <  - TOTAL SPARE PCUS
     NO =   - LINKS WITH QUEUE EQ STACK (TO +- 0.1 PCU)
     NO BB  - LINKS WITH BLOCKING BACK;
     SUM    - SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUEUES AND STACKS
     ABBC   - AVERAGE ABSOLUTE CHANGE IN BLOCKING BACK FACTORS
 
 ITER     CC  NO SIM   NO>   SUM>      NO<   SUM<    NO=  NO BB     SUM   ABBC
 
  1     0.815    56    12   327.91     21    19.74   10     43    347.65  0.002
  2     0.262    50    10   324.55     10    10.37   23     43    334.92  0.001
  3     0.224    50     3   322.23      4     8.75   36     43    330.98  0.000
  4     0.221    49     3   322.27      2     8.41   38     43    330.68  0.000
  5     0.219    45     3   322.27      2     8.41   38     43    330.67  0.000
  6     0.219    44     3   322.27      2     8.41   38     43    330.68  0.000
  7     0.219    45     3   322.27      2     8.41   38     43    330.67  0.000
  8     0.219    45     3   322.27      2     8.41   38     43    330.67  0.000
  9     0.219    45     3   322.27      2     8.41   38     43    330.68  0.000
 10     0.219    43     3   322.27      2     8.41   38     43    330.68  0.000
 
 FINAL SIMULATION PLUS COST-FLOW CURVE CALCULATIONS:
 
    7 WARNINGS HAVE OCCURRED IN CALCULATING FLOW-DELAY CURVES FOR   390 TURNS:
 
    0 WITH DELAY(CAPACITY) LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     LT DELAY(ZERO)
    0 WITH DELAY(FLOW)     GT DELAY(CAPACITY)
    7 WITH N GT   10.0 (PMAX) IN DELAY(V) = A*V**N
    0 WITH CORRECTIONS > 0.1 SECONDS TO MATCH REAL DELAYS TO ESTIMATED
   17 FLAT CURVES THROUGH THE REAL DELAY (LESS SERIOUS COMMENTS)
    0 MIXED-UP V/C RATIOS WITHIN RIVERS
    0 NEGATIVE VALUES FOR REVCAP
 
 
     SUMMARY OF CALLS TO PARAMETERS MAXQCT AND MAXDTP:
 
 MAXQCT =   60 MINUTES;  USED    13 TIMES
 MAXDTP =   10 MINUTES;  USED     0 TIMES
 
 ITERATION  11 - AVER. ABS. CHANGE =      0.01369 PCU/HR
 
 
LEAST WELL CONVERGED SIMULATION NODES:
  IN PROFILES -   1033 -       1.45
 OUT PROFILES -   1033 -       0.88
 
 
                         Table L(8)
 
          WORST TURN DELAY DIFFERENCES: (LOOP  26)
          BETWEEN THE SIMULATED DELAYS (CURRENT) AND
          THE DELAYS CALCULATED BY THE ASSIGNMENT (PREVIOUS)
               (See 9.9.1 of the SATURN Manual)
 
 RANK  A     B     C         D E L A Y S              CAPACITIES     ACT FLOW
                     DIFFERENCE CURRENT PREVIOUS   CURRENT PREVIOUS    PCU/HR
 
 
 1  1027  1013  1014    595.68  3562.77  2967.10    168.32   168.36    811.52*+
 2  1023  1022  1023    373.05  3152.43  2779.37     16.47    16.47     54.00
 3  1023  1022  1024    373.05  3148.68  2775.62     14.64    14.64     48.00
 4  1023